STRENGTHENING STUDENT RESEARCH LITERACY: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY TRAINING AT MAN INSAN CENDEKIA EAST LOMBOK
Abstract
Abstrak: Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan literasi riset siswa MAN Insan Cendekia (IC) Lombok Timur melalui pelatihan metodologi penelitian. Rendahnya pemahaman siswa terhadap metodologi penelitian ilmiah menjadi latar belakang pentingnya kegiatan ini, terutama dalam mendukung program Kelompok Ilmiah Remaja (KIR) dan mempersiapkan siswa menghadapi kompetisi riset seperti Madrasah Young Researchers (MYRES). Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan ceramah interaktif, diskusi, dan pendampingan dengan evaluasi berbasis pretest-posttest menggunakan instrumen tes kognitif yang mengacu pada Taksonomi Bloom (C1-C4). Kegiatan dilaksanakan pada tanggal 11 Oktober 2025 dengan melibatkan sekitar 110 siswa sebagai peserta. Hasil evaluasi posttest dari 72 responden menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata skor literasi metodologi penelitian siswa mencapai 64,11 dengan standar deviasi 24,33. Kategorisasi menunjukkan 22% siswa berada pada kategori Sangat Baik (≥85), 21% kategori Baik (75-84), 6% kategori Cukup (65-74), 18% kategori Kurang (55-64), dan 33% kategori Sangat Kurang (<55). Kegiatan ini memberikan kontribusi positif dalam penguatan literasi riset siswa madrasah dan direkomendasikan untuk dilanjutkan dengan program pendampingan berkelanjutan.
Abstract: This community service activity aimed to enhance the research literacy of students at MAN Insan Cendekia (IC) East Lombok through research methodology training. The inadequate understanding of scientific research methodology among students served as the rationale for this initiative, particularly in supporting the Youth Scientific Group (Kelompok Ilmiah Remaja/KIR) program and preparing students for research competitions such as Madrasah Young Researchers (MYRES). The implementation method employed an interactive lecture approach, discussion, and mentoring with pretest-posttest evaluation using cognitive test instruments based on Bloom's Taxonomy (C1-C4). The activity was conducted on October 11, 2025, involving approximately 110 students as participants. The posttest evaluation results from 72 respondents indicated that the mean score for research methodology literacy reached 64.11 with a standard deviation of 24.33. The categorization revealed that 22% of students fell within the Excellent category (≥85), 21% in the Good category (75-84), 6% in the Fair category (65-74), 18% in the Poor category (55-64), and 33% in the Very Poor category (<55). This activity contributed positively to strengthening the research literacy of madrasah students and is recommended for continuation through sustainable mentoring programs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W.., & Krathwohl, D. R.. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bruce, C., Demasson, A., Hughes, H., Lupton, M., Sayyad Abdi, E., Maybee, C., Somerville, M., & Mirjamdotter, A. (2017). Information literacy and informed learning: Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2184
Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
Drewery, M. L., & Lollar, J. (2024). Undergraduates’ perceptions of the value of service-learning. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1330456
Gerges, E. (2025). Science education in the age of misinformation. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1615769
Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Transforming Education in Indonesia: The Impact and Challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026–5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31
Iqbal, M., Jayadi, A., Nuraeni, Jaswandi, L., Mujiburrahman, & Anam, K. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Konsep dan Implementasi (I. Hadi, Ed.; 1st ed.). Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399072324_Metodologi_Penelitian_Pendidikan_Konsep_dan_Implementasi
Iqbal, M., Suhardi, M., & Muslim, A. (2021). Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Evaluasi Program Pendidikan (M. Hidayat & Y. Setiawan, Eds.). Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia.
Karim, A. R. (2023). Analisis Pentingnya Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah pada Siswa SMA. NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v4i4.1802
Kivunja, C. (2018). Distinguishing between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework: A Systematic Review of Lessons from the Field. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 44. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p44
Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024, July). 7,961 madrasah student research proposals registered for MYRES 2024. Https://Kemenag.Go.Id/Nasional/7-961-Proposal-Riset-Siswa-Madrasah-Didaftarkan-Ikut-Myres-2024-8vZMg.
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing Survey Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315172231
Paul, Richard., & Elder, Linda. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Piaget, Jean., Inhelder, B., Kagan, Jerome., & Weaver, Helen. (2000). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Ramayanti, R., & Iranda, A. (2023). Pengembangan Literasi Informasi Berbasis Modul untuk Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Negeri. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 7(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v7i1.6752
Salmitha, L., Ulfah, Z., & Raihan, R. (2024). Pelatihan Metodologi Riset Sebagai Upaya Implementasi Program Madrasah Riset Bagi Guru Madrasah di Kabupaten Paser. Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 9(2), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.36312/linov.v9i2.1863
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Willingham, D. T. (2008). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Education Policy Review, 109(4), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.109.4.21-32
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jces.v9i1.36989
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
=======================
JCES (Journal of Character Education Society)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
Contact Admin:
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp: +62 852-3764-1341
=======================
=======================

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JCES (Journal of Character Education Society) already indexed:
EDITORIAL OFFICE:





