Mathematical Literacy of Junior High School Students in Solving Problems PISA in Minang Context

Fathur Rahmi; Iltavia Iltavia; Ramzil Huda Zarista

doi:10.31764/jtam.v6i4.10221

Mathematical Literacy of Junior High School Students in Solving Problems PISA in Minang Context

Fathur Rahmi, Iltavia Iltavia, Ramzil Huda Zarista

Abstract

Often the use of repeated questions and answers is given by the teacher so that they cannot analyze students' mathematical literacy abilities. There needs to be a solution to the PISA problem so that student competencies can be seen clearly. The teacher should analyze this so that it does not happen continuously so that a way can be found to overcome it. The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical literacy of junior high school students when working on PISA questions in the Minang context. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The results of the PISA test and interviews became the data in this study. To find out more detailed data, the authors took the research subjects based on the results of the PISA test later and categorized the subjects into the highest, medium and lowest. In this study, researchers used indicators of mathematical literacy level according to PISA. The results of this study indicate that in formulating the situation mathematically is 75%, reasoning 33.05% and solving problems 14.44%. That is, on average, students are only able to answer problems only up to level 2 PISA, that the ability to formulate situations mathematically.

Keywords

Mathematical Literacy; PISA problems minang context.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Bansilal, S & Debba, R. (2013). Exploring The Role of Contextual Attributes in a Mathematical Literacy Assessment Task. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3), 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740747

Botha, H & Putten, S., V. (2018). How Mathematical Literacy Teachers Facilitate Mathematisation in Modelling Situations. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22 (1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1437337

Bybee, R & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives From PISA 2006 Science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518644

Edo, S., I, Hartono, Y & Putri, R., I., I. (2013). Investigating Secondary School Students’ Difficulties in Modeling Problems PISA-Model Level 5 And 6. IndoMS. J.M.E, 4(1), 41–58.

Fahmy, A. F. R., Wardono, & Masrukan. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran RME Berbantuan Geogebra. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 559–567.

Hebel, F., L, Tiberghien, A, Montpied, A & Fontanieu, V. (2017). Sources of Difficulty in Assessment: Example of PISA Science Items. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 468–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1294784

Hebel, F., L, Tiberghien, A, Montpied, A & Fontanieu, V. (2019). Teacher Prediction of Student Difficulties While Solving A Science Inquiry Task: Example of PISA Science Items. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1517–1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879223

Johar., R. (2012). Domain Soal PISA untuk Literasi Matematika. Jurnal Peluang, 1(1), 30–41.

Julie, C. (2013). Teachers’ preferred contexts for Mathematical Literacy as possible initiators for Mathematics for Action. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2006.10740604

Lam, T., Y., P & Lau, K., C. (2014). Examining Factors Affecting Science Achievement of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2463–2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879223

Maryanti, E. (2012). Peningkatan Literasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Metacognitive Guidance. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.

Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan SDM. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika.

Ngcobo, M & Julie, C. (2013). Contexts Preferred for Use in Mathematics by Swaziland High Performing Public Schools’ Junior Secondary Learners. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(3, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740746

OECD. (2009). Learning Mathematics for Life A View Perspective From PISA. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Publications.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.

Rahmi, F., Iltavia, & Zarista, R. H. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berorientasi Matematika Realistik untuk Membangun Pemahaman Relasional pada Materi Peluang. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2869–2877.

Rahmi, F., Sampoerno, P. D., & Ambarwati, L. (2020). Probability Learning Trajectory: Students’ Emerging Relational Understanding of Probability Through Ratio. The 7th South East Asia Design Research International Conference (SEADRIC 2019), IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1470 (2020) 012067. https://doi.org/doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012067

Rizki, L.M., dan Priatna, N. (2018). Mathematical Literacy as the 21st Century Skill. Journal of Physics : Conference Series, 1(042088), 1–5.

Sáenz, C. (2009). The Role of Contextual, Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Activating Mathematical Competencies (PISA). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9167-8

Sari, R. H. N. (2015). Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana? Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Uny.

Setiawan, H., Dafik, & Lestari, N., D. ,. S. (2014). Soal Matematika dalam PISA Kaitannya dengan Literasi Matematika dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 244–251.

Stacey, K. (2014). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126.

Sun, L, Bradleya, K., D & Akersb, K. (2014). A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating Factors Impacting Science Achievement for Secondary School Students: PISA Hong Kong Sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107–2125. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708063

Langrall, W., C. (2010). Yes, Another Handbook and Why You Might Want to Read This One. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.2.0210

Wardhani, S. & R. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika.

Wati, M., Sugiyanti, & Muhtarom. (n.d.). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 6 Semarang. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 97–106.

Weber, K, Mejía-Ramos, J., P & Volpe, T. (2020). The Relationship Between Proof and Certainty in Mathematical Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0034

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in Solving Context-based PISA Mathematics Tasks: An Analysis of Students’ Errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584.

Zhu, Y. (2021). Reading Matters More than Mathematics in Science Learning: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Student Achievement in Reading, Mathematics and Science. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2007552

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i4.10221