Profile of Cybernetic Thinking of Students in Mathematical Problem Solving Based on Serialist and Holist Thinking Style

Aning Wida Yanti; Kusaeri Kusaeri; Mia Kustianingsih

doi:10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2403

Profile of Cybernetic Thinking of Students in Mathematical Problem Solving Based on Serialist and Holist Thinking Style

Aning Wida Yanti, Kusaeri Kusaeri, Mia Kustianingsih

Abstract

This research aim to describe the profile of cybernetic thinking of students in solving algebra problems. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach using questionnaires, written tests, and interview guidelines. Intake of subjects who have Serialist and Holist thinking styles have done using purposive sampling. The results showed students who have the Serialist thinking style at the time of the Sensory Register's attention and good perception so that information stored in Short Term Memory. Retrieval done well even when rehearsal has difficulty because of forgetting certain concepts, but information has been stored well in Long Term Memory. The encoding done well. While students who have Holist style of thinking lack attention and perceptions are not structured so that information is not stored correctly in Short Term Memory. So that retrieval can not be done correctly. Therefore during rehearsal, they have difficulty in applying the settlement method because the information is not stored correctly in Long Term Memory.

Keywords

Cybernetic thinking; Mathematical problem; Serialist thinking styles; Holist thinking styles.

Full Text:

Download [PDF]

References

Abdullah. (2018). Pendekatan Dan Model Pembelajaran Yang Mengaktifkan Siswa. EDURELIGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v1i2.45

Amamah, S., Sa’dijah, C., & Sudirman. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Field Dependen dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 237–245.

Annajmi, A. (2018). Kontribusi Disposisi Matematis terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 3 Tambusai. EDUMATICA | Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(01), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v8i01.4730

Arvyaty, Jazuli, L. O. A., Rosdiana, Hasnawati, Y. E. Y. K., & Tiya, K. (2015). Development of Learning Devices of Cybernetic Cooperative in Discussing the Simplex Method in Mathematics Education Students. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 589–598.

Bednar, P., & Welch, C. E. (2014). Applying cybernetic thinking to becoming a learning organization. Kybernetes, 43(9/10), 1319–1329.

Charters, E. (2003). The Use of Think-aloud Methods in Qualitative Research An Introduction to Think-aloud Methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38

Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2011). Mining learning preferences in web-based instruction: Holists vs. Serialists. Educational Technology and Society, 14(4), 266–277.

Gagné, R. M. (1975). Essentials of learning for instruction. New York : Dryden/Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Indah, S. T., Subanji, & Dwiyana. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Tunanetra dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Teori Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1, 1265–1278. https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i7.6528

Ingleby, E. (2012). Research methods in education. Professional Development in Education, 38(3), 507–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

Irianti, N. P., Subanji, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Quitter dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah SPLDV Berdasarkan Langkah-langkah Polya. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i2.582

Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student Difficulties in Mathematizing Word Problems in Algebra. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a

Khairani, M. (2017). Psikologi Belajar. Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressindo.

Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139–151.

Kusaeri, K. (2012). Menggunakan Model DINA Dalam Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Untuk Mendeteksi Salah Konsepsi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i1.1118

Lailiyah, S., Nusantara, T., Sa’dijah, C., Irawan, E. B., Kusaeri, & Asyhar, A. H. (2018). Structuring students’ analogical reasoning in solving algebra problem. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1), 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012029

Landa, L. N. (1976). Instructional regulation and control: Cybernetics, algorithmization, and heuristics in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.

Lestari, D., Testiana, G., & Agustiani, R. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika RAFA, 4(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.19109/jpmrafa.v4i1.3766

Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1

Ma’Rufi, Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). The analysis of mathematics teachers’ learning on algebra function limit material based on teaching experience difference. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4994459

Nazir, M. (2009). Metode Penelitian. Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia.

Ngilawajan, D. A. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMA dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Materi Turunan Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent dan Field Dependent. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v2i1.48

Noor, J. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi & Karya Ilmiah. Jakarta :Prenada Media.

Pane, A., & Darwis Dasopang, M. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945

Pask, G. (1976). Styles and Strategies of Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02305.x

Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1973). Caste: A system for exhibiting learning strategies and regulating uncertainties. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 5(1), 17–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(73)80008-2

Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (2015). Problem-solving Strategies In Mathematics: From Common Approaches To Exemplary Strategies. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2016). Exploration of mathematics problem solving process based on the thinking level of students in junior high school. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 7278–7285. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.240664

Rehalat, A. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Pemrosesan Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 23(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v23i2.1625

Saul, M. (2008). Algebra: The mathematics and the pedagogy. In C.E. Greenes & R. Rubenstein (Eds), Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematic. Reston, VA: The National Council of Theachers Mathematics, Inc.

Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(1), 60–68.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (mixed Methods). In Bandung :Alfabet.

Supriadi, D., Mardiyana., & Subanti, S. (2015). Analisis Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah Polya Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Al Azhar Syifa Budi Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 204–214.

Suyono, H. (2011). Belajar dan pembelajaran Teori dan konsep Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ulya, H., Kartono, & Retnoningsih, A. (2014). Analysis of Mathematics Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students Viewed From Students’ Cognitive Style. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2014 (ICMSE 2014) M.

Xiong, A., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). Information Processing: The Language and Analytical Tools for Cognitive Psychology in the Information Age. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01270

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i2.2403