A Comparative Study Between Javanese and Madurese Reduplication

Maryani Maryani

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to find out the similarities and differences both in the form and the function of the reduplication between Javanese and Madurese. This research used descriptive qualitative method. The data were taken from Javanese and Madurese words. Madurese words will be collected randomly from some respondents who came from Madura, especially taken from daily conversation in the domain of the family.  And discourse in Madurese folktale. Whereas, Javanese words will be taken randomly from Djaka Lodang magazine edition of Desember 2020, November 2021, Januari 2022 and some informants who come from Java especially in Bantul-Yogyakarta. The result showed that there were some similarities between Javanese and Madurese reduplication in the forms, such as: full reduplication, partial reduplication, reduplication combined with affixation, reduplication with sound modification and the word resembles of reduplication. While in the function have two types, i.e. inflective reduplication and derivative reduplication. Meanwhile, for the differences of reduplication, Javanese does not have the forms of final syllable reduplication, whereas Madurese does have and it is very dominant in daily conversation both in the formal or informal situation. The functions of reduplication, Javenese has class word Noun to be Adjective, whereas Madurese does not have.

Keywords


Comparative study, Reduplication, Javenese, Madurese

Full Text:

PDF

References


Marriam Bashir; Muhammad Azeem; Ashiq Hussain Dogar, “Factor Effecting Students ’ English Speaking Skills,” Br. J. Arts Soc. Sci., vol. 2, no. January 2011, pp. 35–50, 2016.

M. D. Habra, M. Ma, D. Samio, M. Pd, A. Nata, and M. Kom, “P e n e r b i t :,” Maj. Ilm. Kultra, vol. 16, no. 1 Juni, pp. 5100–5109, 2015.

S. A. Khashimova, “On the Concept of Reduplication in Linguistics,” Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 05, no. 05, pp. 1659–1664, 2022.

M. D. Kristanti L, I., “REDUPLICATION PATTERNS IN THE UTTERANCE OF MANDURO SOCIETY Ika Lusi Kristanti 1 Diana Mayasari 2 STKIP PGRI Jombang,” JEEL (Journal English Educ. Lit., vol. 05, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2018.

F. Mustafa, “Evidence of (in)applicability of Morphological Doubling Theory in Acehnese reduplication,” EduLite J. English Educ. Lit. Cult., vol. 7, no. 2, p. 342, 2022.

R. F. Sulistiyani A., Fauza N.A., Rahayu, “Reduplication in Sundanese language : Pupuh Maskumambang,” Proc. Int. Conf., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 187–193, 2021.

D. M. Ratu and M. G. Maru, “Reduplication of Mongondow Language,” Celt A J. Cult. English Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 209, 2017.

D. K. Rachmawati, “Reduplikasi Bahasa Madura Dialek Sumenep dalam Teori Morfologi Distribusional.” p. 217, 2015.

A. C. Alwasilah, Pokoknya Kualitatif. 2009.

A. W. Habibi, “The Comparative Study of Redplication Between English and Indonesian Language,” Edulitics J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021.

J. W. Cresswell, Research design pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan mixed (terjemahan Achmad Fawaid). 2010.

I. D. P. Wijana, “Reduplication in Javanese,” Linguist. Indones., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i2.12532

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Linguistics and English Language Teaching Journal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_____________________________________________________

Linguistics and ELT Journal

p-ISSN 2339-2940 | e-ISSN 2614-8633

Creative Commons License
LELTJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_____________________________________________________

LELTJ is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:

             

_____________________________________________________

LELTJ Editorial Office: