KEPEMIMPINAN DIGITAL DAN PERILAKU KERJA INOVATIF GENERASI Z: PERAN EFIKASI DIRI DAN BERBAGI PENGETAHUAN

Rona Xena Briela, M Halim

Abstract


Penelitian ini mengkaji hubungan antara kepemimpinan digital dan perilaku kerja inovatif pada karyawan Generasi Z dengan menguji mediation melalui efikasi diri dan berbagi pengetahuan, baik sebagai mediator individual maupun dalam sequential mediation. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjelaskan mekanisme yang menghubungkan kepemimpinan digital dengan perilaku kerja inovatif karyawan. Survei kuantitatif potong lintang dilakukan terhadap 201 karyawan Generasi Z berusia 18–29 tahun yang memiliki pengalaman kerja minimal enam bulan dan seorang atasan langsung. Responden dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, dan data dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hubungan langsung antara kepemimpinan digital dan perilaku kerja inovatif tidak signifikan secara statistik. Namun, kepemimpinan digital berhubungan positif dan signifikan dengan efikasi diri dan berbagi pengetahuan, sedangkan kedua variabel tersebut berhubungan positif dan signifikan dengan perilaku kerja inovatif. Hubungan tidak langsung yang signifikan juga ditemukan melalui efikasi diri dan berbagi pengetahuan, baik secara individual maupun berurutan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa hubungan antara kepemimpinan digital dan perilaku kerja inovatif terutama tampak melalui efikasi diri umum karyawan dan perilaku berbagi pengetahuan.


Keywords


kepemimpinan digital, perilaku kerja inovatif, efikasi diri, berbagi pengetahuan, Generasi Z

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, F., Naqshbandi, M. M., Waheed, M., & Ain, N. U. (2024). Digital leadership and innovative work behavior: Impact of LMX, learning orientation and innovation capabilities. Management Decision, 62(11), 3607–3632. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0654

Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

Argote, L. (2024). Knowledge transfer within organizations: Mechanisms, motivation, and consideration. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-105424

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydın, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338

Fida, R., Marzocchi, I., Arshad, M., Paciello, M., Barbaranelli, C., & Tramontano, C. (2025). Self-efficacy and nontask performance at work. A meta-analytic summary. Personality and Individual Differences, 241, 113179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113179

Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1726–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gao, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). How does digital leadership foster employee innovative behavior: A cognitive–affective processing system perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

Heggestad, E. D., Scheaf, D. J., Banks, G. C., Monroe Hausfeld, M., Tonidandel, S., & Williams, E. B. (2019). Scale adaptation in organizational science research: A review and best-practice recommendations. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2596–2627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319850280

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Huang, M., Zhao, R., & Chen, X. (2026). Digital leadership and employee innovation: A sequential mediation model of job crafting and innovation efficacy. SAGE Open, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251411403

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Kim, M. S., Phillips, J. M., Park, W.-W., & Gully, S. M. (2023). When leader–member exchange leads to knowledge sharing: The roles of general self-efficacy, team leader modeling, and LMX differentiation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(7), 1442–1469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1886150

Latif, M., Irfan, M., Rafiq, Z., Golra, O. A., & Abbas, S. M. (2025). Digital leadership and innovative work behaviour: Role of knowledge sharing and role clarity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2025.2566494

Lu, L., Leung, K., & Koch, P. T. (2006). Managerial knowledge sharing: The role of individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00029.x

Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457

Ng, T. W. H., & Lucianetti, L. (2016). Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social-cognitive theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

Purba, E., Ariesa, Y., Saragih, L., Damanik, D., & Sudirman, A. (2022). Meninjau sustainable competitive advantage: Peran entrepreneurial orientation, knowledge management, dan marketing innovation. AdBispreneur: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 7(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v7i1.34997

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com

Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., Costanza, D. P., & Zacher, H. (2021). Generations and generational differences: Debunking myths in organizational science and practice and paving new paths forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(6), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2

Sari, K. D. C., Jaya, Y. F. T., & Salsabela, R. N. (2024). Pengaruh digital leadership dan work engagement pada innovation work behaviour pada Gen Z Jawa Tengah. Perwira Journal of Economics & Business, 4(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.54199/pjeb.v4i2.414

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). NFER-Nelson.

Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8

Sun, U. Y., Xu, H., Kluemper, D. H., McLarty, B. D., & Yun, S. (2024). Ethical leadership and knowledge sharing: A social cognitive approach investigating the role of self-efficacy as a key mechanism. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114531

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429

Xiao, T., Makhija, M., & Karim, S. (2022). A knowledge recombination perspective of innovation: Review and new research directions. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1724–1777. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211055982

Yang, M., Talha, M., Zhang, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Exploring the mechanisms linking digital leadership to employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081024

Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142628

Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jabb.v7i2.43933

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



This publication is indexed by: