Recontextualization of Power Symbols in Public Space: The “Tot Tot Wuk Wuk” Phenomenon in Indonesia Through a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis Approach

Nio Awandha Nehru; Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati; Dewi Suspaningrum

doi:10.31764/leltj.v13i2.36428

Recontextualization of Power Symbols in Public Space: The “Tot Tot Wuk Wuk” Phenomenon in Indonesia Through a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis Approach

Nio Awandha Nehru, Dwi Astuti Wahyu Nurhayati, Dewi Suspaningrum

Abstract

This study aims to analyze how symbols of state authority are recontextualized and transformed within digital public spaces through the “Tot Tot Wuk Wuk” phenomenon in Indonesia, employing a Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) approach and a constructive qualitative methodology with Genre and Multimodal (GeM) analysis design. The phenomenon illustrates the appropriation of state authority symbols, such as strobe lights, sirens, and imitation license plates by civilians without official authorization. These acts not only constitute legal violations but also serve as social expressions of status and prestige. Drawing on Theo van Leeuwen’s framework of social actor representation and recontextualization, as well as Kress and van Leeuwen’s concept of social modality, this research analyzes visual, verbal, and legal modes across various online media texts, digital images, and viral social media videos. Using a constructive qualitative methodology, the study goes beyond mere description to interpret the social and ideological meanings underlying these symbolic practices, integrating the researcher’s reflective interpretation as the primary analytical instrument. The findings reveal that the “Tot Tot Wuk Wuk” phenomenon operates as a multimodal discourse interlinking legality, morality, and the performativity of power. Symbols of authority are recontextualized into tools of social identity expression, signifying status disparities and the desire for symbolic legitimacy within public spaces. However, this study is limited by its reliance on secondary data, which constrains deeper validation of audience perceptions and real-world behavioral impacts related to the “Tot Tot Wuk Wuk” phenomenon

Keywords

Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis; Recontextualization; Symbols of Power; Tot Tot Wuk Wuk

Full Text:

PDF

References

G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen, Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge, 2020.

Herna, Hidayaturahmi, Hiswanti, and Rahmadiana, “Stop Tot Tot Wuk Wuk: viral humor and public pushback in Indonesia’s digital sphere,” Media Asia, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01296612.2025.2566426.

D. F. Arifin, I. Harahap, and B. Kadaryanto, “Implementasi Terhadap Larangan Penggunaan Lampu Strobo Pada Kendaraan Pribadi Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Pekanbaru Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 6 SE-Articles, pp. 5290–5297, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16707.

I. Septiawan, Mulyadi, and R. Syamsul Ma’arif, “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Penggunaan Sirine dan Lampu Isyarat pada Kendaraan Pribadi di Wilayah Hukum Polres Bogor,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 8 SE-Articles, pp. 9209–9223, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i8.15086.

Kumparan, “Arti Stop Tot Tot Wuk Wuk sebagai Gerakan Protes Pengguna Jalan,” kumparan.com. [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/berita-hari-ini/arti-stop-tot-tot-wuk-wuk-sebagai-gerakan-protes-pengguna-jalan-25srZAK5ZYH

T. Wulandari, “Protes ‘Stop Tot Tot Wuk Wuk’, Pakar IPB: Potensi Pembangkangan Sipil,” detik.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-8131279/protes-stop-tot-tot-wuk-wuk-pakar-ipb-potensi-pembangkangan-sipil

R. V. Aresta and I. E. Pratiwi, “Daftar Kendaraan yang Boleh Pasang Lampu Strobo dan Sirene ‘Tot Tot Wuk Wuk,’” kompas.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2025/09/20/173000465/daftar-kendaraan-yang-boleh-pasang-lampu-strobo-dan-sirene-tot-tot-wuk-wuk-?page=all

A. Mayr, “11. Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA),” Handb. Spr. im multimodalen Kontext, pp. 261–276, 2016.

W. Udasmoro, Hamparan wacana: dari praktik ideologi, media, hingga kritik poskolonial. Penerbit Ombak, 2018.

T. Van Leeuwen, Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford university press, 2008.

J. Bezemer and G. Kress, Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Routledge, 2015.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, 2016.

T. Hiippala, “11 Multimodal Genre Analysis,” Interact. images texts A Read. multimodality, vol. 11, p. 111, 2014.

G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen, “Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour,” Vis. Commun., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 343–368, 2002.

T. Van Leeuwen, “The representation of social actors,” in Texts and practices, Routledge, 2013, pp. 32–70.

T. Van Leeuwen and R. Wodak, “Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis,” Discourse Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–118, 1999.

G. R. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen, “Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication,” (No Title), 2001.

B. Aditya, “Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Program Makan Bergizi dalam Media Tirto. Id dan Tempo. Co.” Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, 2025.

N. Couldry and A. Hepp, The mediated construction of reality. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

F. Hindriks, “The Social Construction of Collective Moral Agency,” Soc. Theory Pract., vol. 50, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.5840/soctheorpract202475221.

A. L. Siregar, B. Gurning, and D. Santoso, “Stereotyped Language about Women on Internet Memes of Meme Comic Indonesia (A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis),” Linguist. Terap., vol. 15, no. 2 SE-Articles, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.24114/lt.v15i2.12350.

I. Yustisia et al., The Transformation of Digital Technology: Its Impact on Human Communication. 2023. doi: 10.11594/futscipress39m.

L. R. R. Rifki, “Political of Religion in Digital Era: Analysis of Jean Baudrillard’s Thoughts,” J. Penelit. Keislam., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 66–80, 2025.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, “Undang Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Angkutan Jalan,” Jakarta, 2009.

Polri, “Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 Tentang Registrasi dan Identifikasi Kendaraan Bermotor,” Jakarta, 2021.

N. Fairclough, “Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research.” Routledge, 2003.

R. Sholehurrohman, K. Muludi, and J. Triloka, “Optimizing Transportation Surveillance With Yolov7: Detection and Classification of Vehicle License Plate Colors,” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 812–820, 2025.

D. Hartono, S. Prima, and W. Dewobroto, “A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of Garnier Green Beauty Advertisement,” Int. J. English Appl. Linguist., vol. 2, pp. 301–312, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.47709/ijeal.v2i2.1654.

S. Guzzini, “The Concept of Power: A Constructivist Analysis,” Millenn. - J. Int. Stud., vol. 33, pp. 495–521, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/03058298050330031301.

A. Fuadi, “Social media power for protest in Indonesia: The Yogyakarta’s# gejayanmemanggil case study,” J. Stud. Komun. (Indonesian J. Commun. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 541, 2020.

K. Krismiyati, I. A. Nugraha, M. Imanita, S. Sasono, and F. Amin, “Digital activism in social movements and its influence on the implementation of state administration in Indonesia,” Minist. J. Birokrasi dan Pemerintah. Drh., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 123–132, 2023.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i2.36428