THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITVE LEARNING STRATEGY TOWARDSTUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF MTs.AL- MADANIYAH JEMPONG MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017

Hidayati Hidayati

doi:10.31764/leltj.v10i2.791

THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITVE LEARNING STRATEGY TOWARDSTUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN LISTENING COMPREHENSION (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF MTs.AL- MADANIYAH JEMPONG MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017

Hidayati Hidayati

Abstract

This study is about the effect of metacognitive learning strategy toward students’ achievement in listening comprehension an experimental study at the second-year students of MTs.AL-MADANIYAH Jempong Mataram in the academic year 2016-2017. The purpose of the study is to know whether there is an effect of metacognitive learning strategy or not toward students’ achievement in listening comprehension. The research method was quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent control group design. The population of the research was all of the second year Students of MTs.AL-MADANIYAH Jempong Mataram, conducted of two classes as a sample; Experimental group II A and Control group II B. II A was taught by using Metacognitive Learning Strategy while II B was taught without using Metacognitive Learning Strategy. The researcher gave the Listening test to gather the data. The formula that used to analyze the data was t-test. It is supposed to know the significant difference between students’ score in the experimental group and control group. Based on the computation of the t-test formula, it was found that the mean score of the experimental group was 17,6 and the mean score of the control group was 9,2. After analyzing the data, it was found that t-test was 5,626. The degree of freedom (df) was (Nx+Ny-2) = (25+25-2) =48. The degree of freedom from 38 students as the sample. The researcher got a score for confident level 0.5 or 95% and score 2.000, for confident level 0.1 or 99% is 2.660. It means that t-test was higher than t-table. After the data had been obtained; it was found that metacognitive learning strategy has a positive effect on teaching listening. It showed by the significant value of t-test >t-table. It means that Ha (alternative hypotheses) was accepted because t-test was higher than t-table. Based on the explanation, the researcher concludes that the effect of metacognitive learning strategy toward students achievement in listening comprehension at the second year students of MTs.AL- MADANIYAH Jempong Mataram has a positive effect.

Keywords

Metacognitive Learning Strategy,Listening Comprehension.

Full Text:

PDF

References

An ,Xuehua and Shi, Zhenmei.(2013).Does Metacognitive Instruction Improve Listening Comprehension. Foreign Languages Departement, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 632-636, April 2013.

Arikunto, Suharsimi (2006).Prosedur Penelitian :Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta :Rineka cipta.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: PT.Rineke Cipta.

Brown, H.D.(2000).Principles of language learning and teaching.New York : Cambridge University Press.

Brown, Steven ( 2006).Teaching Listening.New York: Cambridge University Press. Brown,H.Douglas (2001). Taching By Principles an Interactive Approach to Language

Pedagogy .New York .Longman

Harmer, Jeremy.( 2007).The Practice the English Language Teaching.

Cambridge,UK:Longman.

Moghadam , Mosoud Yazdani ( 2015). On the Effect of Negotiated Metacognitive

Assessments on Improving Listening Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL

Learners. Australian International Academic Centre, Australia.

O’Malley,J.M. and A.U.Chamot (1990).Learning Strategy in Second Language

Acquisition.Cambridge :Cambridge University Press.

Richard,Jack C and Renandya,Willy A .(2002).Methodology in Language Teaching.New York

:Cambridge University Press.

Uso-Juan, Esther and Martinez-Flor,A. (2006). Current Trends in the Development and

Teachingof the Four Language Skills. New York. Mouton de GruyterBerlin Vandergrift, L and Goh ,C.M.Christine . (2012) .Teaching and Learning SecondLanguage

Listening.New York .Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Vandergrift, Larry and C.M.Goh,Christine. (2012). Teaching and Learning Secong Language

Listening. New york and London. Routledge taylor and Francis Group.

Nunan, David(2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York, USA :The McGraw-

hill companies, inc.

Flavell, J.H . (1997)Metacognition and cognitive monitoring :A new area of cognitive-

developmental inquiry. American Psychologist .

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i2.791