Pelatihan edukasi budaya anti-korupsi partisipatif sebagai strategi penguatan akuntabilitas mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi

Suriadi Ardiansyah, Novandi Firdaus Yusup, Opan Satria Mandala, Yorman Yorman, Muhammad Tahir, Nurhafni Nurhafni

Abstract


Abstrak

Praktik korupsi di lingkungan perguruan tinggi masih menjadi tantangan serius dalam mewujudkan tata kelola kampus yang berintegritas, mengingat perguruan tinggi merupakan ruang strategis dalam pembentukan karakter generasi muda. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan dan mengimplementasikan program edukasi budaya anti-korupsi berbasis pembelajaran partisipatif sebagai upaya penguatan sikap akuntabilitas mahasiswa. Mitra sasaran kegiatan adalah mahasiswa dari tiga fakultas di perguruan tinggi, dengan jumlah peserta sebanyak 120 orang yang dipilih secara purposif. Metode pelaksanaan kegiatan berupa pelatihan dan pendampingan edukatif yang dilaksanakan selama delapan minggu melalui pendekatan participatory learning, meliputi penyampaian materi konseptual, studi kasus kontekstual, diskusi reflektif, simulasi pengambilan keputusan etis, serta refleksi individu. Evaluasi kegiatan dilakukan melalui pengukuran sikap akuntabilitas sebelum dan sesudah pelaksanaan kegiatan menggunakan instrumen yang telah tervalidasi. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan skor rata-rata sikap akuntabilitas mahasiswa dari 3,42 pada tahap awal menjadi 4,15 pada tahap akhir (skala 5), dengan selisih peningkatan sebesar 0,73 poin yang signifikan secara statistik (p < 0,01). Peningkatan terjadi pada indikator kejujuran, tanggung jawab, transparansi, dan keberanian melapor. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kegiatan edukasi budaya anti-korupsi berbasis pembelajaran partisipatif efektif dalam memperkuat akuntabilitas mahasiswa serta mendukung pengembangan budaya integritas dan tata kelola kampus yang baik.

 

Kata kunci: edukasi anti‑korupsi; akuntabilitas; gratifikasi; participatory learning; perguruan tinggi.

 Abstract

Corrupt practices in the university environment are still a serious challenge in realizing campus governance with integrity, considering that universities are strategic spaces in the formation of the character of the younger generation. This community service activity aims to develop and implement an anti-corruption cultural education program based on participatory learning as an effort to strengthen student accountability attitudes. The target partners of the activity were students from three faculties at universities, with a total of 120 participants who were selected purposively. The method of implementing activities in the form of training and educational assistance which was carried out for eight weeks through a participatory learning approach, included the delivery of conceptual materials, contextual case studies, reflective discussions, simulations of ethical decision-making, and individual reflection. Evaluation of activities is carried out through the measurement of accountability attitudes before and after the implementation of activities using validated instruments. The results showed an increase in the average score of student accountability attitudes from 3.42 in the initial stage to 4.15 in the final stage (scale 5), with a difference of 0.73 points in a statistically significant increase (p < 0.01). An increase occurred in the indicators of honesty, responsibility, transparency, and courage to report. These findings show that participatory learning-based anti-corruption culture education activities are effective in strengthening student accountability and supporting the development of a culture of integrity and good campus governance.

 

Keywords: anti-corruption education; accountability; gratuities; participatory learning; colleges.

 


Keywords


anti-corruption education; accountability; gratuities; participatory learning; colleges.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi et al. (2025). Peran Mahasiswa dalam Edukasi Anti Korupsi : Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Berbasis Service Learning. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 22(2), 216–232.

Ajzen & Fishbein. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading,. MA: Addison-Wesley.

Aksinudin et al. (2022). Instilling anti-corruption characters in civic education for college students, 19(1), 53–64.

Arifiyanti et al. (2022). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi pada Mahasiswa : Pendisiplinan Tubuh dan Tantangan Sengkarut Perilaku, 490–496. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v2i3.1910

Berkowitz et al. (2020). The eleven principles of effective character education: A Brief History. Journal of Character Education, 16(2), 1–10.

Butarbutar, A. N. (2022). Pentingnya Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Dalam Dunia Pendidikan Terkhusus Pada Perguruan Tinggi Guna Pencegahan Korupsi, 4(1), 133–139.

Carr, D. (2023). Love , knowledge ( wisdom ) and justice : Moral education beyond the cultivation of Aristotelian virtuous character. Journal of Moral Education, 5(03), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2219029

Cerah, D., Hulu, A., Lase, N. K., Biologi, P., Nias, U., Biologi, P., … Gunungsitoli, U. N. (2025). Pentingnya karakter di lingkungan kampus 1) , 02, 69–75.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London: Routledge.

Freire. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum. New York: Continuum.

Hadi. (2011). Pembelajaran Sosial Emosional Sebagai Dasar Pendidikan Karakter Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Teknodik, 15(2), 227–240. Retrieved from https://jurnalteknodik.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jurnalteknodik/article/view/104

Hayati et al. (2025). Student Perceptions on Developing an Anti-Corruption. International Journal of Cultural and Social Science Published: Pena Cendekia Insani, 6(3), 797–803.

Hidayah, S. F., & Kuswandi, A. (2024). Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Anti Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi Studi Deskriftif di Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi, 1, 36–48.

Irsyadi et la. (2024). Pengaruh Pendidikan Anti-Korupsi Terhadap Perilaku Generasi Muda di Indonesia. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 09.

Johnson. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Karini, L. J. (2022). Peran Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Menerapkan Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Kalangan Mahasiswa, 4(1), 156–165.

Keng et al. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New York: Prentice Hall.

Komalasari. (2012). The living values-based contextual learning to develop the students ’ character. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 246–251.

Krettenauer, N. &. (2022). Handbook of Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896

Lave & Wenge. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lickona. (2019). Character Education, a complete guide to educate students to be smart and good. Bandung: CV Nusa Media.

Lukmantoro et al. (2024). The Principal’s Leadership in Strengthening Character Education in the Digital Literacy Era: A Study at Vocational School. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(4), 906–918. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i4.623

Made, N., & Dwi, S. (2022). Penguatan Nilai Karakter Serta Pembentukan Pendidikan Humanistik Melalui Penanaman Mindset Antikorupsi Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi, 4(1), 143–152.

Nyoman, N., & Permatasari, R. (2022). Upaya Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Pendidikan Anti Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi, 4(1), 108–117.

OECD. (2018). Education for integrity: Teaching about anti-corruption, values and the rule of law. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305090-en

Pusvitasari et al. (2024). Peningkatan Kejujuran Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Melalui Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Putri. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 13(April), 17–24. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.131.03

Ramadhan, F. N. (2020). Values Of Kedempling Dance In Social Science Learning Based On Behavioristic Learning Theory. Journal of Theory and Praxis of Learning Social Sciences, 5(2), 114–124.

Reddy, L. A. (2023). Advancing the science of coaching in education: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of School Psychology, 96(December 2022), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2022.10.003

Suhandi, M. F., & Agustin, S. (2023). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Pada Jenjang Perguruan Tinggi, 01(01), 19–27.

Tang. (2015). Global citizenship education: topics and learning objectives. Global citizenship education: topics and learning objectives. https://doi.org/10.54675/drhc3544

Tsoraya et al. (2023). Pentingnya Pendidikan Karakter Terhadap Moralitas Pelajar di Lingkungan Masyarakat Era Digital. Literaksi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan e-ISSN:, xx(xx), 7–12.

UNESCO. (2021). Digital citizenship education: Competencies for the digital age. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374938

UNESCO. (2024). Global citizenship education in a digital age: Teacher guidelines. paris: UNESCO.

Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

Witarsa. (2023). Optimizing Anti-Corruption Education in Higher Education : Enhancing Awareness and Promoting Action against Corruption among University Students. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 4(3), 897–905.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v%25vi%25i.37828

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

______________________________________________________

Jurnal Selaparang

p-ISSN 2614-5251 || e-ISSN 2614-526X

 

EDITORIAL OFFICE: