LITERACY SKILLS OF VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN WONOGIRI REGENCY

Heri Setyoko, Sarwanto Sarwanto, Mohammad Maskuri

Abstract


The objective of the study is to investigate the literacy skills in the automotive engineering program at vocational high schools (SMK) and to compare literacy skills between public and private vocational high schools in Wonogiri. The study employs a quantitative approach. The findings indicate that the literacy skills of students in the automotive engineering program at public vocational high schools consist of 80% in the good category and 20% in the fair category, while in private vocational high schools, there are 25% in the good category, 55% in the fair category, and 20% in the poor category. The significance values from the normality test for literacy skills in public vocational high schools are 0.617, and for private vocational high schools are 0.842, indicating that both groups have a normal distribution of data. The homogeneity test shows a significance value for literacy skills of 0.484, indicating that the data have the same or homogeneous variance. The Independent Sample T Test shows a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.005, indicating a significant difference between the literacy skills of public and private vocational high schools. Therefore, the conclusion of this study is that the literacy skills of students in the automotive engineering program at public vocational high schools have an average of 81.33 in the good category, while in private vocational high schools, the average is 54.59 in the fair category. The difference in literacy skills between students in public and private vocational high schools is significant.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Framework Asesmen Kemampuan Minimum. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Dahlan, M. S. (2014). Besar Sampel dalam Penelitian Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Jakarta: Epidemiologi Indonesia.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di SMA Tahun 2020. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Faizah, dkk. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Ghozali, Imam. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 26 Edisi 10. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Kasmadi dan Sunariah. (2013). Panduan Modern Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran Nomor 56/M/2022. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Rapor Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi. (2021). Konsentrasi Keahlian SMK/MAK pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Lamada, Mustari, dkk. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Siswa Smk Negeri Di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Vol.6 No.1.

OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 Assesment Framework-Mathematics, Reading, Science, and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: PISA-OECD Publishing.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2003). Undang – Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Kemendiknas.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan/Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan Nomor 34 Tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Priyatno, Duwi. (2018). SPSS Panduan Mudah Olah Data Bagi Mahasiswa dan Umum. Yogjakarta: IKAPI.

Rahmadanita, Annisa. (2022). Rendahnya Literasi Remaja di Indonesia: Masalah dan Solusi. Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah. Vol. 8, No. 2, 54-61.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R & D. Bandung: IKAPI.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.