Development of Differentiate Student Worksheets: an  Efforts to Improve Student Argumentation Ability

Zuhadur Ra'is Ariyono Putra; Rustanto Rahardi; Sisworo Sisworo

doi:10.31764/jtam.v8i1.17426

Development of Differentiate Student Worksheets: an Efforts to Improve Student Argumentation Ability

Zuhadur Ra'is Ariyono Putra, Rustanto Rahardi, Sisworo Sisworo

Abstract

Online learning experiences have been associated with reduced learning outcomes and limited student engagement in argumentation. To address this issue, the focus on teaching materials becomes crucial, especially in promoting differentiated learning to accommodate pandemic-induced learning losses. A prime candidate for enhancing argumentation skills is the study of quadrilaterals within mathematics. Mastering the quadrilateral concept and its argumentative structure is pivotal for students. Hence, the creation of student worksheets employing differentiated learning principles is imperative. This research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective quadrilateral worksheets with a focus on adversity quotient differentiation. The ADDIE model guides the development process through Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation stages. Rigorous evaluation, including expert validation (83.8% very valid), field trials (91% very practical), and N-Gain score analysis (0.73, indicating effectiveness), underscores the quality of the developed worksheets. In conclusion, the adversity quotient differentiated quadrilateral worksheets has been successfully crafted to enhance students' argumentation skills. It is deemed valid, practical, and effective in improving learning outcomes. This initiative holds potential for addressing the challenges posed by online learning and contributes to students' academic development.

Keywords

Adversity Quotient; Differentiated; Argumentation Ability; Worksheets.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Agustiningsih, A., Ngatijo, N., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2021). The effectiveness of modified flip-based argumentation learning in improving students’ argumentation skills about hydrocarbon. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29930

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran (2nd ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya. http://library.fip.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=7414

Albano, G., & Iacono, U. Dello. (2019). A scaffolding toolkit to foster argumentation and proofs in mathematics : some case studies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0134-5

Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68–72. https://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf

Amalia, I. F. N., Roesminingsih, M. V., & Yani, M. T. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD Interaktif Berbasis Liveworksheet untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Sekolah Dasar. 6(5), 8154–8162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3762

Aprima, D., & Sari, S. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Pada Pelajaran Matematika SD. Cendikia : Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v13i1.2960

Dian Anggraeni, R., & Kustijono, R. (2013). Pengembangan Media Animasi Fisika Pada Materi Cahaya Dengan Aplikasi Flash Berbasis Android. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v3n1.p11-18

Farida, N., Hasanudin, H., & Suryadinata, N. (2019). Problem Based Learning (Pbl) – Qr-Code Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1894

Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Online di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v2i2.659

Grigorieva, E. (2013). Methods of Solving Complex Geometry Problems. Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00705-2

Herwina, W. (2021). Optimalisasi Kebutuhan Murid Dan Hasil Belajar Dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 35(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.352.10

Hewi, L., & Asnawati, L. (2020). Strategi Pendidik Anak Usia Dini Era Covid-19 dalam Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berfikir Logis. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.530

Hilyana, F. S. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Lks Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Bekerjasama Dan Memecahkan Masalah Siswa. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v2i1.654

Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, P., As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Argument mapping to improve student’s mathematical argumentation skills. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1208–1212. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-48

Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.259

Kristianti, T. P., Ramli, M., & Ariyanto, J. (2018). Improving the argumentative skills of high school students through teacher’s questioning techniques and argumentative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012012

Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a Malaysian university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1022913

Maarif, S., Wahyudin, W., & Alyani, F. (2020). Kemampuan Mengkonstruksi Bukti Geometri Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Perkuliahan Geometri. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2012

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Alfabeta. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=DCjKEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Mulyatiningsih,+E.+(2014).+Metode+Penelitian+Terapan+Bidang+Pendidikan+(3rd+ed.).+Alfabeta.&ots=z1sPMyu-WJ&sig=8Dl8ji6G2AbZlMfSj9D5H60Q-yw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Nurpratiwi, T. L., & Setianingsih, R. (2021). Students’ Thinking Processes In Solving Open-Ended Problems Using Online Learning Taking Into Account The Mathematical Ability. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v4i1.5288

Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. MISYKAT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran, Hadist, Syari’ah Dan Tarbiyah, 3(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.33511/misykat.v3n1.171

Putra, Z. R. A., & Oktaviane, D. A. K. (2022). Analisis Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Eksponensial Berdasarkan Tingkat Adversity Quotient Siswa. MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v5i1

Putra, Z. R. A., Pratama, C. E., & Pramudito, M. S. P. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Matematika Berdiferensiasi Berbasis Understanding by Design ( UbD ). Postulat: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30587/postulat.v4i1.5695

Putra, Z. R. A., Rahardi, R., Sisworo, S., & Permadi, H. (2023). Profile of Students’ Argumentation Ability Based On Adversity Quotient In Statistical Problem. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v7i1.2330

Putra, Z. R. A., & Wintarti, A. (2020). Development Student’s Worksheets Solid Curved Surface Based On Augmented Reality. Majamath: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v4i1.896

Rahayu, D., & Budiyono. (2018). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Bangun Datar. Jpgsd, 6(3), 249–259. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/254876-pengaruh-metode-permainan-sirkuit-pintar-8f6b2278.pdf

Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2022). Online Learning Application In Physics For School Course To Enhance Digital Literacy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1049

Sadieda, L. U. (2019). Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.24038

Safi’i, A., Muttaqin, I., Sukino, Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa’i, M. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12), e08510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510

Sally, R., & Renzulli, J. (2018). The Five Dimensions of Differentiation. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1296874

Sembiring, B. O., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2022). Development of Interactive Student’s Worksheets to Improve Mathematical HOTS of Tenth Grade Students in Trigonometry Topic. Alphamath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(November), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i2.14363

Sharifah, R., & Faaizah, S. (2015). The Development of Online Project Based Collaborative Learning using ADDIE Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1803–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.392

Siska, S., Yunita, Y., & Ubaidillah, M. (2022). Application of the Socio Scientific Issue Strategy to Improve Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills on The Concept of the Respiration System in Class XI Mipa SMAN 1 Suranenggala. OPSearch: American Journal of Open Research, 1(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v1i1.4

Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.77

Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. http://repository.unjani.ac.id/repository/bb3c79a5b289950bb62ef247eb2d473a.pdf

Sukmaningrum, R., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Profile of student’s algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3349

Sulistyani, N. H. D., Jamzuri, & Rahardjo, D. T. (2013). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Antara Menggunakan Media Pocket Book Dan Tanpa Pocket Book Pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Melingkar Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 164–172. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pfisika/article/view/1784

Sunardi, S., & Yudianto, E. (2016). Antisipasi Siswa Level Analisis Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v5i2.4776

Tama, N. B., Probosari, R. M., & Widoretno, S. (2016). Project Based Learning to Improve Written Argumentation Skill of Tenth Graders. Bioedukasi, 9(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i2.4224

Umbaryati, U. (2016). Pentingnya LKPD pada Pendekatan Scientific Pembelajaran Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i3.56958

Wilkinson, I., Reznitskaya, A., & D’Agostino, J. (2023). Professional development in classroom discussion to improve argumentation: Teacher and student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101732

Wulandari, W., Darmawijoyo, D., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pemodelan Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 15 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.10.1.3292.114-126

Yanti, D. N., Ikhsan, J., & Wiyarsi, A. (2023). Guided Inquiry Learning: How to Improve Students’ Argumentation Abilities in Science Learning? Journal of Education Technology, 7(2), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.63193

Zhen, B., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Mathematics Majors’ Perceptions of the Admissibility of Graphical Inferences in Proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0010-1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.17426