A Conversational Analysis of Grice’s Maxims Theories on Cooperative Principles at Undergraduate English Students
Abstract
This study was aimed to analyze students’ conversation based on Grice’s maxim theory at the English department of Muhammadiyah University of Mataram. The method of this research was qualitative. The result of this research showed that students were followed the maxim of quantity is 60 utterances, followed the maxim of quality is 16 utterances, followed the maxim of relevant is 24 utterances, and followed the maxim of manner is 6 utterances. Violated maxim of quantity is 47 utterances, violated maxim of quality is 27 utterances, violated maxim of relevant is 50 utterances and violated manner is 89 utterances. Violated maxims often happen than followed the maxims, total of violated whole the maxims are 213 and total of followed whole the maxims are 106 because the speaker and participants are come from different cultures, using informal language and their purpose in communication to maintain their social harmony.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akmajian, A. Demers, Richard, A. Farmer Ann, K. & Harnis, Robert, M. (2001). An Introduction to Language and Communication. Fifth Edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England: The MTT Press.
Brown, G & Yule, G (1983).Discourse analysis. Cambridge university press.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse a resource book for students. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. London and New York
Coutlas, A. (2003). Language and social contexts. First Edition. Routledge. Taylor and Francis group. London and New York.
Griffiths, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics: Edinburgh university press.
Grice, H, P. (1991). Logic and Conversation. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
Iskandar, D. (2010). Unpublished Thesis. The Gricean Maxim Analysis in the Script of the Simpson Season 5.. Jakarta :UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Lycan, W, G. (2008). Philosophy of Language a Contemporary Introduction. Third edition. Routledge, Taylor and Francis group. New York and London.
McCharty, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Language Teaching library: Cambridge University Press
Miles, M, B. and Huberman, A, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. Sage Publication. International Educational and Professional Publisher. Thousand Oaks ,London New Delhi.
Nasution, A, D. (2014). The Flouting Of Maxims in Sarah Sechan Talk Show E p i s o d e “ F i t r i Topica” On Net TV. Unpublished Thesis. Universitas Brawijaya.
Richards, J. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics, London: Longman Group Limited.
Sugiyono. (2012) Metode penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung Penerbit Alfabeta.
Puig, B, M. (2003). Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Yule , G. (1996). Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, G. (2006). The Study of Language. Third Edition. Cambridge university press. New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v11i1.742
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Linguistics and English Language Teaching Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
Linguistics and ELT Journal
p-ISSN 2339-2940 | e-ISSN 2614-8633
LELTJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ Editorial Office: