Strategi Pembangunan Reformasi Birokrasi Guna Mewujudkan Organisasi Bebas Korupsi dan Pelayanan Publik Optimal

Faonaso Refa Harefa; Cecilia F. Harsono

doi:10.31764/jiap.v13i1.29534

Strategi Pembangunan Reformasi Birokrasi Guna Mewujudkan Organisasi Bebas Korupsi dan Pelayanan Publik Optimal

Faonaso Refa Harefa, Cecilia F. Harsono

Abstract

This article aims to formulate the influence of the Integrity Zone launch strategy in the sub-work unit of the Ministry of Defense's Research and Development Agency (Balitbang) to accelerate Bureaucratic Recalibration and realize the Public Integrity Zone. To obtain comprehensive results, this article uses a mixed approach, combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Data were collected through discussions, technical guidance, in-depth interviews with Experts, and document analysis. Qualitative data were processed using NVivo and Quantitative data using a structural system model. The study shows that the Integrity Zone launch strategy improves employee understanding and roles in managing a clean and accountable organization. In addition, bureaucratic productivity and efficiency significantly increased as a result of the involvement of leaders in providing strategic direction, the benefits of guidance from resource persons who have achieved Public Integrity Zone status, and active participation of employees who play an active role in being responsible for preparing their work units to become areas for the Integrity Zone (ZI). These findings indicate that the launch of the Integrity Zone is very important to help organizations adapt to environmental changes and technological advances. The limitation of this study lies in the scope of the analysis which is limited to the sub-work units of the Ministry of Defense's Research and Development Agency, so that generalization of the results to all ministries requires caution. This study provides original value by recommending the expansion of the implementation of the Integrity Zone to organizational units of the Indonesian National Army to accelerate the achievement of comprehensive bureaucratic reform within the Ministry of Defense. In conclusion, the launch of the Integrity Zone is a strategic step towards a clean organization, and oriented towards public service.

Keywords

Bureaucratic reform; Integrity zone; Public services 4. Ministry of Defense 5. TNI

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adiananto, Y., Widjajani, R., & Sholahuddin, A. (2024). Implementation of Integrity Zones towards Clean Bureaucracy in the Lamandau State. International Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities, 05(02), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.47505/ijrss.2024.2.1

Agarwal, A., & Raghav, D. (2024). Modelling Key Drivers of Employee Behaviour for Personal and Professional Excellence. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 17(May), 2179–2194. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S448469

Ahmad, N., & Qahmash, A. (2021). Smartism: Implementation and assessment of interpretive structural modeling. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168801

Almeida, F. (2018). Strategies to Perform a Mixed Methods Study. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406214

Anggadi, F. (2022). Establishment, Notification, and Maintenance: The Package of State Practice at the Heart of the Pacific Islands Forum Declaration on Preserving Maritime Zones. Ocean Development and International Law, 53(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2022.2033143

Asatryan, Z., Heinemann, F., & Pitlik, H. (2017). Reforming the public administration: The role of crisis and the power of bureaucracyThe need to balance austerity with growth policies has put government efficiency high on the economic policy agenda in Europe. Administrative reforms that boost the intern. European Journal of Political Economy, 48(15), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.08.004

Azevedo, S. G., Sequeira, T., Santos, M., & Mendes, L. (2019). Biomass-related sustainability: A review of the literature and interpretive structural modeling. Energy, 171(2019), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.068

Birokrasi, R., Korupsi, W. B., Birokrasi, W., & Melayani, B. (2024). 1 , 2 1,2. 5(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v5i2.42485

Chen, J. K. (2021). Improved DEMATEL-ISM integration approach for complex systems. PLoS ONE, 16(7 July), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254694

Collignon, P., Athukorala, P. C., Senanayake, S., & Khan, F. (2015). Antimicrobial resistance: The major contribution of poor governance and corruption to this growing problem. PLoS ONE, 10(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116746

Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Gobierno algorítmico - Automatización de los servicios públicos y apoyo a los funcionarios públicos en el uso de tecnologías de ciencia de datos. Computer Journal, 62(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082%0Ahttps://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/62/3/448/50703 84

Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah-Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development, 105, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015

Gedeona, H. T., & Trilestari, E. W. (2021). The Model for Implementing Bureaucratic Reform in the Ministry of Administrative Reform. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), 564(Icas 2020), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.028

Gupta, S., Sharma, J., Najm, M., & Sharma, S. (2020). Media Exaggeration and Information Credibility: Qualitative Analysis of Fear Generation for Covid- 19 Using Nvivo. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 12, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.20/03

Kusrini, E., Safitri, W., & Helia, V. N. (2019). Identify Key Success Factors Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) : A Case Study in Small and Medium Enterprise in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 697(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/697/1/012015

Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502

Lecuna, A. (2012). Corruption and size decentralization. Journal of Applied Economics, 15(1), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(12)60007-5

Lesmana, D., Rosadi, B., Hermana, D., Liu, R., & Winarno, A. (2022). Analyzing the Effect of Bureaucratic Leadership on Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Journal of Local Government Issues, 5(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i2.20904

Munawir, A., June, T., Kusmana, C., Setiawan, Y., Setiawan, Y., Setiawan, Y., & Setiawan, Y. (2020). Environmental Institution Improvement Using Interpretative Structural Modeling (Ism) Techniques in Lore Lindu National Park (Llnp), Central of Sulawesi Province-Indonesia. Plant Archives, 21(supplement 1), 2421–2427. https://doi.org/10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.s1.395

O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860

Oliveira, E., Abner, G., Lee, S., Suzuki, K., Hur, H., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102(2), 668–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12945

Pokorny, J. J., Norman, A., Zanesco, A. P., Bauer-Wu, S., Sahdra, B. K., & Saron, C. D. (2018). Network analysis for the visualization and analysis of qualitative data. Psychological Methods, 23(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000129

Rayev, J. ’, Tojimamatovich, V., Mohidil, A., & Qizi, H. (2022). Working With Geospatial and Descriptive Data in A Geoinformation System. 11(2720), 113–116. https://periodica.com

Sahoo, S. K., Sahoo, T. R., & Satpathy, B. (2020). Virtual buyer-seller interaction is the true driver of online purchase-intention: A study by ISM approach. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(3), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.31838/JCR.07.03.114

Sartor, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2020). Private Sector Corruption, Public Sector Corruption and the Organizational Structure of Foreign Subsidiaries. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(4), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04148-1

Sharma, R., & Gupta, S. (2021). Bharat Towards Atmanirbharta: a Twitter Based Analysis Using Nvivo. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 13(7), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.06.21/07

Simangunsong, F., & Hutasoit, I. (2018). A study of the development of natuna regency as a key site on Indonesia’s outer border with particular regard to national defense and security issues in the South China Sea. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 7(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.21463/jmic.2018.07.2.04

Tan, T., Chen, K., Xue, F., & Lu, W. (2019). Barriers to Building Information Modeling (BIM) implementation in China’s prefabricated construction: An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.141

Tang, Z., Zhou, Z., & Warkentin, M. (2022). A contextualized comprehensive action determination model for predicting consumer electronics recommerce platform usage: A sequential mixed-methods approach. Information and Management, 59(3), 0–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103617

Tiwisia, V., Setiawan, A. W., & Triono, A. (2020). Bureaucratic Reform of Indonesia Attorney: Building Integrity of Law Enforcement and Improving Public Trust. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(6), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v10n6a15

Trein, P., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The Integration and Coordination of Public Policies: A Systematic Comparative Review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2018.1496667

Treves, A., Chapron, G., López-Bao, J. V., Shoemaker, C., Goeckner, A. R., & Bruskotter, J. T. (2017). Predators and the public trust. Biological Reviews, 92(1), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12227

Umar, Setyosari, P., Kamdi, W., & Sulton. (2021). Exploration of moral integrity education and superior cadre leadership at madrasah boarding school indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 753–774. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14443a

Widodo, W., Budoyo, S., & Pratama, T. G. W. (2018). The role of law politics on creating good governance and clean governance for a free-corruption Indonesia in 2030. The Social Sciences, 13(8), 1307–1311. https://doi.org/10.36478/sscience.2018.1307.1311

Williams, M. J. (2021). Beyond state capacity: Bureaucratic performance, policy implementation and reform. Journal of Institutional Economics, 17(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137420000478

Wu, J., & Walker, R. M. (2020). Public management in China: reform, innovation and governance. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), v–ix. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1784646

Yudha Bramantyo, R., & Yuliastuti, N. (2022). Bureaucracy Reform for Improving Good Governance Through One Stop Service. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(6), 655–664. http://journalppw.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jiap.v13i1.29534