A Case Study of Analyzing Students’ Focus in Writing
Abstract
Maintaining focus in writing is among the underemphasized but critical areas of academic literacy, particularly among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Indonesian EFL learners mostly put more effort into maintaining thematic coherence and logical coherence of writing despite their operationally effective grammatical and lexical control. Although writing pedagogy is a stronghold of language instruction, little has been investigated in Indonesia which seeks to investigate students' capacity to maintain focus, a fundamental skill in guaranteeing coherent and effective texts. This research was prompted by the noted lack of pedagogical focus and empirical investigation of focus in writing, and particularly at the tertiary level. Using a qualitative case study design, the researcher examined the writing of 25 second-semester business management students. Participants were tasked with composing personal narratives and reflecting on their writing experiences. After that, the students' writings were evaluated based on five criteria, such as clarity of main idea, relevance of supporting details, consistency, topic unity, transitions and coherence. Findings reveal that the majority of students demonstrated Limited to Basic proficiency in all five areas with the highest deficiencies observed in topic unity and consistency. Also, most of the students can write sentences but struggle to organize and connect the ideas logically correspond to the theme. The data also shows that the participants faced significant linguistic and cognitive challenges, such in expressing ideas fluently, selecting appropriate vocabulary, and understanding genre-based writing. This study underscores the urgent need for a pedagogical shift that adopt a process-based which constructivist approaches that view writing as a repeated activity involving planning, drafting, reviewing, and revising. Such an approach recognizes that effective writing instruction must extend beyond grammatical correctness and surface-level features.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
S. Lamtara, “New Technology and the Process Based Approach to Writing,” SSRN Electron. J., 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2822986.
M. Kadmiry, “The Comparison between the Process-oriented Approach and the Product-oriented Approach in Teaching Writing The Case of Moroccan EFL Students in Preparatory Classes for the Grandes Ecoles,” Arab World English J., vol. 12, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol12no1.14.
B. A. L. Click, “Educating students to write effectively,” New Dir. High. Educ., vol. 1996, no. 96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/he.36919969605.
J. Liu, “How writing works: a field guide to effective academic writing,” Educ. Rev., vol. 75, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00131911.2022.2147287.
Y. V. Lysanets, O. M. Bieliaieva, L. B. Slipchenko, K. H. Havrylieva, and H. Y. Morokhovets, “Essential Features of Effective Academic Writing in English,” Med. Ecol. Probl., vol. 25, no. 1–2, 2021, doi: 10.31718/mep.2021.25.1-2.10.
K. Van de Poel and J. Gasiorek, “Effects of an efficacy-focused approach to academic writing on students’ perceptions of themselves as writers,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 11, no. 4, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.07.003.
A. Wilson, “What is a text?,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A, vol. 43, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.027.
J. HorbaĿauskienĿ and R. KasperaviĿienĿ, “Writing Assignments as a Way of Enhancing Foreign Language Proficiency at University Studies,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 232, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.037.
L. Dynan and T. Cate, “The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured?,” Int. Rev. Econ. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 64–86, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30078-5.
T. L. Larkin, “A Rubric to Enrich Student Writing and Understanding,” Int. J. Eng. Pedagog., vol. 5, no. 2, 2015, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v5i2.4587.
A. R. Rezaei and M. Lovorn, “Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing,” Assess. Writ., vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003.
S. Abegglen, T. Burns, and S. Sinfield, “Supporting student writing and other modes of learning and assessment: a staff guide,” J. Learn. Dev. High. Educ., no. 25, 2022, doi: 10.47408/jldhe.vi25.961.
A. S. Canagarajah, “Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between languages: Learning from multilingual writers,” 2006. doi: 10.2307/25472177.
M. Muamaroh, V. C. Mukti, and D. Haryanti, “The Process and Problems of EFL Learners in English Writing,” Ethical Ling. J. Lang. Teach. Lit., vol. 7, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.30605/25409190.215.
H. Kobayashi and C. Rinnert, “Factors Affecting Composition Evaluation in an EFL Context: Cultural Rhetorical Pattern and Readers’ Background,” Lang. Learn., vol. 46, no. 3, 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01242.x.
B. Giridharan, “Identifying Gaps in Academic Writing of ESL Students *,” US-China Educ. Rev. A, vol. 6, 2012.
N. Joseph, “Metacognition Needed: Teaching Middle and High School Students to Develop Strategic Learning Skills,” Prev. Sch. Fail. Altern. Educ. Child. Youth, vol. 54, no. 2, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10459880903217770.
A. Cresswell, “Self-monitoring in student writing: developing learner responsibility,” ELT J., vol. 54, no. 3, 2000, doi: 10.1093/elt/54.3.235.
K. Cho and C. Schunn, “Developing writing skills through students giving instructional explanations,” in Instructional Explanations in the Disciplines, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0594-9_13.
I. A. Dragomir and B.-O. Niculescu, “Different Approaches to Developing Writing Skills,” L. Forces Acad. Rev., vol. 25, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.2478/raft-2020-0024.
K. Hyland, Second Language Writing. 2003. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511667251.
D. R. Ferris and J. S. Hedgcock, Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203813003.
L. Flower and J. R. Hayes, “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing,” Coll. Compos. Commun., vol. 32, no. 4, 1981, doi: 10.2307/356600.
R. GOCTU, “Metacognitive Strategies in Academic Writing,” J. Educ. Black Sea Reg., vol. 2, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.31578/jebs.v2i2.44.
T. Sanders and H. Pander Maat, “Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches,” in Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2006. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00497-1.
A. Sanford, “Coherence: Psycholinguistic Approach,” in Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2006. doi: 10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00802-6.
R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, vol. 53, no. 5. 2018. doi: 10.1177/109634809702100108.
R. T. Kellogg, “Writing Process, Psychology of,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. doi: 10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01562-x.
L. Y. Li and J. Vandermensbrugghe, “Supporting the thesis writing process of international research students through an ongoing writing group,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 48, no. 2, 2011, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2011.564014.
R. Negretti, “Metacognition in Student Academic Writing: A Longitudinal Study of Metacognitive Awareness and Its Relation to Task Perception, Self-Regulation, and Evaluation of Performance,” Writ. Commun., vol. 29, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0741088312438529.
J. Ewing, “Metacognition and the teaching of writing,” 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.21954/ou.ro.0000e8cd.
Z. G. Shooshtari and F. Mir, “ZPD, Tutor; Peer Scaffolding: Sociocultural Theory in Writing Strategies Application,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 98, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.605.
K. Hyland, Genre and Second Language Writing. 2016. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23927.
D. H. Slomp, “Challenges in assessing the development of writing ability: Theories, constructs and methods,” Assess. Writ., vol. 17, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.asw.2012.02.001.
M. Cáceres, M. Nussbaum, and J. Ortiz, “Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 37, p. 100674, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.TSC.2020.100674.
P. Deane, “Writing Assessment and Cognition,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2011, no. 1, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02250.x.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i1.31874
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ronika Apriyanti Manik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
Linguistics and ELT Journal
p-ISSN 2339-2940 | e-ISSN 2614-8633

LELTJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:
_____________________________________________________
LELTJ Editorial Office:




