Error Analysis of Sentences in English in Writing Poster By The 6th Semester Students of Elt in University of Muhammadiyah Mataram

Teti Suhaira, Rima Rahmaniah, Hidayati Hidayati

Abstract


Abstract: The objectives of this study are to analyse the types of sentences error in writing poster by the sixth semester students of English Education Department of Muhammadiyah University of Mataram in Academic Year 2020/2021 and to find out the most dominant error made by the students. This study applied qualitative method and used document in the form of posters as the instrument. The researcher collected 25 posters made by the students. This study classified types of sentences error in the posters based on Surface Strategy Taxonomy proposed by Dulay, Burt, and Krashen (1982). The researcher found that there were errors of omission 37% that categorized as low category, addition 32% that categorized as low category, misformation 29% that categorized as low category, misordering 2% that categorized as very low category. Based on these results, the most dominant error made by the students was omission with percentage 37%.

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis jenis-jenis dari kesalahan kalimat dalam penulisan poster oleh mahasiswa semester enam Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris dari universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram pada tahun ajaran 2020/2021 serta untuk menemukan kesalahan yang paling dominan yang dilakukan oleh mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode kualitatif dan menggunakan dokumen berupa poster sebagai alat penelitian. Penelitian ini menggolongkan jenis-jenis kesalahan kalimat didalam poster berdasarkan Surface Strategy Taxonomy yang dikemukakan oleh Dulay, Burt, dan Krashen (1982). Peneliti menemukan bahwa terdapat kesalahan omission 37% yang dikategorikan sebagai kategori rendah, addition 32% yang dikategorikan sebagai kategori rendah, misformation 29% yang dikategorikan sebagai kategori rendah, dan misordering yang dikategorika nsebagai kategori rendah. Berdasarkan hasil ini, kesalahan paling dominan yang dilakukan mahasiswa adalah omission dengan persentase 37%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.

Dulay, H. (1982). Language two. ERIC.

Eggenschwiler, J., Biggs, E. D., & Reinhardt, C. L. W. (2011). CliffsNotes Writing. John Wiley & Sons.

Gass, S. M., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.

Keshavarz, M. H. (2012). Contrastive analysis and error analysis. Rahnama Publications.

Khansa, A. S., & Sutrisno, A. (2019). Grammatical Errors in Indonesian University Students’ Posters in Yogyakarta. Lexicon, 6(2).

Sudijono, A. (2010). Pengantar statistik pendidikan.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Penerbit CV. Alfabeta.

Tschirner, E. (2016). Listening and reading proficiency levels of college students. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 201–223.

Winter, E. O. (2020). Towards a contextual grammar of English: The clause and its place in the definition of sentence. Routledge.

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195–209.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Prosiding Seminar Nasional Paedagoria telah terindek: