The Correlation Between TOEFL Reading Score and Critical Reading Comprehension of EFL Students

Resti Anggriyani; Ruslin Ruslin; Dzakiah Dzakiah; Hijrah Syam

doi:10.31764/leltj.v13i1.31500

The Correlation Between TOEFL Reading Score and Critical Reading Comprehension of EFL Students

Resti Anggriyani, Ruslin Ruslin, Dzakiah Dzakiah, Hijrah Syam

Abstract

TOEFL has played a very important role in predicting students’ academic performance. However, very limited research has specifically addressed the relationship between the TOEFL reading section and students’ critical reading comprehension, as most existing studies predominantly focused on the correlation between overall TOEFL scores and students’ academic performance in general, such as GPA. This research examined the correlation between TOEFL reading score and critical reading comprehension of TBI students at UIN Datokarama Palu. A quantitative approach through correlational design was employed with 30 students as participants. Data were collected by using TOEFL reading test and GPA of critical reading comprehension course of students. Pearson product moment correlation was used to analyze the data. The results revealed a significant positive moderate correlation (r = 0.587, p = 0.01) between two variables. Reflecting that as one variable increases, the other variables tend to increase as well with a meaningful but not perfectly linear relationship. This indicates that students’ proficiency in the TOEFL reading section not only reflects their reading ability in English generally, but also correlates with their capacity to understand, analyze, interpret, and evaluate information in the reading text critically. By integrating TOEFL reading test into students’ critical reading exercises, educators can strengthen students’ critical reading comprehension that emphasizes determining main idea, identifying arguments, and evaluating evidences.

Keywords

TOEFL reading score; Critical reading comprehension; EFL students; GPA

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. Papageorgiou, S. Wu, C. N. Hsieh, R. J. Tannenbaum, and M. Cheng, “Mapping the TOEFL iBT® test scores to China’s standards of English language ability: implications for score interpretation and use,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 1–49, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12281.

D. Phillips, Longman Complete Course for the Paper-based TOEFL Test, New York: Adison Wisley Longman Inc, 2001.

A. Suherman, and L. Kertawijaya, “A TOEFL training for students of grade xii SMAN 1 Masbagik for the preparation of overseas scholarship applications.” Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat vol 7, no. 3, pp. 781-789, 2023, https://doi.org/10.32832/abdidos.v7i3.1713 [Online]. Available: http://pkm.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ABDIDOS/issue/archive.

M. B. Mulumba, “Improving student teachers’ knowledge-base in language education through critical reading,” Pedagog. Cult. Soc., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 571–586, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14681366.2016.1196233.

S. R. Jaelani, H. Wathoni, B. Purnama, H. Harianto, and S. Wadi, “The students’ ability in reading comprehension of TOEFL test for the EFL learners,” JSHP J. Sos. Hum. dan Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 60–66, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.32487/jshp.v6i1.1296.

R. Corrado, S. Khat, and A. Liwan, “Correlation between English proficiency and academic performances in a Cambodian University,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355583984

A. Pranita Devi, “The relationship between English proficiency and academic achievement of Indonesian EFL postgraduate students,” J. English Lang. Learn., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 303–308, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31949/jell.v7i1.5566.

John W. Creswell and Timothy C. Guetterman, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative, 6th ed, New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2019.

T. G. Reio, “Nonexperimental research: strengths, weaknesses and issues of precision,” Eur. J. Train. Dev., vol. 40, no. 8–9, pp. 676–690, 2016, doi: 10.1108/EJTD-07-2015-0058.

D. Makwana, P. Engineer, A. Dabhi and H. Chudasama, “Sampling methods in research: a review.” Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., vol. 07, no. 03, pp. 762-768, 2023, doi: 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-52 [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371985656.

D. Indarti, “Analyzing critical thinking skills in reading comprehension section of TOEFL book” unpublished.

S. E. Kemp, J. Hort, and T. Hollowood, Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, 1st ed, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2018.

A. Ghanad, “An Overview of Quantitative Research Methods,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Anal., vol. 06, no. 08, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.47191/ijmra/v6-i8-52.

F. Hilal Yagin, B. Yagin, and A. Pinar, “Normality distributions commonly used in sport and health sciences,” J. Exerc. Sci. Phys. Act. Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 124-131, 2024, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11544808.

Z. Hanusz, J. Tarasinska, and W. Zielinski, “Shapiro-wilk test with known mean,” Statistic Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89-100, Feb, 2016.

A. Ghasemi and S. Zahediasl, “Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians,” Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 486–489, 2012, doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505.

L. Cohen, L. Manion and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 8th ed, New York: Routledge, 2018.

B. A. Nadea B, Jumariati, and Nasrullah “Bottom-up or top-down reading strategies: reading strategies used by EFL students,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Edu. Humanit. Res., vol. 587, pp. 30-36, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211021.005.

R. Smith, P. Snow, T. Serry, and L. Hammond, “The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review,” Read. Psychol., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 214–240, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348.

F. B. Alfiatunnur and C. A. Kamil, “Strategies in dealing with the reading section of TOEFL prediction’: a case of Aceh EFL learners,” IJEE (Indonesian J. English Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 159-171, 2020, doi: 10.15408/ijee.v7i1.17622.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i1.31500