The Students' Perceptions on Quillbot Platform Usage As A Digital Learning Assistant in English Writing Class

Muliana Muliana; Ardiana Ardiana; Muhammad Zia Ul Haq Zia Ul Haq

doi:10.31764/leltj.v13i2.36454

The Students' Perceptions on Quillbot Platform Usage As A Digital Learning Assistant in English Writing Class

Muliana Muliana, Ardiana Ardiana, Muhammad Zia Ul Haq Zia Ul Haq

Abstract

This study aimed to examine students’ perceptions of using QuillBot as a digital learning assistant in an English writing class at Bosowa University. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method and involved six third-semester students who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that students held positive perceptions of QuillBot, as its features helped improve writing quality, enrich vocabulary, correct grammatical errors, and save time in completing assignments. However, several challenges were also identified, including changes in meaning after paraphrasing, confusion caused by multiple mode options, limited access in the free version, and the potential decline in writing independence. Overall, QuillBot was considered beneficial as a supporting tool, but its use needed to be balanced with independent writing practice to ensure the continued development of students’ language skills.

Keywords

QuillBot; Students’ Perceptions; English Writing

Full Text:

PDF

References

T. N. Fitria, “QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing,” Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 183, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233.

A. R. Jaladara, M. B. Jafar, and K. Salija, “Quillbot Web-Application: Utilizing Online Technology on Academic Writing at an Indonesian Islamic Higher Education,” Celebes Journal of Language Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 275–284, 2023, doi: 10.51629/cjls.v3i2.152.

E. Y. Kurniati and R. Fithriani, “Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class,” Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 437, 2022, doi: 10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852.

T. N. Fitria, “Avoiding Plagiarism of Students’ Scientific Writing by Using the QuillBot Paraphraser,” Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 2022, doi: 10.31849/elsya.v4i3.9917.

Amanda Amanda, Elsa Muliani Sukma, Nursyahrina Lubis, and Utami Dewi, “Quillbot As An AI-powered English Writing Assistant: An Alternative For Students to Write English,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 188–199, 2023, doi: 10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026.

S. Latifah, A. Muth’im, and N. Nasrullah, “The Use of QuillBot in Academic Writing,” Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 110–121, 2024, doi: 10.33503/journey.v7i1.4047.

N. Nurmayanti and S. Suryadi, “The Effectiveness Of Using Quillbot In Improving Writing For Students Of English Education Study Program,” Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 32, 2023, doi: 10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392.

M. J. Sousa, A. L. Marôco, S. P. Gonçalves, and A. de B. Machado, “Digital Learning Is an Educational Format towards Sustainable Education,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1140, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031140.

N. Y. Suryani, S. Rizal, T. Rohani, And H. Ratnaningsih, “Improving Learners’ English Writing Skills Through Digital Technology And Project-Based Learning,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–34, May 2024, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32506.

A. Imron, W. Candra Hantari, and T. Arochman, “What to Consider When Creating Digital-based Learning Materials for Creative Writing Class,” Education of English as a Foreign Language Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 95–103, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.21776/ub.educafl.2022.005.02.04.

K. T. Sipayung et al., “Persepsi Peserta Kampus Mengajar terhadap Profil Lulusan Program Studi,” Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 628–641, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v5i1.4069.

S. Latifah, A. Muth’im, and N. Nasrullah, “The Use of QuillBot in Academic Writing,” Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 110–121, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.33503/journey.v7i1.4047.

C. A. Wolters and A. C. Brady, “College Students’ Time Management: a Self-Regulated Learning Perspective,” Educ Psychol Rev, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1319–1351, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z.

S. Aldabbus and E. Almansouri, “Academic Writing Difficulties Encountered by University EFL Learners,” British Journal of English Language Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.37745/bjel.2013/vol10n3111.

A. L. Dwi Putri, A. Tambusai, and A. L. Hasibuan, “Students’ Difficulties in Acquiring English Writing,” International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–26, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.55299/ijere.v1i1.21.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i2.36454