PELATIHAN PENGGUNAAN KECERDASAN BUATAN UNTUK PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PENULISAN ILMIAH PADA MAHASISWA S2 UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MAKASSAR
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Munculnya teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) merupakan perhatian khusus bagi pengajaran dan pendidikan yang fokus pada penulisan ilmiah. Banyak mahasiswa yang gagal memahami konsep teknik aplikasi AI untuk menyusun tulisan mereka. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk melatih mahasiswa mengenai penerapan AI yang tepat dan etis dalam penulisan ilmiah. Tahapan kegiatan dimulai dari koordinasi awal antara tim pelaksana dan mitra institusi untuk menyusun rencana kerja, dilanjutkan dengan pemetaan kebutuhan peserta melalui survei, pengembangan materi pelatihan yang sesuai dengan latar belakang peserta, serta sosialisasi kegiatan. Pelaksanaan kegiatan dilakukan melalui workshop interaktif selama dua hari yang mencakup sesi kuliah, praktik langsung, diskusi etika AI, dan klinik penulisan. Setelah pelaksanaan, dilakukan evaluasi melalui kuesioner kepuasan dan pengumpulan tugas akhir peserta. Monitoring dilanjutkan dengan pendampingan penulisan serta evaluasi hasil tulisan yang telah disempurnakan menggunakan AI. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa 70,6% peserta merasa sangat puas dan 29,4% lainnya merasa puas dengan pelatihan. Sebanyak 94,1% peserta berencana akan mengimplementasikan AI dalam penulisan ilmiah mereka. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan ini berhasil tidak hanya dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mahasiswa, tetapi juga dalam membentuk perspektif etis terkait plagiarisme. Oleh karena itu, pelatihan ini telah efektif, dengan dampak positif yang diharapkan dapat diterapkan dalam berbagai inisiatif pendidikan di masa mendatang.
Kata kunci: Kecerdasan Buatan; Penulisan Ilmiah; Pelatihan Mahasiswa; Etika Akademik; Peningkatan Kualitas.
ABSTRACT
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become a major concern in education, especially in academic writing. Many students struggle to understand the concepts and techniques of applying AI in their writing. Therefore, this program aimed to train students on the proper and ethical use of AI in scientific writing. The activity began with coordination between the implementing team and institutional partners to develop a work plan, followed by a needs assessment survey, development of training materials tailored to participants’ academic backgrounds, and dissemination of the program. The implementation stage included a two-day interactive workshop involving lectures, hands-on practice, discussions on AI ethics, and a writing clinic. After the training, evaluation was carried out through participant satisfaction questionnaires and submission of revised academic writing tasks. Monitoring continued with mentoring and assessment of final papers enhanced using AI. The results showed that 70.6% of participants were very satisfied, and 29.4% were satisfied with the training. Additionally, 94.1% of participants expressed their intention to implement AI in their future academic writing. These results indicate that the training was successful not only in improving students’ writing skills but also in shaping their ethical perspectives on plagiarism. Thus, the training proved to be effective, with positive impacts expected to be applied in future educational initiatives.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Scientific Writing; Student Training; Academic Ethics; Quality Improvement.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Babl, F. E., & Babl, M. P. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence: Can ChatGPT Write a Quality Abstract? Emergency Medicine Australasia, 35(5), 809–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14233
BaHammam, A. S. (2023). Balancing Innovation and Integrity: The Role of AI in Research and Scientific Writing. Nature and Science of Sleep, Volume 15, 1153–1156. https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.s455765
Chen, J. J., & Lin, J. C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence as a Double-Edged Sword: Wielding the POWER Principles to Maximize Its Positive Effects and Minimize Its Negative Effects. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25(1), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/14639491231169813
Cheng, H., Sheng, B., Lee, A., Chaudary, V., Atanasov, A. G., Liu, N., Qiu, Y., Wong, T. Y., Tham, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2024). Have AI-Generated Texts From LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.586710
Granjeiro, J. M. (2025). The Future of Scientific Writing: AI Tools, Benefits, and Ethical Implications. Brazilian Dental Journal, 36. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256471
Inastrilla, C. R. A., Santana, M. L., Vera, D. G., Madrigal, M. del C. R., Urrutia, A. R., & Inastrilla, A. A. (2024). Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence in the Editorial Management of Scientific Journals. Eai Endorsed Transactions on Ai and Robotics, 3. https://doi.org/10.4108/airo.5643
Kouam, A. W. F. (2024). AI in Academic Writing: Ally or Foe? International Journal of Research Publications, 148(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001481520246427
Masukume, G. (2024). The Impact of AI on Scientific Literature: A Surge in AI-Associated Words in Academic and Biomedical Writing. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.31.24308296
McGuire, A. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Rethinking Plagiarism, Digital Literacy, and the Ethics of Co-Authorship in Higher Education. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.131
Miao, J., Thongprayoon, C., Suppadungsuk, S., Valencia, O. A. G., Qureshi, F., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. Clinics and Practice, 14(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008
PAN, J. (2024). AI-driven English Language Learning Program and Academic Writing Integrity in the Era of Intelligent Interface. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 6(4), p120. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v6n4p120
Parviz, M. (2025). Generative AI in the English Composition Classroom Practical and Adaptable Strategies. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.371422
Peter, E., Rosmayanti, V., & Yahrif, M. (2023). Exploring students’ learning strategies in reading comprehension class. Jurnal Scientia, 12(01), 46–54.
Rantisari, A. M. D., Sulfiani, S., Rosmayanti, V., & Saleh, A. (2023). Pemanfaatan teh kombucha untuk kesehatan dan kecantikan kulit pada masyarakat di Kabupaten Maros. Indonesia Berdaya, 4(4), 1277–1286.
Rosmayanti, V. (2021). Exploring Pre- Service Teachers ’ View on the Implementation of Virtual Internship Program during. The Fist ELESPIC Proceedings, 65–74.
Rosmayanti, V., & Sabillah, B. M. (2017). The Application of eclectic method in teaching young learners in X1 English course in Makassar. International Conference on Education, Science, Art and Technology, 223–231.
Schmidt, P. G., & Meir, A. J. (2024). Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 71(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti2838
Shopovski, J. (2024). ≪strong>Generative Artificial Intelligence, AI for Scientific Writing: A Literature Review</Strong> https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.0011.v1
Švab, I., Klemenc–Ketiš, Z., & Zupanič, S. (2023). New Challenges in Scientific Publications: Referencing, Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jce.v4i1.31425
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.