PENDAMPINGAN PENYUSUNAN MILIEU PRAKTIK MENGAJAR GURU BERBASIS RISET UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI SISWA DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo; Irfan Wahyu Prananto; Octavian Muning Sayekti; Nawang Sulistyani

doi:10.31764/jmm.v8i5.26475

PENDAMPINGAN PENYUSUNAN MILIEU PRAKTIK MENGAJAR GURU BERBASIS RISET UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI SISWA DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo, Irfan Wahyu Prananto, Octavian Muning Sayekti, Nawang Sulistyani

Abstract

Abstrak: Kemampuan numerasi siswa Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Bantul masih rendah, sebagaimana ditunjukkan data Asesmen Nasional yang mencatat hanya 46,67% siswa di atas batas minimum, serta hanya 20,5% dari 78 guru yang memiliki tingkat numerasi tinggi. Rendahnya kemampuan ini disebabkan oleh pembelajaran yang belum berbasis riset. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan numerasi siswa dan guru masih di bawah rata-rata dan belum optimal sehingga diperlukan pendampingan untuk guru dalam penyusunan milieu praktik mengajar guna meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dan numerasi siswa. Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hardskill guru dalam merancang milieu praktik mengajar berbasis riset dan softskill guru dalam menerapkan strategi pengajaran dalam meningkatkan kemampuan numerasi ssiwa. Metode kegiatan meliputi praktik langsung dan FGD penyusunan milieu dengan melibatkan 25 guru SD serta kolaborasi bersama Dinas Pendidikan Pemuda dan Olahrag Kabupaten Bantul Yogyakarta. Evaluasi dilakukan melalui angket untuk menilai pemahaman konsep, observasi praktik penyusunan milieu, serta umpan balik terkait penerapan strategi. Kegiatan ini berhasil meningkatkan kompetensi guru dalam merancang pembelajaran efektif hingga 90%.

Abstract: Elementary school students' numeracy skills in Bantul Regency still need to improve, as shown by National Assessment data, which recorded only 46.67% of students above the minimum limit and only 20.5% of 78 teachers had a high level of numeracy. This low ability is caused by learning that still needs to be research-based. This finding shows that the numeracy skills of students and teachers are still below average and not optimal, so mentoring is needed for teachers in compiling teaching practice milieu in order to improve the quality of student learning and numeracy. This activity aims to improve teachers' hard skills in designing research-based teaching practice milieu and teachers' soft skills in implementing teaching strategies to improve students' numeracy skills. The activity methods include direct practice and FGD on compiling a milieu involving 25 elementary school teachers and collaboration with the Bantul Regency Youth and Sports Education Office, Yogyakarta. Evaluation is carried out through questionnaires to assess understanding of concepts, observation of milieu compilation practices, and feedback related to strategy implementation. This activity has succeeded in increasing teacher competence in designing effective learning by up to 90%.

Keywords

Milieu; Numeracy; Teacher Assistance; Elementary School.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Akçadaǧ, T. 2010. “The Training Needs of Teachers Concerning Methods & Techniques and Assessment & Evaluation in the Primary School Curriculum.” Bilig 53:29–50.

Amiruddin, Amiruddin, Fiskia Rera Baharuddin, Takbir Takbir, Wirawan Setialaksana, and Nurlaela Nurlaela. 2023. “Andragogy, Peeragogy, Heutagogy and Cybergogy Contribution on Self-Regulated Learning: A Structural Equation Model Approach.” International Journal of Instruction 16(3):551–72. doi: 10.29333/iji.2023.16330a.

Askew, M., M. Brown, V. Rhodes, D. Wiliam, and D. Johnson. 1997. Effective Teachers of Numeracy. 1st ed. London: School of Education, King’s Collage.

Catalano, Michael. 2014. “A Sampling of Popular Books for Numeracy Readers.” Numeracy 7(1):89–119. doi: 10.5038/1936-4660.7.1.7.

Eggen, Paul D., and Don P. Kauchak. 2016. Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms. Vol. 4. 10th ed. Pearson Education Limited.

Garcia, Consuelo, Esther Argelagós, and Jesús Privado. 2023. “Information Skills Instruction in Higher Education Students Using the 4C/ID Model.” Pp. 137–44 in 9th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’23). Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València.

Golovanova, Inna, and Elena Asafova. 2017. “Training of a Modern Teacher in the Settings of Interactive Technologies Implementation.” Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods 11(4):131–42.

Griffiths, Tom G. 2021. “Education to Transform the World: Limits and Possibilities in and against the SDGs and ESD.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 30(1–2):73–92. doi: 10.1080/09620214.2020.1854829.

Kent, Alexander J., Peter Vujakovic, Gwilym Eades, and Martin Davis. 2020. “Putting the UN SDGs on the Map: The Role of Cartography in Sustainability Education.” The Cartographic Journal 57(2):93–96. doi: 10.1080/00087041.2020.1770424.

Kim, Rina, and Lillie R. Albert. 2015. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. 1st ed. Massachusetts: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Lusardi, Annamaria. 2012. “Numeracy, Financial Literacy, and Financial Decision-Making.” Numeracy 2(1):34–67. doi: 10.5038/1936-4660.5.1.2.

Mainali, Bhesh. 2021. “Representation in Teaching and Learning Mathematics.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 15(3):56–78. doi: 10.46328/ijemst.1111.

McNeill, Katherine L., and Amanda M. Knight. 2013. “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K-12 Teachers.” Science Education 12(3):45–57. doi: 10.1002/sce.21081.

Meeks, Linda, Coral Kemp, and Jennifer Stephenson. 2014. “Standards in Literacy and Numeracy: Contributing Factors.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39(7):106–39. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.3.

Munna, Afzal Sayed, and Abul Kalam. 2021. “Teaching and Learning Process to Enhance Teaching Effectiveness: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) 4(1):1–4.

Nartani, C. Indah, Rosidah Aliim Hidayat, and Yohana Sumiyati. 2015. “Communication in Mathematics Contextual.” International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences 2(4):2349–5219.

NCTM. 2000. “Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers Mathematics, Inc.”

Pant, Mandakini. 2006. “Participatory Training.” Learning Package on Participatory Adult Learning, Documentation, and Information Networking(Paldin): Participatory Lifelong Learning and Information and Communication Technologies 117–38.

Perso, Thelma. 2006. “Teachers of Mathematics or Numeracy?” Australian Mathematics Teacher 62(2).

Purpura, David J., Laura E. Hume, Darcey M. Sims, and Christopher J. Lonigan. 2011. “Early Literacy and Early Numeracy: The Value of Including Early Literacy Skills in the Prediction of Numeracy Development.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 4(1):145–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.004.

Rushton, Sheryl J. 2018. “Teaching and Learning Mathematics through Error Analysis.” Fields Mathematics Education Journal 3(1):14–26. doi: 10.1186/s40928-018-0009-y.

Santrock, John W. 2016. Educational Psychology. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill Education.

Segers, Eliane, Tijs Kleemans, and Ludo Verhoeven. 2015. “Role of Parent Literacy and Numeracy Expectations and Activities in Predicting Early Numeracy Skills.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning 7(3):1–18. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2015.1016819.

Simonović, Nikola. 2021. “Teachers’ Key Competencies for Innovative Teaching.” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education 9(3):331–45. doi: 10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-331-345.

Siregar, D. N. 2016. “Emphasizing Morals, Values, Ethics, and Character Education in Science Education and Science Teaching.” The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences (MOJES) 5(2):44–66.

Sullivan, Peter, Robyn Zevenbergen, and Judith Mousley. 2003. “The Contexts of Mathematics Tasks and the Context of the Classroom: Are We Including All Students?” Mathematics Education Research Journal 15(2):107–21. doi: 10.1007/BF03217373.

Tariq, Vicki. 2014. “Numeracy, Mathematical Literacy and the Life Sciences.” MSOR Connections 4(2):25–29. doi: 10.11120/msor.2004.04020025.

Uysal, H. 2012. “Evaluation of an In-Service Training Program for Primary-School Language Teachers in Turkey.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37(7):14–29. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4.

Weng, Xiaojing, Zhihao Cui, Oi-Lam Ng, Morris S. Y. Jong, and Thomas K. F. Chiu. 2022. “Characterizing Students’ 4C Skills Development During Problem-Based Digital Making.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 31(3):372–85. doi: 10.1007/s10956-022-09961-4.

Wright, Robert J. 2013. “Assessing Early Numeracy: Significance, Trends, Nomenclature, Context, Key Topics, Learning Framework and Assessment Tasks.” South African Journal of Childhood Education 3(2):20–34. doi: 10.4102/sajce.v3i2.38.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v8i5.26475