Smartphones in the Classroom: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Pre-Service Teachers’ Academic Use, Perceived Benefits, and Challenges

Dedi Irwan

Abstract


Smartphones are the most widely available digital device in Indonesian teacher education, yet evidence on how pre-service teachers actually use them during formal instruction, and with what consequences, remains limited. This study examined the frequency of academic smartphone use during lectures, the learning benefits pre-service teachers perceive from such use, disciplinary variation in use patterns, and the challenges and support needs that accompany it. A descriptive–associative, cross-sectional survey was administered to 260 pre-service teachers enrolled in eight teacher education programmes at Universitas PGRI Pontianak, Indonesia. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests of independence, with Cramér’s V reported as a measure of effect size. Smartphone use during lectures was highly prevalent: 79.1% of respondents reported frequent to very frequent academic use, mainly to access learning materials and complete assignments. Use frequency was significantly associated with perceived learning benefit, χ²(16) = 45.38, p < .001, V = .21, whereas the association between disciplinary cluster and use frequency was weaker and lay at the conventional threshold, χ²(12) = 21.02, p = .050, V = .16. Limited internet data (55%) and distraction from non-academic applications (42%) were the most frequently reported constraints, and respondents were almost evenly divided over whether they needed institutional guidance. The findings position smartphones as a learning infrastructure that simultaneously affords access and imposes attentional costs, and they support guided, discipline-sensitive and infrastructure-aware integration in teacher preparation rather than blanket permission or prohibition.


Keywords


Smartphone; Pre-service Teachers; Mobile Learning; Survey Research.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, A. A. (2023). The impact of smartphone use on the learning process [in Indonesian]. Education: Scientific Journal of Education, 1(2). https://journal.csspublishing.com/index.php/education/article/view/111

Bülbül, A. E., & Özelçi, S. Y. (2025). The mediating role of mobile learning motivation in the relationship between pre-service teachers’ digital literacy and pre-service teacher identity. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12868-9

Chindia, B., & Wawire, S. N. (2024). Student attitudes towards smartphone use in a pre-service teacher tech course. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.011

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007

de Vaus, D. (2014). Surveys in social research (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519196

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.

Falade, A. A., Aladesusi, G. A., & Ogunlade, O. O. (2021). Perceptions on the utilization of mobile technologies for learning among postgraduate students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.9036

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.

Galway, G. J., Maddigan, B., & Stordy, M. (2020). Teacher educator experiences of iPad integration in pre-service teacher education: Successes and challenges. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(5), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1819397

Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Hennessy, S., D’Angelo, S., McIntyre, N., Koomar, S., Kreimeia, A., Cao, L., Brugha, M., & Zubairi, A. (2022). Technology use for teacher professional development in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100080

İslamoğlu, H., Kabakçı Yurdakul, I., & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ acceptance of mobile-technology-supported learning activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09973-8

Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg031

Masadeh, T. S. Y. (2021). Smartphone use in learning as perceived by university undergraduates: Benefits and barriers. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i3.2021.3764

Murni, D., Jamna, J., Solfema, S., & Handican, R. (2023). The use of smartphones in mathematics learning: What are students’ perceptions? [in Indonesian]. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2153

Nisa, K., Ramadhan, S., & Thahar, H. E. (2023). Assessing undergraduate students’ perspectives on lecturers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge competency. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i1.8364

Nurhalifah, Rizaldi, D. R., Muktopan, & Nilwan. (2024). The positive and negative effects of smartphone use on students’ learning achievement [in Indonesian]. Action Research Journal, 1(1), 10–17. https://ejournal.lembagaeinsteincollege.com/ARJ/article/view/22

Palalas, A., & Wark, N. (2020). The relationship between mobile learning and self-regulated learning: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5650

Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Personalized adaptive learning: An emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410

Skowronek, J., Seifert, A., & Lindberg, S. (2023). The mere presence of a smartphone reduces basal attentional performance. Scientific Reports, 13, 9363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36256-4

Sophonhiranrak, S. (2021). Features, barriers, and influencing factors of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 7(4), e06696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06696

Tong, D. H., Nguyen, T. T., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2023). Using m-learning in teacher education: A systematic review of demographic details, research methodologies, pre-service teacher outcomes, and advantages and challenges. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep482. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13818

Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462

We Are Social. (2021). Digital 2021: Global overview report. DataReportal. https://www.datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-report




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v9i3.37399

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


JUSTEK : Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi sudah terindeks

EDITORIAL OFFICE: