Elementary School Curriculum Structure in Southeast Asia: A Comparison of the Indonesian and Philippine Education Systems
Abstract
Education in Southeast Asian countries continues to evolve in line with the demands of globalization and the need for competitive human resources. Indonesia and the Philippines are two countries that place significant emphasis on developing basic education as a foundation for developing 21st-century competencies. Indonesia is currently implementing the Independent Curriculum, which emphasizes learning flexibility, differentiated learning, and strengthening student character through the Pancasila Student Profile. Meanwhile, the Philippines implements the K-12 curriculum designed to align the national education system with international standards and prepare graduates for continuing their education and entering the workforce. This study aims to analyze and compare the structure of elementary school curricula in Indonesia and the Philippines, including educational objectives, subject structure, learning load, and competency orientation. The method used is a comparative study with a qualitative approach through an analysis of curriculum policy documents in both countries. The results of the study indicate that although both curricula share the same goal of improving the quality of basic education, there are significant differences in the emphasis on curriculum flexibility, learning approaches, and orientation to learning outcomes. These findings are expected to serve as reflection and reference material in the development of elementary education curriculum policies in the Southeast Asian region.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alimuddin, J. (2023). Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Elementary Schools. KONTEXTUAL Scientific Journal, 4(02), 67–75.
Anggara, A., et al. (2023). Implementation of the independent learning curriculum in junior high school education units. Journal of Education and Counseling, 5(1), 1899–1890
Aulia, N., & Keguruan, F. (2023). Analysis of the Independent Curriculum and the 2013 Curriculum. In Indonesian Literacy and Learning Journal (Vol. 3, Issue 1).
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Case, S., Sman, P., Banjar Regency, P., Fauzi, A., Teacher Training, F., Education, DI, Achmad, U., & Banjarmasin, Y. (2022). Implementation of the Independent Curriculum in Driving Schools. In Jurnal Pahlawan | (Vol. 18, Issue 2). October 2021. https://ojs.uvayabjm.ac.id/index.php/pahlawan/
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2020). Making sense: Reference, agency, and structure in a grammar of meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cruz, J.P., & Bernardo, A.B.I. (2019). Curriculum reform and spiral progression in Philippine basic education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09606-3
Cruz, J.P., & Bernardo, A.B.I. (2019). Curriculum reform and spiral progression in Philippine basic education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09606-3
Dávila Rubio, A.M. (2017). Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005) Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 140.https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490
Delos Santos, AR (2021). Mother tongue-based multilingual education and early literacy development in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102330
Department of Education Philippines. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide: Filipino (Grades 1–6). Department of Education.
Department of Education Philippines. (2020). K to 12 basic education curriculum framework. Department of Education.
Djamaluddin, A. (2014). Philosophy of Education. Istiqra: Journal of Islamic Education and Thought, 1(2).
DO_s2019_021.pdf (p. 11). (2023).
Education, D. of. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide. July, 4–247. http://www.deped.gov.ph/sites/default/files/page/2017/English CG!.pdf
Faiz, A., Parhan, M., & Ananda, R. (2022). New Paradigms in Prototype Curriculum. Edukatif: Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1544–1550.
Faiz, A., Pratama, A., & Kurniawaty, I. (2022). Differentiated Learning in the Leading Teacher Program in Module 2.1. Basicedu Journal, 6(2), 2846–2853.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2504
Gonzales, R.D. (2020). Discipline-based curriculum design and conceptual depth in elementary science education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(3), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1716394
K to 12 Gabay Pangkurikulum FILIPINO. (2016).
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2022). Independent Curriculum: Basic framework and structure of the elementary school curriculum. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.
Independent Learning Curriculum Yunita, I., Zainuri, A., Zulfi, A., Bina Husada Palembang Health Sciences College, S., & Selatan, S. (2023). Number (1), March 2023. In Jambura Journal of Educational Management (Issue 4).https://ejournal-fip-ung.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jjem/index
Lestari, D., Asbari, M., & Yani, EE (2023). Independent Curriculum: The Essence of Curriculum in Education. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT, 02(05).https://lipi.go.id/id/
Marsela Yulianti, Divana Leli Anggraini, Siti Nurfaizah, & Anjani Putri Belawati Pandiangan. (2022). The Role of Teachers in Developing the Independent Curriculum. Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 1(3), 290–298.https://doi.org/10.58540/jipsi.v1i3.53
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mulyasa, E. (2022). Implementation of the Independent Curriculum: Learning Innovation. Rosdakarya Youth.
Panganiban, TDC (2019). Quality assessment of physical education programs of state universities in the Philippines. SPORTIF Journal: Journal of Learning Research, 5(2), 166.https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v5i2.12983
Rowsell, J., & Morrell, E. (2020). Literacy as a social practice: Expanding the scope of literacy education. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(4), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1025
Seputar, J., Utami, RE, Mufidha, TA, Dwi, N., April, R., Meilani, N., & Lukitoaji, BD (nd). January 2025 | Page (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Sugiyono. (2015). Quantitative, qualitative and R&D research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tan, E.D., & Reyes, J.A. (2022). Outcomes-based education in Philippine basic education: Policy, practice, and challenges. International Journal of Educational Reform, 31(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221077539
Tyler, R. (1949) Basic Principles for Curriculum and Instruction, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ummi Salamah, Yuni Listiyani, & Mustafiyanti Mustafiyanti. (2024). Analysis of the Concept and Structure of the Independent and Independent Learning Curriculum. Khatulistiwa: Journal of Education and Social Humanities, 4(2), 123–129.https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v4i2.3234
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v17i3.38556
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Vivi Rulviana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan
Fakultas Keguruan & Ilmu Pendidikan | Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram.
_______________________________________________
![]() | Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan |
______________________________________________
CURRENT INDEXING:
EDITORIAL OFFICE:











