MODEL EARTHCOMM BERBANTUAN GOOGLE EARTH PRO: PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR SPASIAL MENDALAM PADA MATERI PENELITIAN GEOGRAFI
Abstract
Abstrak: Keunggulan dalam model pembelajaran Earth System Science in The Community (Earthcomm) yaitu mampu mempersiapkan peserta didik dalam proses penyelidikan ke dalam menganalisis tentang fenomena. Kegiatan menganalisis pada saat melakukan penyelidikan dalam pembelajaran geografi, dibutuhkan kemampuan berpikir spasial yang baik. Namun, pengajaran geografi yang berpusat pada guru dan berfokus pada materi masih banyak diterapkan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan membangun kapabilitas kemampuan berpikir spasial pada tingkat mendalam menggunakan model pembelajaran Earthcomm, sebagai subjek penelitian siswa IPS kelas X di SMAN 3 Malang dengan memanfaatkan media Google Earth Pro. Quasi Experiment menjadi jenis penelitian ini dengan Pretest and Posttest with Nonequivalent Control Group Design dan menggunakan instrumen tes esai yang telah diverifikasi validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Berdasarkan indikator kemampuan berpikir spasial mendalam, pertanyaan-pertanyaan disusun secara terstruktur. Analisis data untuk Uji One Way Anova dengan bantuan Windows SPSS 25. Penelitian ini menghasilkan nilai Sig (2-tailed) sebesar 0,025 < 0,05 dan dinyatakan bahwa model Earthcomm dengan media Google Earth Pro berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir spasial mendalam pada materi penelitian geografi. Adapun tahapan terpenting yang perlu dilakukan untuk mengoptimalkan kemampuan berpikir spasial mendalam siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran Earthcomm yaitu pada tahapan pengumpulan dan analisis data. Sebab, model Earthcomm membutuhkan waktu yang banyak dalam pelaksanaannya.
Abstract: Excellence in the Earth System Science in The Community (Earthcomm) learning model is able to prepare students in the process of investigation into analyzing phenomena. Analyzing activities when conducting investigations in geography learning, good spatial thinking skills are needed. However, geography teaching that is teacher centered and material-focused is still widely applied in Indonesia. This study aims to build spatial thinking capabilities at a deep level using the Earthcomm learning model, as a research subject for grade X social studies students at SMAN 3 Malang by utilizing Google Earth Pro media. Quasi Experiment becomes this type of research with Pretest and Posttest with Nonequivalent Control Group Design and uses essay test instruments that have been verified for validity and reliability. Based on indicators of deep spatial thinking skills, questions are arranged in a structured manner. Data analysis for One Way Anova Test with the help of Windows SPSS 25. This study produced a Sig (2-tailed) value of 0.025 < 0.05 and it was stated that the Earthcomm model with Google Earth Pro media affected the ability to think deeply spatial in geography research material. The most important stage that needs to be done to optimize students' deep spatial thinking skills using the Earthcomm learning model is at the stage of data collection and analysis. Because, the Earthcomm model requires a lot of time in its implementation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aliman, M., Budijanto, Sumarmi, Astina, I. K., Putri, R. E., & Arif, M. (2019). The effect of earthcomm learning model and spatial thinking ability on geography learning outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.323
Aliman, M., Halek, D. H., Lukman, S., Marni, S., & Alnursa, D. S. (2022). Apakah Model Earthcomm Dan Gaya Belajar Dapat Mempengaruhi Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Siswa Sma? Jambura Geo Education Journal, 3(2), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.34312/jgej.v3i2.16348
Andriana, R. C. (2021). Dampak Pembelajaran Daring Saat Covid-19 Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi Kelas XI IPS SMAN 1 Labuhan Haji. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha, 9(2), 82–89. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPG/article/view/32922%0Ahttps://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPG/article/viewFile/32922/19377
Anggraini, Y. (2022). Program Pendidikan Karakter dalam Mengatasi Krisis Moral di Sekolah. Jurnal basicedu, 6(4), 5877–5889. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1230
Baharuddin, B., & Wahyuni, E. N. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/6124/
Cholifah, N., & Alfi, C. (2022). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Sistem Informasi Geografi Sebagai Penguat Karakter Peduli Lingkungan. Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, 7(3), 660. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v7i3.1003
Dia, F., Putra, A. K., & Suharto, Y. (2021). Improving Critical Thinking Ability : Earthcomm Learning For Watershed Conservation Materials. IJIS Edu : Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education, 3(2), 99–106.
Dolliver, H. A. S. (2012). Using Google Earth to teach geomorphology. Special Paper of the Geological Society of America, 492, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2492(32)
Fathurrohman. (2006). Model-Model Pembelajaran. http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/upload/132313272/pengabdian/model-model-pembelajaran.pdf
Golledge, R. G. (2002). The Nature of Geographic Knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00276
Hariyanto, S. dan. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep Dasar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Herawati, H. (2021). Kompetensi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Guru Kimia. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 1(4), 291–298.
Hidayanti, I. H., Sumarmi, S., & Utomo, D. H. (2019). Pengaruh Model Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 4(9), 1222. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i9.12730
Hsu, H. P., Tsai, B. W., & Chen, C. M. (2018). Teaching Topographic Map Skills and Geomorphology Concepts with Google Earth in a One-Computer Classroom. Journal of Geography, 117(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2017.1346138
Huynh, N. T., & Sharpe, B. (2013). An Assessment Instrument to Measure Geospatial Thinking Expertise. Journal of Geography, 112(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2012.682227
Ishikawa, T. (2013). Geospatial thinking and spatial ability: An empirical examination of knowledge and reasoning in geographical science. Professional Geographer, 65(4), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2012.724350
Jazuli, M., Rusijono, R., & Bachri, B. S. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Earthcomm Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Di Mas Al-Mas’Udy Mojokerto. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 8(4), 2907–2914. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i4.4055
Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2014). Dispositions toward teaching spatial thinking through geography: Conceptualization and an exemplar assessment. Journal of Geography, 113(5), 198–207.
Kasi, K., Sumarmi, & Astina, I. K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Service Learning terhadap Sikap Peduli Lingkungan. Jurnal Pendidikan:Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(4), 437–440.
Kundiati, & Anggo, M. (2016). Peran Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Gografi Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negri 1 Kaledupa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Geografi, 1(1), 61–73.
Kurnia Putra, A., Handoyo, B., Fajrilia, A., Naufal Islam, M., & Rafi Attamimi, M. (2022). Pengaruh Digital Learning And Digital Games Training Terhadap Kompetensi Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru SMA (Effects Of Digital Learning And Digital Games Training On The Senior High School Teachers’ Technological Pedagogy Content Knowle. Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi (JPDS, 5(1), 14–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um022v5i1p14-20
LaDue, N. D. & S. K. C. (2012). Education Perspective on Earth System Science Literacy: Challenges and Priorities. Journal Of Geoscience Education, 60, 372–383. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1164219.pdf
Maryani, E., & Maharani, W. (2015). Peningkatan Spatial Literacy Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 15(1), 46–54.
McGee, M. G. (1979a). Human spatial abilities : sources of sex differences. 144.
McGee, M. G. (1979b). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889
Memmase, J. Z. (2023). Pengaruh Model Earthcomm Menggunakan Google Earth Pro Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Mendalam Pada Pelajaran Geografi. http://repository.um.ac.id/281422/
Nisa, K., Soekamto, H., Wagistina, S., & Suharto, Y. (2021). Model Pembelajaran EarthComm pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi: Pengaruhnya terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Spasial Siswa SMA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 4(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v4i3.40031
Nofirman. (2018). Studi Kemampuan Spasial Geografi Siswa Kelas XII SMA Negeri 6 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Georafflesia, 3(2), 11–24. https://journals.unihaz.ac.id/index.php/georafflesia
Oktavianto, D. A. (2017). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Berbantuan Google Earth Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Spasial. Jurnal Teknodik, 1, 059. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v21i1.227
Park, D.-Y., Yager, R. E., & Smith, M. (2005). Implementing EarthComm: Teacher Professional Development and Its Impact on Student Achievement Scores in a Standards-Based Earth Science Curriculum. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 9(3), 1–20. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=507976806&site=ehost-live
Patterson, T. C. (2007). Google earth as a (not just) geography education tool. Journal of Geography, 106(4), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340701678032
Payong, Marselus, R. (2011). Sertifikasi Profesi Guru: Konsep dasar, Problematika dan Implementasinya. PT Indeks.
Purwanto, P., Utaya, S., Handoyo, B., Bachri, S., Yulistiya, D., & Amin, S. (2021). The Spatial Thinking Ability Students on the Character of Urban and Rural Environments in Solving Population Problems. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.877708
Putra, A. K., Soekamto, H., Masruroh, H., Handoyo, B., Luana, P., & Syaibana, D. (2022). Pelatihan Gamification Berbasis Game-Based Virtual Learning. 6, 2075–2081. https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jpmb/article/view/12084/5869
Putra, A. K., Sumarmi, Deffinika, I., & Islam, M. N. (2021). The Effect of Blended Project-Based Learning with Stem Approach to Spatial Thinking Ability and Geographic Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14340a
Putra, A. K., Sumarmi, S., Handoyo, B., Purwanto, P., & Islam, M. N. (2021). Pengembangan virtual field trips berbasis Geospatial Technology: Peningkatan kompetensi TPACK guru melalui GeoEdu Workshop. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (JIHI3S), 1(12), 1354–1363. https://doi.org/10.17977/um063v1i12p1354-1363
Rosalin, E. (2008). Guru dalam meningkatkan daya pikir siswa. Manajemen Pendidikan UNY, 1(1), 1–16. https://www.neliti.com/publications/112335/guru-dalam-meningkatkan-daya-pikir-siswa
Sari, L., Asiyah, S., Murjainah, M., & Wardiah, D. (2020). Studi Kemampuan Berfikir Spasial Siswa Kelas X Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi Di Sma Negeri 2 Muara Pinang. JURNAL SWARNABHUMI : Jurnal Geografi dan Pembelajaran Geografi, 5(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.31851/swarnabhumi.v5i1.3221
Sennen, E. (2017). Problematika Kompetensi Dan Profesionalisme Guru. Prosiding seminar nasional himpunan Dosen PGSD Wilayah IV, 16–21.
Silalahi, U. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 11(3), 287–301.
Sitorus, P., Simanullang, E. N., Manalu, A., Laia, I. S. A., Tumanggor, R. M., & Nainggolan, J. (2022). Effect of Differentiation Learning Strategies on Student Learning Results. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2654–2661. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2114
Sugiyono. (2017). Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pemaparan Metodenpenelitian Kuantitatif, 2, 16.
Sujarwo. (2000). Pendidikan di Indonesia Memprihatinkan. 1645, 1–76.
Sumarmi. (2012). Model-Model Pembelajaran Geografi. Aditya Media Publishing.
Sun, R., Wu, Y. J., & Cai, Q. (2019). The effect of a virtual reality learning environment on learners’ spatial ability. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0355-2
Thinking, N. R. C. C. on S. (2005). Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. In Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019
Tri Mawarni, W., Alfiansyah, M., & Zahra, F. (2022). Education and Learning Journal. Universitas Muslim Indonesia, 1(January), 106–113. https://jurnal.fai.umi.ac.id/index.php/eljour/
UNIMED, S. P. F., & Sinabariba, R. (2017). Peranan Guru Memilih Model-Model Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Puisi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar Universitas Negeri Medan 2017, 1–10.
Urrochman, A. . (2021). Problematika Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Masa Pandemi pada Pembelajaran Geografi Kelas XI IPS 2 SMA Negeri 2 Klaten.
Vita Romadon Ningrum, M., & Kholiq, E. (2018). The Influence of Earth Science Community Learning Model (EARTHCOMM) To Learning Outcomes of Geography. 144, 48–50. https://doi.org/10.2991/icedutech-17.2018.8
Webster, M. L. (2014). Gis in Ap Human Geraphy: a Means of Developing Students’ Spatial Thinking? Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 5(2), 40–51.
Yilmaz, H. B. (2009). On the development and measurement of spatial ability. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 83–96.
Zulfikar, T. (2018). The Making of Indonesian Education: An overview on Empowering Indonesian Teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(June), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v2i0.19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/geography.v12i1.21845
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
GEOGRAPHY : Jurnal Kajian Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan
Email: [email protected] | p-ISSN 2339-2835 | e-ISSN 2614-5529
EDITORIAL OFFICE: