From Close Reading to Algorithmic Reading: Literary Pedagogy in the Digital Age

I Wayan Artika

Abstract


Abstract: Literary education has historically developed within a predominantly print-based culture. Within this environment, literary works have generally been treated as stable textual objects. One of the most influential practices has been close reading, namely the careful and intensive reading of the formal and linguistic elements of a literary work. Digital technologies, however, have transformed the medium through which literature is presented, as well as the processes of literary creation, authorship, reading, distribution, and reception. Literature now takes a wide variety of forms, including e-books, web fiction, fan fiction, electronic literature, digital poetry, interactive narratives, multimodal works, social media literature, and works produced or assisted by artificial intelligence. This paper argues that digital literary pedagogy should not be understood merely as the use of digital devices in literature education; rather, it requires a conceptual expansion of literary reading itself. Close reading remains important, but it needs to be complemented by media-aware reading, multimodal reading, algorithmic reading, and creative digital production. Students need to be taught to understand not only what a literary work says, but also how its medium, interface, platform, algorithms, and mechanisms of distribution shape the literary experience. This paper proposes a Five-Layer Digital Literary Pedagogy model consisting of: (1) close reading, (2) media-aware reading, (3) multimodal reading, (4) algorithmic reading, and (5) creative digital production.

Keywords


digital literary pedagogy, literature education, electronic literature, digital reading, multimodality, algorithmic reading, artificial intelligence.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bennis, M. (2024). Teaching literature in the digital age: Some theoretical reflections. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i3.1747

Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269

Hayles, N. K. (2002). Writing machines. MIT Press.

Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Digital media and contemporary technogenesis. University of Chicago Press.

Ikeda, M., & Rech, G. (2022). Does the digital world open up an increasing divide in access to print books? PISA in Focus, 118. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/54f9d8f7-en

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Spjeldnæs, K. (2022). Platformization and publishing: Changes in literary publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38, 782–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09912-2

Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Harvard University Press.

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.

Love, P. (2010). Close reading and the commitment to difficult thinking. College English, 72(4), 371–385.

Darnton, R. (1982). What is the history of books? Daedalus, 111(3), 65–83.

Foxman, M. (2023). Digital text. In A. Hammond (Ed.), Technology and literature (pp. 141–160). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108560740.009

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Reiber-Kuijpers, M., Kral, M., & Meijer, P. (2021). Digital reading in a second or foreign language: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104115

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Love, H. (2010). Close reading and thin description. Public Culture, 22(3), 371–384.

Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x

Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902989227

Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. The MIT Press.

OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Grigar, D., & O'Sullivan, J. (Eds.). (2021). Electronic literature as digital humanities: Contexts, forms, and practices. Bloomsbury Academic.

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Murray, J. H. (2017). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace (Updated ed.). MIT Press.

Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694

Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425

Rettberg, S. (2019). Electronic literature. Polity.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Committee:

[email protected]

  • Dr. Syaharuddin : +62 878-6400-3847
  • Dr. Intan Dwi Hastuti : +62 812-1611-9880