Collaborative Model in Teaching Linguistics (A Grounded Theory Study at Universitas Borneo Tarakan)

Syarifa Rafiqa; Nofvia De Vega

doi:10.31764/leltj.v12i2.28379

Collaborative Model in Teaching Linguistics (A Grounded Theory Study at Universitas Borneo Tarakan)

Syarifa Rafiqa, Nofvia De Vega

Abstract

This study looks into collaborative techniques in linguistics education, focusing on fundamental concepts, principles, components, and the roles of many stakeholders in the educational process. The study demonstrates how collaborative models can improve linguistics education by ensuring active involvement and social interaction between students and teachers. This study employs a grounded theory methodology, which includes qualitative data gathering and analytical techniques, such as open, axial, and selective coding, to discover main themes and patterns. The interviews and discussions with professors and students from the English and Indonesian language departments are included in the research design, allowing for a thorough examination of their experiences and perspectives. Micro-linguistic theory, communicative skills, and collaborative techniques are essential to good linguistics teaching. Key findings suggest that when approaches are employed, and there is more activity, linguistic competency increases, and general educational outcomes improve. The findings spark curiosity about the role of instructor mediation, classroom management, and multimedia resources in improving collaboration. This study's outcomes suggest potential routes for future research on collaborative strategies in linguistics education, particularly with the use of technology and multimedia learning systems. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term effects of these strategies on student accomplishment and the viability of these models in various educational contexts.

Keywords

Collaborative Approach; Linguistics Teaching; Grounded Theory; Language Competence;Multimedia Learning,

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. Hariyanto, “Tren Kajian Terjemahan dan Industri Terjemahan,” J. Linguist. Terap., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017.

S. Ku and S. Ünlü, “Teaching translation : A suggested lesson plan on translation of advertising through the use of authentic materials,” vol. 199, pp. 407–414, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.526.

E. Nida, Contexts in Translating. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001.

A. Karimnia, “Undergraduate translation training : In search of a model,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 70, pp. 915–921, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.138.

M. Azizinezhad and M. Hashemib, “Teaching translation courses, back to basics, desirable or not?,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 28, pp. 426–429, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.081.

K. Johnson, David, W., Johnson, Roger, T., & Smith, Cooperative Learning: Increasing Collage Faculty Instructional Productivity. 1991.

Kiraly, “Summary of discussion on collaboration, teamwork and group work. Innovation and E Learning p.51-57,” 2000.

E. H. Barros, “Collaborative learning in the translation classroom: preliminary survey results,” no. 16, pp. 42–60, 2011.

H. Lee-jahnke, “Interdisciplinary approach in translation didactics,” Riv. internazionale di Tec. della traduzione., pp. 1–12, 2011.

S. Bonvallet, J. De Luce, S. Bonvallet, and J. De Luce, “Roles for Technology in Collaborative Teaching Roles for Technology in Collaborative Teaching,” vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 295–303, 2019.

M. Cem and S. Kokturk, “The effects of technology on translation students in academic translation teaching,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 197, no. February, pp. 1085–1094, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.349.

R. . Keyes, C. S., Puzio, Kelly., & Jimenez, “Collaborative Translations : Designing Bilingual Instructional Tools,” J. Educ. Vol. 194, No. 2, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 17–24, 2019.

C. La Rocca, M. Margottini, and R. Capobianco, “Collaborative Learning in Higher Education,” no. February, pp. 61–66, 2014.

M. Aderi, C. Noh, S. Andayani, and M. Yusuf, “Collaborative Learning Technique within Higher Learning Education Students,” Creat. Educ., vol. 9, pp. 2367–2375, 2018, doi: 10.4236/ce.2018.914177.

K. Puzio and G. T. Colby, “Journal of Research on Educational Cooperative Learning and Literacy : A Meta-Analytic Review Cooperative Learning and Literacy : A Meta-Analytic Review,” vol. 6:4, no. December 2014, pp. 37–41, 2013, doi: 10.1080/19345747.2013.775683.

D. August and T. Shanahan, “English Language Learners : Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners — Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth,” J. Lit. Res., vol. 41, pp. 432–452, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10862960903340165.

R. E. Slavin and A. Cheung, Effective Reading Programs for English Language Learners A Best-Evidence Synthesis, vol. 66. 2003.

F. Genesee, K. Lindholm-leary, W. Saunders, and D. Christian, “English Language Learners in U . S . Schools : An Overview of Research Findings,” vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 363–385, 2005.

E. Learners and R. Gersten, “What we Know About Effective Instructional Practices for,” vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 454–470, 2000.

P. M. Lightbown, “Anniversary Article Classroom SLA Research and Second Language Teaching,” pp. 431–462, 2000.

N. Taguchi, “Collaborative Dialogue in Learning Pragmatics : Pragmatic-Related Episodes as an Opportunity for Learning Request-Making,” no. January 2016, 2017, doi: 10.1093/applin/amu039.

N. Zarrinabadi and A. Ebrahimi, “Increasing peer collaborative dialogue using a flipped classroom strategy,” Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.1080/17501229.2018.1455688.

A. Ammar and R. M. Hassan, “Talking It Through : Collaborative Dialogue and Second language Learning,” a J. Res. Lang. Stud., pp. 1–37, 2017, doi: 10.1111/lang.12254.

A. Baradaran and M. Moezzy, “A Study of the Role of Collaborative Negotiation in the Acquisition of Lexical Meaning,” Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2252–2259, 2011.

M. W. Cole, “Rompiendo el Silencio : Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Peer-Mediated Learning at Improving Language Outcomes for ELLs,” Biling. Res. J. J. Natl. Assoc. Biling. Educ., vol. 36, no. August 2014, pp. 37–41, 2013, doi: 10.1080/15235882.2013.814609.

R. Haydan, “*Graduated in 22 February 2013 from English Education Study Program of Indonesia University of Education,” J. English Educ., no. 2007, pp. 57–64, 2013.

C. Urquhart, Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications, 2022.

K. Charmaz, Constructionism anf The Grounded Theory Method. 2000.

S. Gasson and J. Waters, “Using A Grounded Theory Approach To Study Online Collaboration Behaviors *,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 22, pp. 95–118, 2013.

R. Thornberg, “A Grounded Theory of Collaborative Synchronizing in Relation to Challenging Students,” SAGE Publ., no. 47, pp. 312–342, 2012.

M. Birks and J. Mills, GROUNDED THEORY. SAGE Publication Ltd, 2015.

I. Nurjannah, J. Mills, T. Park, and K. Usher, “Conducting a Grounded Theory Study in a Language Other Than English : Procedures for Ensuring the Integrity of Translation,” SAGE Open, pp. 1–10, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2158244014528920.

J. Corbin and A. Strauss, “Grounded Theory Research : Procedures , Canons , and Evaluative Criteria,” J. Qual. Sociol., vol. 13, no. 1, 1990.

Emzir, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data Jakarta. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2010.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, “Qualitative inquiry and research design (international student edition): Choosing among five approaches,” Language (Baltim)., vol. 25, no. 459p, p. 23cm, 2018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v12i2.28379