Mathematical Semiotics in Primary Learning: Helping Prospective Teachers Understand Mathematical Representations

Ratni Purwasih; Edi Irawan; Sona Minasyan

doi:10.31764/jtam.v9i3.30835

Mathematical Semiotics in Primary Learning: Helping Prospective Teachers Understand Mathematical Representations

Ratni Purwasih, Edi Irawan, Sona Minasyan

Abstract

Mathematics learning in elementary schools is often faced with the challenge of bridging abstract concepts with participants' concrete experiences. One of the reasons is the difficulty in understanding and using mathematical signs and symbols appropriately. Semiotic representation of mathematics, which involves symbols, diagrams and notations as visual and conceptual aids, is an important approach in overcoming these challenges. This study aims to explore the ability of prospective elementary school teachers to understand and use semiotic representations of mathematics, especially in the context of number patterns. A qualitative approach with a hermeneutic phenomenological design was chosen to understand prospective teachers' experiences, views, and thought processes in interpreting and using mathematical symbols. The researcher used written tests and semi-structured interviews as data collection techniques to explore the semiotic representations used in mathematical problem solving. The participants were grouped based on the results of the initial ability test, and six of them were selected as research subjects. Data analysis used the Interpretive Phenomenology Analysis (IPA) method with the help of NVivo 14 Plus software, which allows researchers to systematically manage and analyze qualitative data. The results of this study are expected to provide insight into prospective teachers' understanding of symbolic representation in mathematics learning and the challenges they face, which can be the basis for designing more effective learning strategies in the context of mathematics education in primary schools. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were obtained through observation and analysis of problem solving activities involving symbolic and visual representations. The results of the study are expected to provide insight into the importance of semiotic training in prospective teacher education, so that they are able to convey mathematical concepts meaningfully and contextually.

Keywords

Mathematical semiotics; Primary learning; Prospective teacher; Representation.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Arzarello, F., & Sabena, C. (2011). Semiotic and theoretic control in argumentation and proof activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9280-3

Atkins, H., Moore, D., Simon, S., & Dave, H. (2001). Learning Style Theory and Computer Mediated Communication. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED466131

Azrai, E. P., Ernawati, E., & Sulistianingrum, G. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar David Kolb (Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, Accommodator) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.10-1.2

Bessoondyal, H. (2017). Meta-Cognitive Strategies in Problem Solving for Children with Learning Difficulties in Mathematics at the Primary Level. International Journal of Special Education, 32(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1236993.pdf

Biber, Ç., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eight grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9387

Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., & Schappelle, B. P. (2014). Using order to reason about negative numbers: The case of Violet. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9519-x

Bofferding, L. (2014). Negative Integer Understanding: Characterizing First Graders’ Mental Models. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(2), 194–245. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.2.0194

Bofferding, L., & Wessman-Enzinger, N. (2017). Subtraction involving negative numbers: Connecting to whole number reasoning. Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1–3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1396

Borg, G. (2014). Applying Educational Research: How to Read, Do, and Use Research to Solve Problems of Practice. In lNew York and london. Longman publishing Inc.

Claudia, L. F., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Semiotic Analysis of Mathematics Problems-Solving: Configure Mathematical Objects Viewed from High Mathematical Disposition. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012048

Durrance, S. (2019). Early Math Matters: Factoring in Teacher Knowledge and Practice. Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), June. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED605274

Edwards-Jones, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2013.866724

Eichhorn, M. S., Perry, L. E., & Brombacher, A. (2018). Students’ early grade understanding of the equal sign and non-standard equations in Jordan and India. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.432520

Fauzi, I., & Arisetyawan, A. (2020). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa pada Materi Geometri Di Sekolah Dasar. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 11(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v11i1.20726

Furqon, ul, Siswanah, E., & Falasifa Tsani, D. (2021). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas IX berdasarkan Gaya Belajar menurut David Kolb. EDUMATICA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 11(01):12-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i01.11438

Hidayah, I. N., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, & Sudirman. (2020). Charakteristics Of Students’ Abductive Reasoning In Solving Algebra Problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.11.3.11869.347-362

Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2006). What is a “semiotic perspective”, and what could it be? Some comments on the contributions to this special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-1456-5

Hu, C. (2011). Computational thinking - What it might mean and what we might do about it. ITiCSE’11 - Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999747.1999811

Hundeland, P. S., Calsen, M., & Erjord, I. (2014). Children’s Engagement with Mathematics in Kindergarten Mediated by the Use of Digital Tools. Early Mathematics Learning, 207–221. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4678-1, 201–221.

John W. Creswell. (2017). John W, Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 4(2), 205–207. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v4i2.1313

Khalid, M., & Embong, Z. (2020). Sources and Possible Causes of Errors and Misconceptions in Operations of Integers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6265

Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: Factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217440

Liebe, C., & Camp, T. (2019). An examination of abstraction in K-12 computer science education. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364526

Maharani, A. (2020). Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Euclid, 7(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v7i2.3364

Mgova, Z. (2018). Computational Thinking Skills in Education Curriculum.

Miller, J. (2015). Young Indigenous Students ’ Engagement with Growing Pattern Tasks : A Semiotic Perspective. Proceeding of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematic Education Reseacrh Group of Australasia, 421–428. https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8q4ww/young-indigenous-students-engagement-with-growing-pattern-tasks-a-semiotic-perspective

Mudaly, V. (2014). A visualisation-based semiotic analysis of learners’ conceptual understanding of graphical functional relationships. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.889789

Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS , 2. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/183

Ostler, E. (2011). Semiotics, Teaching adaptive and strategic reasoning through formula derivation: Beyond formal. International Journal of Mathematics Science Education. 4(2), 16–24. https://Docplayer.Net/40341983-Teachiing-Adaptive-and-Strategic-Reasoning-through-Formula- Derivation-beyond-Formal-Semiotics.Html

Palayukan, H. (2022). Semiotics in Integers : How Can the Semiosis Connections Occur in Problem Solving ? Webology, 19(2), 98–111. https://webology.org/issue.php?volume=19&issue=2

Pinnock, E. (2021). Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5-to 12-year-olds: the global evolution of and emerging field of research and practice. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1725613

Pramesti, G. (2017). Analisis korespondensi motivasi mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i1.250

Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Past, Present and Future, 205–235. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241301299_Research_on_visualization_in_learning_and_teaching_mathematics

Purwasih, R., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Irawan, E. (2023). Semiotic Perspective in Mathematics Problem-solving. Journal of Didactic Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jds.v1i1.59022

Purwasih, R., Turmudi, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Ishartono, N. (2024). Computational thinking on concept pattern number: A study learning style Kolb. Jurnal Elemen, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.23056

Quinnell, L., & Carter, M. L. (2012). Greek or not: The use of symbols and abbreviations in mathematics. Autralian Mathematics Teacher, 68(2), 34–41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ974986&utm_source=chatgpt.com

Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2019). Semiotics in Mathematics Education. In Semiotics in Mathematics Education (Issue March). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087905972

Rigelman, N. R. (2020). Fostering Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving: The Teacher’s Role. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.5951/tcm.13.6.0308

Rigelman, N. R., & Rhodes, I. by: S. (2023). “Fostering Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving: The Teacher’s Role.” Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 116(1). https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2022.0250

Rivera, F. D. (2010). Visual templates in pattern generalization activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9222-0

Rosikhoh, D., & Abdussakir, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Pola Bilangan melalui Permainan Tradisional Nasi Goreng Kecap. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2020.3.1.43-54

Santi, G. (2011). Objectification and semiotic function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9296-8

Schindler, M., Hußmann, S., Nilsson, P., & Bakker, A. (2017). Sixth-grade students’ reasoning on the order relation of integers as influenced by prior experience: an inferentialist analysis. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(4), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0202-x

Smith, K. L., & Rayfield, J. (2017). Student Teaching Changed Me: A Look at Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Scores Before and After the Student Teaching Experience. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.01102

Soraya, K., Martasari, R., & Nurhasanah, S. A. (2020). Profil Gaya Belajar (David Kolb) di SMA Swasta Tasikmalaya dalam Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Bioedusiana: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.34289/bioed.v5i1.1198

Suryaningrum, C. W., & Agustina, Lady. (2021). REPRESENTASI PADA PENALARAN SEMIOTIK. Jurnal Gammath, 63–72. https://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/5660

Suryaningrum, C. W., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., & Susanto, H. (2019). Semiotic reasoning in solving plane figure area. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1C2), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.b1141.0782s419

Swafford, J. O., & Langrall, C. W. (2000). Grade 6 students’ preinstructional use of equations to describe and represent problem situations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/749821

Syahputra, E. (2018). Pembelajaran Abad 21 Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia. Sinastekmapan, 1(November 2018), 1276–1283. https://doi.org/10.62386/jised.v2i4.104

Torigoe, E. T., & Gladding, G. E. (2011). Connecting symbolic difficulties with failure in physics. American Journal of Physics, 79(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3487941

Ünal, Ş., & Çil, O. (2023). Primary School Teachers’ Experiences on The Process of Teaching Mathematics with The Digital Storytelling Method. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.29329/tayjournal.2023.610.10

Vale, I., & Barbosa, A. (2015). Mathematics Creativity in Elementary Teacher Training. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 10(July), 101–109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331638425_PEMBELAJARAN_ABAD_21_DAN_PENERAPANNYA_DI_INDONESIAhttps://etenjournal.com/2020/02/08/mathematics-creativity-in-elementary-teacher-training/

Wicaksono, A. B., Chasanah, A. N., & Sukoco, H. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berbasis Budaya Ditinjau Dari Gender Dan Gaya Belajar. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3256

Widjaja, W., Stacey, K., & Steinle, V. (2011). Locating negative decimals on the number line: Insights into the thinking of pre-service primary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.11.004

Winarti, D., Jamiah, Y., & Suratman, D. (2017). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar pada Materi Pecahan di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 6(6). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/20462

Zhang, D., & Rivera, F. D. (2021). Predetermined accommodations with a standardized testing protocol: Examining two accommodation supports for developing fraction thinking in students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62(February), 100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100861

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v9i3.30835