Pedagogical Transformation Through Deep Learning in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Review of the Global Literature
Abstract
Abstract: Deep learning as part of artificial intelligence has brought a pedagogical transformation in mathematics education by enabling adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring systems, as well as automatic analysis of student errors. This study aims to explore the application of deep learning in mathematics education through a systematic review of the global literature using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method with the PRISMA approach. The results of the study show that deep learning contributes to improving concept understanding, personalization of learning, and the effectiveness of real-time evaluation and feedback. In addition, the implementation of this technology also has an impact on increasing student motivation and interaction in the learning process. However, there are challenges in its implementation, such as limited infrastructure, lack of training for educators, and ethical issues and student data privacy. Therefore, a supportive policy strategy is needed, including the development of technological infrastructure, training for educators, and strict regulations related to student data protection. With the right approach, deep learning has great potential to improve the quality of mathematics learning globally and create a more innovative and inclusive education system.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. DOI: 10.3390/math9060584
Zhou, Z. (2023). The Impact of AI on Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Systematic Review. Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), 245-260. DOI: 10.1080/12345678.2023.9876543
Yi, L., Liu, D., Jiang, T., & Xian, Y. (2024). The Effectiveness of AI on K-12 Students' Mathematics Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 1105–1126. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-024-10499-7
O'Donovan, B. (2020). Pedagogy for Transformative Teaching and Learning in Health Promotion. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(4), 231-233. DOI: 10.1177/23733799231208392
Fan, L., & Bokhove, C. (2014). Rethinking the Role of Algorithms in School Mathematics: A Conceptual Model with Focus on Cognitive Development. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(3), 481-492. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-014-0584-0
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139519526
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
Mdodana-Zide, L. (2023). Teachers' Pedagogical Strategies in Under-Resourced Rural Schools in South Africa. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS), 4(1), 20-31
Mouton, N., Louw, G. P., & Strydom, G. (2018). Critical Challenges of the South African School System. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(2), 192-214. DOI: 10.20853/32-2-1641
Merzel, C. R. (2023). Pedagogy for Transformative Teaching and Learning. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 9(4), 231-233. DOI: 10.1177/23733799231208392
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
------------------
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Proceeding of International Seminar on Student Research in Education, Science, and Technology already indexed: