SPEECH ACTS ANALYSIS IN COLLEGE DISCOURSE AT THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017
Abstract
In expressing something, speakers showed an action. This action could make the listeners easier to know what the speakers intended to. This is called speech act. The purpose of this research was to analyze the types of speech act used in college discourse at the English departement of Muhammadiyah University of Mataram. The researcher used those speeches as the data. The researcher took 14 students of English departement at Muhammadiyah University of Mataram as the participants. Observation was used as the data collection procedure. The result of research revealed that the aspects of speech act used at the college discourse analyzed by the researcher were: locutionary act, illocutionary act, and perlocutionary act. From those three aspects analyzed by the researcher, illocutionary act was the most often used in college discourse at the English departement of Muhammadiyah University of Mataram.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anwar, Saiful. 2012. A pragmatic Analysis on Directive Utterances Used in Donald Duck Comics Manuscript. Unpublished Research Paper. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Prakti. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. 10
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bahtiar, Rindang. 2006. A Pragmatics Analysis on the Directive Utterances in the English Translation of Tradition of Bukhari. Unpublished Research Paper. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
Cutting, Joan. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.
Dwi Purnomo, Maslathief. 2012. Diklat of Semantics in Linguistics. Medan. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Frank, Marcella. 1972. Modern English: A Practical Refrence Guide. London: Griffths.
Hamdan, HestiSuharti. 2005. A Pragmatics Analysis on Directivrs Utteranced Used in John Grisham’s the Runaway Jury. Unpublished researcher paper. Surakarta:
muhammadiyah university of surakarta.
Krisnawati, Ekaning. 2011. “Pragmatic Competence In The Spoken English Classroom.” InConaplin Journal, vol. I/No.1, pp. 104-111. Retrieved from journal.upi.edu/conaplin/view/625/pragmatic-competence-in-thespoken-english- classroom.html.
Kreidler, W. Charles. 2002. Introducing Semantic English. London: the taylor and francis e- library. Pretince-hall. York: cambridge university press.
Marianne Celce-Murcia. 2000. Discourse and Context in Language Teaching: A Guide for Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. 1979. Expressing and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: alfabeta
Sutopo, H.B.2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapannya Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i2.789
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Linguistics and English Language Teaching Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
Linguistics and ELT Journal
p-ISSN 2339-2940 | e-ISSN 2614-8633
LELTJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ Editorial Office: