The Role of Supporting Pillars in Optimizing School-Based Managemen

Muhammad Ikhwan Ahmad, Andi Abd. Muis, Jumawati Jumawati, Sukriati Sukriati, Hamran Hamran, Muh. Imran Afit, Abd. Rahman Saleh

Abstract


Abstract: This study explores the role of supporting pillars in optimizing School-Based Management (SBM) as a strategy for improving the quality of education. The significance of this research lies in the need to understand the key elements that underpin the successful implementation of SBM across various educational levels. The objective of the study is to identify the contributions of each pillar autonomy, participation, transparency, and accountability in enhancing the effectiveness of school management. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach through a literature review and document analysis related to SBM practices in Indonesia. The findings indicate that schools strengthening these four pillars are able to improve academic performance, foster a participatory culture, and enhance resource management systems. In conclusion, the supporting pillars play a vital role as the foundation for sustaining an effective and adaptive SBM system. The impact of optimizing these pillars extends beyond improving the quality of educational services; it also strengthens public trust in schools as centers for nurturing students' potential.


Keywords


School-Based Management, Supporting Pillars, Education Quality, Optimization, Participation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bandur, A. (2012). School-Based Management Developments: Challenges and Impacts. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 845–873. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211264752

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Depdiknas. (2003). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Kebijakan dan Panduan Pelaksanaan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Fattah, N. (2004). Manajemen Pendidikan Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Haryanto, D. (2019). Sekolah yang otonom dalam pengambilan keputusan memiliki fleksibilitas untuk melakukan inovasi yang berorientasi pada mutu.

Ibrahim, R., & Syaodih, E. (2011). Perencanaan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mulyasa, E. (2009). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurkolis. (2003). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Teori, Model, dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Purwanto. (2013). Administrasi dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Suryana, Y. (2018). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Implementasi dan Tantangan di Era Pendidikan Global. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.

Suryana. (2018). Keterlibatan masyarakat dalam MBS memperkuat ikatan emosional dan kepedulian terhadap kualitas layanan pendidikan di sekolah.

Sudirman, S. (2020). Pendidikan Partisipatif: Membangun Kualitas Melalui MBS dan Pilar Penyangga. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sutisna. (2006). Administrasi Pendidikan Dasar Teoritis ke Praktis. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for Quality Provision in Cross-border Higher Education. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Usman, H. (2006). Manajemen: Teori, Praktik, dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Wijaya, C. (2015). Manajemen Pendidikan: Konsep, Prinsip dan Teori Praktik. Yogyakarta: Ombak.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.