Penguatan Karakter di Era Literasi Digital melalui Multiliteracy Integrative Learning Model
Abstract
Abstract: Character building is a crucial aspect of 21st-century education, particularly in the digital era, as students are frequently exposed to various digital content. However, its implementation still faces various challenges in the school environment, particularly in learning contexts that do not fully support the internalization of character values. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Multiliteracy Integrative Learning Model in strengthening students' character formation, particularly in terms of honesty, discipline, and responsibility. This study used a descriptive quantitative approach with observation sheets as the main instrument. The research subjects consisted of students from two high schools selected purposively. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with average calculations to interpret students' character tendencies. The results showed that students' character values were formed through teacher guidance interactions and habituation in the learning environment. In general, students showed a positive tendency in developing honesty, discipline, and responsibility, although more systematic and continuous reinforcement is needed in the learning process.
Abstrak: Penguatan karakter merupakan aspek krusial dalam pendidikan abad ke-21, khususnya di era digital, karena pada era ini siswa kerap terpapar berbagai konten digital. Namun, penerapannya masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan di lingkungan sekolah, terutama dalam konteks pembelajaran yang belum sepenuhnya mendukung internalisasi nilai-nilai karakter. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas Multiliteracy Integrative Learning Model dalam memperkuat pembentukan karakter siswa, khususnya dalam hal kejujuran, disiplin, dan tanggung jawab.. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan lembar observasi sebagai instrumen utama. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas siswa dari dua sekolah menengah atas yang dipilih secara purposive. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dengan perhitungan rata-rata untuk menginterpretasi kecenderungan karakter siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai karakter siswa terbentuk melalui interaksi bimbingan guru, dan pembiasaan dalam lingkungan pembelajaran. Secara umum, siswa menunjukkan kecenderungan positif dalam mengembangkan sikap jujur, disiplin, dan bertanggung jawab, meskipun diperlukan penguatan yang lebih sistematis dan berkelanjutan dalam proses pembelajaran.
Keywords
Full Text:
DOWNLOAD [PDF]References
Ata, R., & Yildirim, K. (2019). Exploring turkish pre-service teachers’ perceptions and views of digital literacy. Education Sciences, 9(40), 1–16.
Atmazaki, Agustina, Indriyani, V., & Abdurahman. (2020). Teachers percerption of character education integration in language learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(2), 149–160.
Barnard, A. (2011). The competencies of integrity. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21(2), 267–273.
Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In M. Lankshear, C. and Knobel (Ed.), Digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.
Bergmark, U. (2008). I want people to believe in me, listen when i say something and remember me - how students wish to be treated. Pastoral Care in Education, 26(4), 267–279.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131–142.
Budimansyah, D. (2020). The elementary school students’ responsibility character analysis. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 4874–4877.
Camilli-Trujillo, C., & Römer-Pieretti, M. (2017). Meta-synthesis of literacy for the empowerment of vulnerable groups. Comunicar, 53(XXV), 09–18.
Çocuk, H. E., & Yelken, T. Y. (2018). The effect of the web based digital story applications on the digital literacy levels of turkish teacher candidates. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 132–136.
Dalton, E. M. (2017). Beyond universal design for learning: guiding principles to reduce barriers to digital & media literacy competence. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(2), 17—29.
Duff, P. (2004). Teaching and assessing professionalism in medicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104(6), 1362–1366.
Flores-Bravo, J. F., Rodríguez-Naveiras, E., Valadez Sierra, M. D. L. D., Costantini, D., & Borges, Á. (2025). Differences in personality between high-ability and average-ability university students. Journal of Intelligence, 13(1). 7
Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441-449..
Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55—69.
I’tikaf, M. A. (2024). Integrasi teknologi dalam pendidikan karakter: Membangun generasi berkarakter di era digital. Al-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1837–1847.
Indriyani, V., & Ramadhan, S. (2017). The development teaching of writing fable text module with project based learning (PjBL) containing characters. 2nd Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2017), 20–25.
Kamaruddin, N., Abidin, S. Z., & Rozmi, A. N. A. (2014). Issues and challenges in implementing entrepreneurial Students Character building (SCB) activities: A study at UniKL BMI. 2014 4th International Conference on Engineering Technology and Technopreneuship, ICE2T 2014, 10–14.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.
Leekitchwatana, P. (2017). Development of competency factors for information technology. KKU Research Journal, 15(11), 1101—1113.
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: A review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358.
Mills, M. S. (2013). Facilitating multimodal literacy instruction through digital curation. In & C. W. H. J. Whittingham, S. Huffman, W. Rickman (Ed.), Technological tools for the literacy classroom (pp. 46–63). Idea Group Inc (IGI).
Myhailovych, H. I. (2019). Personal Determinants of Responsi Bility of Future Educators. Insight: the psychological dimensions of society, (1), 15-21..
Seider, S., Gilbert, J. K., Novick, S., & Gomez, J. (2013). The role of moral and performance character strengths in predicting achievement and conduct among urban middle school students. Teachers College Record, 115(8). 1-34
Sosik, J. J., Chun, J. U., & Ete, Z. (2020). Character and leadership. in the wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Clinical, Applied and Cross-Cultural Research, 4, 505–510.
Staats, S., Hupp, J. M., Wallace, H., & Gresley, J. (2009). Heroes don’t cheat: An examination of academic dishonesty and students’ views on why professors don’t report cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 19(3), 171–183.
Sugiarto, & Farid, A. (2023). Literasi Digital Sebagai Jalan Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Di Era Society 5.0. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(3), 580–597.
Surmelioglu, Y., & Seferoglu, S. S. (2019). An examination of digital footprint awareness and digital experiences of higher education students. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 048–064.
Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of E‐Learning, 14(1), 54‐65.
Tutkun, T., & Kincal, R. Y. (2019). The relationship between the teacher candidates’ level of media literacy and participation levels to protest and social change. International Education Studies, 12(4), 208–216.
Wardman, N. P. (2017). ‘So you can’t blame us then?’: gendered discourses of masculine irresponsibility as biologically determined and peer-pressured in upper-primary school contexts. Gender and Education, 29(6), 796–812.
Widana, I. W., Citrawan, I. W., & Sumandya, I. W. (2023). The effect of teacher’s responsibility and understanding of the local wisdom concept on teacher’s autonomy in developing evaluation of learning based on local wisdom in special needs school. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(10), 152–167.
Xie, J., Lin, R., Jeng, Y.-C., & Li, J. (2010). How different personality types are related to perception of professional ethics. IET Conference Publications, 241–246.
Yulmiati, Y., Indriyani, V., Zaim, M., Ramadhan, S., & Agustina, A. (2021). Teacher’s perception on building character by integrating islamic values into foreign language lesson in indonesian context. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 7(2), 302–314.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v8i3.33552
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Vivi Indriyani, Delsy Arma Putri, Rizka Dwi Rahmayani, Justitiayu Novelly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Contact Admin:
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +62 853-3397-5477
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Pendekar : Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter already indexed:
