Exploring Implicit Corrective Feedback Preferences on Students’ Speaking Performance

Diana Rahmawati Rozak; Maisa Maisa; Sri Hartati

doi:10.31764/leltj.v11i1.15678

Exploring Implicit Corrective Feedback Preferences on Students’ Speaking Performance

Diana Rahmawati Rozak, Maisa Maisa, Sri Hartati

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the students’ preferences and perceptions toward implicit corrective feedback on their speaking performance. This research is qualitative case study research with data collection techniques using observation, questionnaires, and interviews. The participants of this study were 12th-grade, high school students. The author found the most preferred types and timing in the corrective feedback implementation such as: Recast CF, and Immediate CF as the method to correct the errors in their speaking performance given by the teacher. Researchers also found that students have positive perceptions toward implicit corrective feedback. Most participants prefer to be corrected by their teacher when they make an error in their speaking performance.

Keywords

Implicit Corrective Feedback, Students’ Preferences, Students’ Perceptions, Speaking Performance

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] N. Alkhatib, (2015) Written corrective feedback at a Saudi University: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices. PhD thesis, University of Essex.

F. Ananda, E., Yamin, M., & Mu’in, F. (2017). Students’ Preferences toward Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class at English Department of Lambung Mangkurat University Academic Year 2015/2016. Theory And Practice In Language Studies, 7(3), 176.

A. Devi,. (2014). Teacher's Corrective Feedback on Students' Spoken Errors in an EFL Classroom. The 61st TEFLIN International Conference.

R. Ellis, (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1, 3-18.

A. Hamouda,. (2011). A Study of Students and Teachers' Preferences and Attitudes towards Correction of Classroom Written Errors in Saudi EFL Context. English Language Teaching, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p128

R. Kulhavey, & Anderson, R. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 505–512.

R. Lyster. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Student Uptake: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66

R. Lyster. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432.

M. Patton. (2018). Evaluation Science. American Journal of Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018763121

N. Pfanner,. (2015). Teacher Corrective Oral Feedback in the Classroom. Journal Of Language And Education, 1(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2015-1-2-46-55

T. Phuong & Huan, N. B. (2018). Teacher Corrective Feedback on Students’ Speaking Performance and Their Uptake in EFL Classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3).

P. Quinn,. (2014). Delayed Versus Immediate Corrective Feedback on Orally Produced Passive Errors in English. Thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto.

H. Roothooft & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25, 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580

Y. Sheen,., & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 593-610). New York: Routledge.

T. Smith,., & Kimball, D. (2010). Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,36,80–95.

R. Yin (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

R. Yoshida. (2008). Learners' Perception of Corrective Feedback in Pair Work. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03310.x

Y. Zhu & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: a large-scale survey. Language Awareness, 28(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620755

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v11i1.15678