Developing Students' Science Literacy Skills Through Science Literacy Learning Environment

Siska Merrydian, Wardani Rahayu, Riyadi Riyadi

Abstract


Abstract: The ability of science literacy needs to be developed because it is a competency required as a 21st-century life skill. The ability of science literacy can be developed through a science literacy learning environment applied in school learning activities. The purpose of this research is to identify the dimensions that support the development of students' science literacy skills through a science literacy learning environment. This research uses the literature review method, which is a method of synthesizing, identifying, and evaluating the works or research results and thoughts produced by other researchers in a specific context. The science literacy learning environment can develop students' science literacy skills through the application of several psychosocial aspects, which consist of personal growth, relationship, and system maintenance and change aspects. In the aspect of personal growth, it consists of the dimensions of communication, representation, investigation, and cooperation. In the aspect of relationship, it consists of the dimensions of teacher support and involvement. In the aspect of system maintenance and change, it consists of the dimension of equity. The development of the science literacy learning environment dimension can have a very significant impact on students' understanding of science literacy concepts.


Keywords


Science Literacy; Learning Environment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arianti. (2017). Urgensi Lingkungan Belajar yang Kondusif Dalam Mendorong Siswa Belajar Aktif. Didaktika Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.51903/education.v2i1.148

Bizimana, E., Mutangana, D., & Mwesigye, A. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Classroom Learning Environment and Engagement in Cooperative Mastery Learning Based Biology Classroom Instruction. Education Research International, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5793394

Cai, J., Wen, Q., Lombaerts, K., Jaime, I., & Cai, L. (2022). Assessing Students’ Perceptions About Classroom Learning Environments: The New What Is Happening In this Class (NWIHIC) Instrument. Learning Environments Research, 25(2), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09383-w

Chang, J., Faikhamta, C., Na, J., & Song, J. (2018). A comparison of science classroom environments between Korea and Thailand with a focus on their cultural features. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0028-1

Che Lah, N. H., Tasir, Z., & Jumaat, N. F. (2022). An Evaluation of the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI) Using Rasch Model Analysis. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104083

Davies, S. R. (2021). An Empirical and Conceptual Note on Science Communication’s Role in Society. Science Communication, 43(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971642

Dweck, C. S. (2006). The New Psychology of Success. In Random House.

Eser, M. T., & Aktan, D. C. (2021). Educational Data Mining: The Analysis of the Factors Affecting Science Instruction by Clustering Analysis. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.487

Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mantyla, T. (2015). The Role of Visual Representations in Scientific Practices: from Conceptual Understanding and Knowledge Generation to ‘Seeing’ How Science Works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., Roysa, M., Rusilowati, A., & Rahayu, E. S. (2017). Student’s science literacy in the aspect of content science? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.7245

Fischhoff, B. (2013). The Sciences of Science Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(SUPPL. 3), 14033–14039. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110

Fraser, B. J. (2023). The Evolution of the Field of Learning Environments Research. Education Sciences, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030257

Gupta, A., & Sharma, P. (2023). An assessment of the learning environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour at the teacher education level. Effective Teaching Around the World: Theoretical, Empirical, Methodological and Practical Insights, 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31678-4_12

Gupta, S. (2020). Science and its usage in daily life. 8(1), 85–88.

Hallez, J. E. (2008). The Importance of Science in the Classroom and Implications for Teaching Science Effectively.

Hanfstingl, B., Gnambs, T., Porsch, R., & Jude, N. (2024). Exploring the association between non-specialised science teacher rates and student science literacy: an analysis of PISA data across 18 nations. International Journal of Science Education, 46(9), 874–892. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2262729

Hardinata, A., Putri, R. E., & Permanasari, A. (2019). Gender difference and scientific literacy level of secondary student: A study on global warming theme. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022016

Herianingtyas, N. L. R. (2022). Penguatan Literasi Sains Siswa MI/SD melalui Pengembangan E-Modul dengan Instrumen Asesmen berbasis Higher Order Thingking Skills. Elementar : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.15408/elementar.v2i1.28353

Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The Impact of School Environments: A literature review. Design Council, January, 47. http://128.240.233.197/cflat/news/DCReport.pdf

Hussain Malik, R., & Abbas Rizvi, A. (2018). Effect of Classroom Learning Environment on Students’Academic Achievement in Mathematics at Secondary Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 40(2), 207–218.

Irawan, M. N. L., Yasir, A., Anita, & Hasan, S. (2022). Strategi Lembaga Pendidikan Islam Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Pendidikan Kontemporer. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4, 1349–1358.

Kang, J. (2022). Interrelationship Between Inquiry-Based Learning and Instructional Quality in Predicting Science Literacy. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6

Khery, Y., Sarjan, M., Ahzan, S., & Efendi, I. (2022). Konseptualisasi Literasi Sains Mengacu pada Kerangka Sains Pisa Sejak Tahun 2000. Educatoria : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(4), 200–231. https://doi.org/10.36312/ejiip.v2i4.117

Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., & Afari, E. (2020). Structural relationships between learning environments and students’ non-cognitive outcomes: secondary analysis of PISA data. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09313-2

Klosterman, P., & Stein, S. (2023). A Comparison of The University Mathematics Learning Environment With Its High School Equivalent. Learning Environments Research, 26(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09435-9

Latief, A. (2023). Peranan Pentingnya Lingkungan Belajar Bagi Anak. Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 104–116.

Lee, A. (2023). The Importance of Cultivating Awareness of Environmental Matters in Science Classrooms: A Cross Regional Study. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.7

Mariyana, R., & Setiasih, O. (2018). Penataan Lingkungan Belajar Terpadu Untuk Meningkatkan Potensi Kecerdasan Jamak Anak. Pedagogia, 15(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v15i3.11020

Moeed, A. (2015). Science Laboratory Learning Environment, and Learning. 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-384-2_2

Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyo, L. (2022). The cross-cultural validation of the technology-enhanced social constructivist learning environment questionnaire in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. In Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 17, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00199-7

Moos, R. H. E. T. (1974). Classroom Environment Scale Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Norambuena Melendez, M., Guerrero, G. R., & Gonzalez Weil, C. (2023). What is Meant by Scientific Literacy in The Curriculum? A Comparative Analysis Between Bolivia and Chile. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10190-3

Nugraeni, M. H., & Paidi. (2021). Instructional designs to promote scientific literacy on students and teachers: A review study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012042

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In Autistic States in Children. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090366

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.

Olander, C., Wickman, P. O., Tytler, R., & Ingerman, A. (2017). Representations as mediation between purposes as junior secondary science students learn about the human body. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1407464

Oo, C. Z., Khine, M. S., & San, N. M. H. (2022). A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of “What Is Happening in This Class?” (WIHIC) Questionnaire. Education Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120929

Pertiwi, U. D., Atanti, R. D., & Ismawati, R. (2018). Pentingnya Literasi Sains pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP Abad 21. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 1(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v1i1.173

Piaget, J. (1997). Development and Learning. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology (pp. 485–504). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429244629-30

Rizal. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Mind Map Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(4), 159–165. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jps

Robbia, A. Z., & Fuadi, H. (2020). Pengembangan Keterampilan Multimedia Interaktif Pembelajaran IPA Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik di Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.125

Ruyant, Q. (2024). Two Senses of Representation in Science. Theoria (Spain), 39(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.26040

Sangkala, N. R., & Doorman, L. M. (2019). The influence of inquiry-based learning on Indonesian students’ attitude towards science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032123

Sharkey, M., & Gash, H. (2020). Teachers’ Constructivist and Ethical Beliefs. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/BS10060096

Sukaria, M. I. (2024). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep Ion Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Four-tier Test Berbasis Representasi Jamak. 10(2), 155–162.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sutrisna, N. (2021). Mixed Method Writing. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(12), 2683–2694. https://www.chegg.com/writing/guides/research/mixed-methods-research/

Szpytma, C., & Szpytma, M. (2019). Model of 21st century physical learning environment (MoPLE21). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34(April), 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100591

Wulandari, F., Setiyawati, E., & Su’Udiyah, F. (2021). An Analysis of Teacher Candidates Scientific Literacy through Nature of Science (NoS) in Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012102

Yandi, A., Nathania Kani Putri, A., & Syaza Kani Putri, Y. (2023). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengarui Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik (Literature Review). Jurnal Pendidikan Siber Nusantara, 1(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.38035/jpsn.v1i1.14

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa. In Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas (Vol. 3, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v3i2.592

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis Rendahnya Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Indonesia: Hasil Pisa Dan Faktor Penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283

Zaturrahmi. (2019). Lingkungan Belajar Sebagai Pengelolaan Kelas: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. E-Tech, 00(00), XX–XX. https://doi.org/10.1007/XXXXXX-XX-0000-00

Zheng, Q., Yuan, Z., & Pan, X. (2024). Examining the influencing effect of EFL students’ digital literacy on their online learning power: the mediating role of perceived teacher support. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2404669

Zubaidah, S. (2019). STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics): Pembelajaran untuk memberdayakan keterampilan abad ke-21 [STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics): Learning to Empower 21st Century Skills]. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Sains, September, 1–18.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


------------------

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

  

Proceeding of International Seminar on Student Research in Education, Science, and Technology already indexed: