Strategic Design of Integrated Learning Components for Improving Education Quality

Suherni Suherni, Andi Abd. Muis, Syamsuriah Syamsuriah, Jupri Jupri, Ismail Mulias, Abd. Rahman Saleh

Abstract


Abstract: The development of integrated learning components is a critical factor in enhancing the quality of education. This study aims to identify effective strategies in designing integrated objectives, content/materials, teaching methods, and evaluation. This research is important because misalignment between these components often leads to low effectiveness in the teaching and learning process. The method used is descriptive qualitative research with document analysis techniques and observation of teaching practices in several schools. The results show that alignment between objectives, content, methods, and evaluation leads to increased student motivation, achievement of competencies, and learning time efficiency. In conclusion, the strategy for designing integrated learning components can foster more focused, creative learning and positively impact learning outcomes. The findings can serve as a reference for educators and policymakers in designing and implementing higher-quality, sustainable learning.


Keywords


Learning Strategy, Learning Components, Education Quality, Learning Objectives, Evaluation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappa International.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2012). Strategies and Models for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills (6th ed.). Pearson.

Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2020). The Right Drivers in Action for Schools, Districts, and Systems. Corwin Press.

Glatthorn, A. A., Boschee, F., & Whitehead, B. M. (2018). Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and Implementation (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guskey, T. R. (2007). How Classroom Assessments Improve Learning. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 36-42.

Hattie, J. (2015). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2017). "The Power of Feedback in Student Learning." Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 81-106.

Johnson, D., & Brown, L. (2020). "The Impact of Digital Learning on Student Engagement in Secondary Education." Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 112-125.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Marzano, R. J. (2007). The Art and Science of Teaching: A Comprehensive Framework for Effective Instruction. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students (6th ed.). Pearson.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2017). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues (7th ed.). Pearson.

Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

Thomas, J. W. (2019). "A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning." International Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 191-209.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.