Ethical Democracy: An Analysis Of The Ethicality Of Post-Reform Election Organizers From The Perspective Of Historical Instit`Utionalism

Ibrahim Ibrahim, Iman Cahyanto

Abstract


The phenomenon of ethical violations by election organizers in post-reform Indonesia has intensified, extending to regional and city-level election organizers. From 2012 to 2024, the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP RI) recorded 5,670 complaints of ethical violations against the General Elections Commission (KPU) and the Elections Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu). This high rate of ethical violations has created a decline in modern substantive democracy. Ethical violations by election organizers post-reform are not simply individual deviations, but rather the result of structural vulnerabilities created by institutional design, power configurations, and electoral political incentives. A case study from 2025 revealed that the DKPP RI imposed a strict sanction of dismissal on a member of the Bogor City KPU after being found guilty of using his authority for transactional gain, seeking the favor of one of the Bogor mayoral candidates. This study explains that ethical violations by election organizers are the result of a structural configuration between institutional design, electoral political incentives, and oligarchic pressure. The method used is descriptive analysis, a research method that focuses on current and ongoing solutions by collecting and compiling data, which is then analyzed to find answers. This research seeks to contribute to strengthening the electoral system and democracy in Indonesia by using a historical institutional approach to interpreting ethical violations of election officials in Indonesia. Therefore, this research seeks to examine the recruitment process of election officials in Indonesia after the reform era and analyze the phenomenon of structural and recurrent ethical violations.


Keywords


Election Organizers; Ethical Violations; Reform

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balaga Nur Muhammad, & Ristina Yudhanti. (2025). Proyeksi Konstitusional Electronic Voting Dalam Pemilu Berbasis Decision Support System Dalam Perspektif Good Election. Law Research Review Quarterly, 11(3), 933–964. https://doi.org/10.15294/llrq.v11i3.26293

BAWASLU. (n.d.).

Beramendi, P., Besley, T., & Levi, M. (2024). Political equality: what is it and why does it matter? Oxford Open Economics, 3(Supplement_1), i262–i281. https://doi.org/10.1093/ooec/odad055

Birch, S., & Loeber, L. (2023). Electoral Violence , Corruption , and Political Order. 0461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2263418

Burhanudin Muhtadi. (2019). Populisme politik identitas dan Dinamika Elektoral. Intrans Publishing Wisma Kalimetro.

Daerah, P. (2017). dalam Republik.

DKPP RI. (2025). DKPP Berhentikan Tetap Tiga Penyelenggara Pemilu. https://share.google/gxCNke1yuHakJ0305

Drochon, H. (2020). Robert Michels , the iron law of oligarchy and dynamic democracy. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12494

Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, Bastian Herre, Lucas Rodés-Guirao. (2024). The world has become much more democratic over the last two centuries. Our Word Data. https://ourworldindata.org/democracy#explore-data-on-democracy

Garnett, H. A., James, T. S., & Macgregor, M. (2022). Electoral Integrity Global Report. May.

Gaspard, V. (2025). Politicians , Electoral Integrity , and Electoral Management Bodies : A Cross ‐ National Study on Satisfaction With Democracy. 13, 1–21.

Goldberg, A. C. (2024). Election integrity across Europe : who thinks elections are held fairly and why ? 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773924000055

Grishin, N., & Leenders, A. M. R. (n.d.). No Title. 2(100), 597–604.

Hukum, F., Malahayati, U., Perdana, A. P., Hukum, F., Malahayati, U., Kurnia, K. F., Hukum, F., Sang, U., & Ruwa, B. (2021). Peran partai politik dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu yang aspiratif dan demokratif. 06(01), 180–203.

IDEA), L. I. untuk D. dan P. P. (International. (2011). Memperkenalkan Pemilihan Elektronik : Lembar Kebijakan.

Jamila Michner & Mallory. (2026). Uncil Democracy, How Acces to Justice Political Power. University Press.

Kehormatan, D., Pemilu, P., & Indonesia, R. (2017). Dewan kehormatan penyelenggara pemilu republik indonesia.

Kelley, J. (n.d.). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Rethinking Election Monitoring.

Laura Clancy, Moira Fagan, R. W. (2024). Global Elections in 2024: What We Learned in a Year of Political Disruption. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2024/12/11/global-elections-in-2024-what-we-learned-in-a-year-of-political-disruption/

Malpractice, E., & Incumbents, P. (n.d.). Effect of Electoral Malpractice on the Performance of Political Incumbents on Election Promises Abubakar Salihu PhD 153-159. 152–159.

Miles dan Huberman. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif.

Ni’matul Huda, M. I. N. (2017). PENATAAN DEMOKRASI DAN PEMILU DI INDONESIA. PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri.

Norris, P., Frank, R. W., & Martínez, F. (2014). Measuring Electoral Integrity around. October, 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001061

Orfeo Fioretos, T. G. F. (2017). The Oxford Handbook Of Historical Institusionalism. Oxford University Press.

Palmer, J. M. (2024). Deterrence and Foreign Election Intervention : Securing Democracy through Punishment , Denial , and Delegitimization. 9(2).

Paul Pierson. (2004). Politics in Time : History Institusional and Social and Social Analysis. Princetion University Press.

Programme, M. W., Birch, S., & Author, A. (2016). The Electoral Tango : the Evolution of Electoral Integrity in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes.

Ramadhan, D., Kurniawan, B. M., Indonesia, D., & Pemilu, P. (2022). LIMITASI ETIKA PEMILU. 4, 15–30.

Rekker, R. (2024). Electoral change through generational replacement: An age-period-cohort analysis of vote choice across 21 countries between 1948 and 2021. Frontieris. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/political-science/articles/10.3389/fpos.2024.1279888/full

Role, T., & Organizations, R. (n.d.). The Integrity of Elections :

Sebuah, P., & Teori, A. (n.d.). Measuring the potential violation of the organizers election code of ethics: an analysis of theory of structuration. 27–46.

Siachiwena, H., & Saunders, C. (2021). Elections , Legitimacy , and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Africa Lessons from Zambia , Zimbabwe and Malawi. 67–114. https://doi.org/10.20940/JAE/2021/v20i1a

Sugiono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuntitatif, Kualitatif.

Tan, N. (2023). in Asia : Bending the Rules edited by.

Toby S James. (2019). Electoral Management and the organisational determinants of electoral integrity. International Political Science, 40. 295-31.

Umum, P., Chief, G., Redaksi, D., Board, E., & Budhiati, I. (n.d.). No Title.

Yusri, A. (2022). INDONESIAN ELECTIONS IN THE SHADOW OF MONEY POLITICS : STRENGTHENING STAKEHOLDERS ’ COMMITMENT AND CREATING ANTI-MONEY.

Zafar, C. N., & Pilkjaer, A. (2007). E-Voting in Pakistan. Systems Science, 111.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jgop.v8i1.39037

Copyright (c) 2026 Ibrahim Ibrahim, Iman Cahyanto

This publication is indexed by: