Implementasi KUHAP Dalam Pelaksanaan Upaya Paksa Terhadap Tersangka Kasus Korupsi Pada Proyek SPAM Buntu Burake Oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Tana Toraja

Nellan Masirri, Ahmad Aswar Rowa, Budi Arta Pradana Nongtji

Abstract


This study aims to examine the application of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) regarding the use of coercive measures against the suspect in the Buntu Burake Drinking Water Supply System (SPAM) corruption case by the Tana Toraja District Attorney's Office, and to analyze the legal basis for these measures. This is an empirical legal study employing a socio-legal (juridical-empirical) approach, conducted at the Tana Toraja District Attorney's Office. Data were collected through interviews, observation, documentation, and literature review, and subsequently analyzed qualitatively. The results indicate that the application of the KUHAP regarding coercive measures against the suspect in the Buntu Burake SPAM corruption case was carried out through investigative stages involving the collection of project documents, witness examinations, the gathering of evidence, the formal naming of the suspect, and the seizure of documents and evidence related to the case. The naming of the suspect was based on at least two pieces of valid evidence, in accordance with Article 184 of the KUHAP and Constitutional Court Decision Number 21/PUU-XII/2014. The legal basis for implementing these coercive measures refers to Article 1 point 2, Article 1 point 14, Article 38, and Article 184 of the KUHAP, as well as Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, the application of the KUHAP regarding coercive measures against the suspect in the Buntu Burake SPAM corruption case by the Tana Toraja District Attorney's Office has been carried out in accordance with applicable criminal procedural law provisions.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alkostar, A. (2009). Korelasi Korupsi Politik Dengan Hukum dan Pemerintahan di Negara Modern ( Telaah tentang Praktik Korupsi Politik dan Penanggulangannya ). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 16, 155–179. https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/3871/3446

Allang, A., & Hanafi, H. A. (2016). KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DALAM UPAYA MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP ANAK DARI TINDAK KEKERASAN (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I A Palu). Hukum, 4(8), 1–23.

C.Aturkian Laia, H. & F. (2024). Rekonstruksi Peran Kejaksaan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Upaya Penyitaan dan Perampasan Aset. CV JEJAK.

Ibrahim, J. E. & J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. Prenadamedia Group.

Jawa, D., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Tantangan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Corruption Criminal Law Enforcement Challenges in Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 6–7.

Lamijan, I., & Undaris, M. T. (2022). Dampak Korupsi Terhadap Pembangunan. Penelitian Hukum Indonesia, 3(02), 40–59.

Margo Hadi Pura, & Faridah, H. (2021). Asas Akusator Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Tersangka Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 7(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i1.536

Moh. Anakta Umbasan Walujan,Syachdin, A. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Syarat Subjektif Dalam Penahanan Penyidik Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Toposantoro, 1(127–133).

Pratidina, N., & ... (2025). … Dilakukan Tim Penyidik Dalam Proses Pra-Penuntutan Berdasarkan Perspektif Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan. Jurnal Media …, 3(7). https://jurnal.mediaakademik.com/index.php/jma/article/view/2648%0Ahttps://jurnal.mediaakademik.com/index.php/jma/article/download/2648/2088

Riski, M., Setiyono, S., & Suratman, T. (2021). Upaya Jaksa dalam Penyelidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi pada Kejaksaan Negeri Malang). MLJ Merdeka Law Journal, 2(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v2i2.7158

Sahidu, F., Harun, R. R., & Erwin, Y. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Proses Penetapan Status Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 5(3), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i3.24633

Siahaan, Y. A., Mulyadi, M., & Tarigan, V. C. E. (2025). Peran Kejaksaan Negeri Humbang Hasundutan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Wilayah Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan ( Studi Putusan Nomor 91 / Pid-Sus Tpk / 2024 / Pn . Mdn ). 4(9), 2465–2476.

Vivi Nur Qalbi, Andi Nurul Isnawidiawinarti Achmad, K. Z. A. (2025). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Narkotika Melalui Restorative Justice: Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Tinggi Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.2005

Wahid, A., Jubair, J., Rampadio, H., & Malarangan, K. (2024). Restoration of Children’s Rights after Imprisonment in the Perspective of State Responsibility. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 3(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2024.3.4.146

Wijanarko, A. S. & D. S. (2024). Buku Ajar Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PT. Literasi Nusantara Abadi Grup.

Wijaya, A., & Ruslie, A. (2024). Kendala dan Permasalahan dalam Rehabilitasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Journal Evidence Of Law, 3(3), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v3i3.690




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v4i2.40697

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing Site

Jl. KH. Ahmad Dahlan No.1, Pagesangan, Kec. Mataram, Kota Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat.

rajamacau

boladana