Developing Differentiated Learning Model to Enhance Creative Mathematical Thinking
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to develop a differentiated learning model based on open problem solving (DL-OPS) to enhance students’ creative mathematical thinking skills. The research adopts the Plomp development model consisting of three phases: preliminary research, prototyping, and assessment. The subjects involved were mathematics teachers and 42 eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Jonggat. Data collection instruments included expert validation questionnaires, teacher and student response questionnaires, interviews, and creative thinking tests. The results showed that the developed model and its supporting materials (guidebook, textbook, and teaching module) were valid, practical, and effective. Validation scores from experts indicated a high level of validity. Teacher and student responses indicated that the model was practical in classroom implementation. Furthermore, students' creative thinking abilities significantly improved, with post-test average scores increasing from 8.21 (fairly creative) to 14.16 (creative), and the proportion of students in the creative and very creative categories rising from 37% to 87%. The model’s core features—content, process, and product differentiation, integration of open-ended problems, and authentic assessments—create a learning environment that is flexible, reflective, and collaborative. This research contributes to innovative pedagogical practices aligned with 21st-century learning needs and supports individualized learning pathways to promote creativity in mathematics education.
Keywords
Full Text:
DOWNLOAD [PDF]References
Aguhayon, A., Santos, R., & De Vera, M. (2023). Differentiated instruction in mathematics: Impact on student performance. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1626a
Demir, S. (2021). Differentiated instruction in mathematics education. Journal of Educational Research, 15(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1870001
Kristiani, E., Rahayu, W., & Handayani, T. (2021). Differentiated learning in secondary mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1447a
Nguyen, T. H., & Le, Q. T. (2023). Open-ended tasks and mathematical creativity: Evidence from Vietnamese classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(5), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10298-4
Nohda, N. (2000). Teaching by open-ended approach in Japanese mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 32(5), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-000-0070-7
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
Rijal, S., & Azimi, H. (2021). Differentiated instruction and 21st century skills in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102439
Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2019). Open problem solving in mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7417.75-88
Supratman, M., Ardana, I. M., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Differentiated learning model based on open problem solving: A systematic review. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 28(3), 233–248
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Zhou, M., & Kim, T. (2024). Differentiated instruction and creativity development in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 115(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10345-8
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Committee:
- Dr. Syaharuddin : +62 878-6400-3847
- Dr. Intan Dwi Hastuti : +62 812-1611-9880