ANALISIS KESIAPAN PEMBELAJARAN E-LEARNING SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19 DI SMK NEGERI 1 TAMBELANGAN

Syamsul Jamal

doi:10.31764/paedagoria.v11i2.2467

ANALISIS KESIAPAN PEMBELAJARAN E-LEARNING SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19 DI SMK NEGERI 1 TAMBELANGAN

Syamsul Jamal

Abstract

Abstrak: Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana Kesiapan Pembelajaran e-learning saat pandemic COVID-19 di SMK Negeri 1 Tambelangan dalam enam aspek kesiapan (kesiapan peserta didik, kesiapan guru, kesiapan infrastruktur, dukungan managemen, budaya sekolah, dan kecenderungan terhadap tatap muka). Model E-Learning Readiness yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Model Teddy & Swatman (2006) menggunakan enam faktor kesiapan. Enam faktor tersebut adalah kesiapan peserta didik, kesiapan guru, infrastruktur, dukungan managemen, budaya sekolah dan kecenderungan pembelajaran tatap muka. Faktor kesiapan peserta didik diperoleh nilai sebesar 3,8 dalam skala 5. Menurut tabel rentang nilai dan kategori (Aydin & Tasci 2005 : 2015) bahwa dengan nilai tersebut dinyatakan siap tetapi membutuhkan sedikit peningkatan. Faktor kesiapan guru, Faktor dukungan management serta faktor budaya sekolah diperoleh nilai sebesar 4,2. Menurut tabel rentang nilai dan kategori (Aydin & Tasci 2005 : 2015) bahwa dengan nilai tersebut siap penerapan e-learning dapat dilanjutkan. Hanya 1 faktor yang tidak siap dan perlu peningkatan adalah Faktor Kecenderungan pembelajaran e-learning dengan nilai ELR sebesar 3,3

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to find out how e-learning Learning Readiness during the COVID-19 pandemic at SMK Negeri 1 Tambelang in six aspects of readiness (student readiness, teacher readiness, infrastructure readiness, management support, school culture, and trends in face-to-face).The E-Learning Readiness model used in this study is the Teddy & Swatman Model (2006) using six readiness factors. The six factors are the readiness of students, teacher readiness, infrastructure, management support, school culture and the tendency of face-to-face learning. Student readiness factor obtained value of 3,8 on scale of 5. According to the table of ranges of values and categories (Aydin & Tasci 2005: 2015) that with these values is declared ready but requires a slight increase. Teacher readiness factors, management support factors and School Culture Factors score of 4.2. According to the table of ranges of values and categories (Aydin & Tasci 2005: 2015) that with these values ready for the application of e-learning can be continued. Only 1 factor that is not ready and needs improvement is the e-learning tendency factor with an ELR value of 3.3

Keywords

Learning; e-learning; Pandemic COVID-19.

Full Text:

Download [PDF]

References

Al-araibi, A. A. M., Naz’ri bin Mahrin, M., Yusoff, R. C. M., & Chuprat, S. B. (2019). A model for technological aspect of e-learning readiness in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1395–1431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9837-9

Effendi. (2017). Hubungan Readiness (kesiapan) Belajar Siswa dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Kelas X SMK Muhammadiyah 03 Sukaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika (JPF), 5(1), 15–24.

ERMAWATI, Y. D. W. I., & ... (2019). ANALISIS PENGEMBANGAN ALAT EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS INTRANET. Jurnal Pendidikan ….

Fariani, R. I. (2013). Pengukuran Tingkat Kesiapan E-Learning (E-Learning Readiness). Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI).

Faslah, R., & Santoso, H. (2017). E-Learning Readiness Analysis Using E-Learning Readiness Model. POSITIF : Jurnal Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.31961/positif.v3i2.431

Kemdikbud. (2020). Merdeka belajar: Kampus Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sv8wq

Mandalina, V., Syaharuddin, Firdaus, M., Abdillah, Pramita, D., & Negara, H. R. P. (2019). Math mobile learning app as an interactive multimedia learning mathematics. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 2548–2550.

Mukhtar. (2013). Metode Praktis Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif. In Jakarta: Referensi (GP Press Group.

Negara, H. R. P., Syaharuddin, S., Kurniawati, K. R. A., Mandailina, V., & Santosa, F. H. (2019). Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa Melalui Pemanfaatan Media Belajar Berbasis Android Menggunakan Mit App Inventor. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 2(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v2i2.887

Omoda-Onyait, G., & Lubega, J. T. (2011). E-learning readiness assessment model: A case study of higher institutions of learning in Uganda. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6837 LNCS, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22763-9_19

Rice, S., & Mckendree, J. (2013). e-Learning. In Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice: Second Edition (pp. 161–173). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch12

Schreurs, J., & Al-Huneidi, A. M. (2012). E-Learning Readiness in Organizations. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v5i1.1885

So, K. K. T., & Swatman, P. (2010). The diminishing influence of age and gender on e-learning readiness of teachers in Hong Kong. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6248 LNCS, 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_43

Suherman, E. dkk. (2011). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 133, 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.621

Susanto, R. (2018). Pengkondisian Kesiapan Belajar Untuk Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Dengan Gerakan Senam Otak. Jurnal Eduscience, 3(2), 63.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v11i2.2467