Safety Citizenship Behaviors (SCBs) BUMDesa Managers through Tourism Management in Sumenep Regency
Abstract
Abstract: Risk management is an integral part of a business because it has a high environmental, human, legal, and financial impact, including the tourism business. Today's organizations focus on building human risk management systems, limiting risky behaviour, and improving safety behaviour. Based on previous research, compliance with safety rules and regulations significantly minimizes the risk of work accidents. However, safety researchers recognize that compliance alone is not enough to achieve high levels of safety. Organizations need individuals who are also proactive in participating and initiating safety improvements. This type of proactive behaviour is called safety citizenship behaviour. The present study addressed this issue by examining the dimensionality of SCBs as they relate to helping, stewardship, civic virtue, whistleblowing, voice, and initiating change in current practices. Data on SCBs were collected from four districts in Madura. This study was carried out with the following: (1) Calculate descriptive statistics (2) normality test; (3) The use of the structural equation model (SEM) to test concurrent models in the different samples using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA); and (4) multi-group invariance testing.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Banbury, S. (2017). A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application. A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application, January 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315263977
Curcuruto, M., Conchie, S. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2019). Safety citizenship behavior (SCB) in the workplace: A stable construct? Analysis of psychometric invariance across four European countries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 129(June), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.023
Curcuruto, M., & Griffin, M. A. (2018). Prosocial and proactive “safety citizenship behaviour” (SCB): The mediating role of affective commitment and psychological ownership. Safety Science, 104(September 2016), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.010
Curcuruto, M., Parker, S. K., & Griffin, M. A. (2019). Proactivity towards workplace safety improvement: an investigation of its motivational drivers and organizational outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1572115
Dejoy, D. M., Della, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Wilson, M. G. (2010). Making work safer : Testing a model of social exchange and safety management ☆. Journal of Safety Research, 41(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.001
Dejoy, D. M., Schaffer, B. S., Wilson, M. G., Vandenberg, R. J., & Butts, M. M. (2004). Creating safer workplaces : assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. 35, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
Didla, S., Mearns, K., & Flin, R. (2009). Safety citizenship behaviour: A proactive approach to risk management. Journal of Risk Research, 12(3–4), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903041433
Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.170
Jiang, L., Li, F., Li, Y. J., & Li, R. (2017). Leader-member exchange and safety citizenship behavior: The mediating role of coworker trust. Work, 56(3), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172504
Neal, A., Griffin, M. A., & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Journal Individual Behaviour, 34(1), 99–109.
Reader, T. W., Mearns, K., Lopes, C., & Kuha, J. (2017). Organizational support for the workforce and employee safety citizenship behaviors: A social exchange relationship. Human Relations, 70(3), 362–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716655863
Wishart, D., Rowland, B., & Somoray, K. (2019). Safety citizenship behavior: A complementary paradigm to improving safety culture within the organizational driving setting. Traffic Safety Culture: Definition, Foundation, and Application, April, 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191011
Xia, N., Xie, Q., Griffin, M. A., Ye, G., & Yuan, J. (2020). Antecedents of safety behavior in construction: A literature review and an integrated conceptual framework. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 148(August), 105834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105834
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite, 96, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPET.2015.09.017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v7i4.29409
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JUSTEK : Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi sudah terindeks