An Analysis of Cognitive Levels in Sociology Assessment Instruments for Senior High School: A Teacher Document Study

Dwi Agustina; Aris Martiana; Novita Sari

doi:10.31764/paedagoria.v17i2.37510

An Analysis of Cognitive Levels in Sociology Assessment Instruments for Senior High School: A Teacher Document Study

Dwi Agustina, Aris Martiana, Novita Sari

Abstract

Studies that specifically analyze the distribution of cognitive levels in sociology assessment instruments remain limited. This highlights the importance of research that maps the alignment of assessment instruments developed by teachers with the competency standards outlined in the curriculum. Therefore, this study aims to map the distribution of cognitive levels in senior high school sociology assessment instruments, identify emerging content trends, and analyze the relationships among the cognitive levels represented. The study employed a qualitative method with a content analysis approach. Data were collected through document analysis of 11 assessment instruments developed by 11 senior high school sociology teachers in Sleman Regency, which included both objective and essay items. The analysis process was supported by ATLAS.ti software, and the results were presented in the form of distribution tables, Sankey diagrams, and network views. The findings indicate that the test items were dominated by the C4 (analysis) level, with 99 items, suggesting a shift in assessment focus from lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) to higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), although items at the C5 level were still limited, and the C6 level had not yet been accommodated. The content trends were dominated by contextual themes such as social problems, social structure, social interaction, and social integration, which are consistent with the intended learning competencies of sociology. The analysis of inter-level cognitive relationships revealed a supportive hierarchy: C1 to C2 (is a part of), C2 to C3 (is cause of), C3 to C4 (is cause of), C4 to C5 (is associated with), and C5 to C6 (is associated with). The implications of this study can be used to develop assessment items that promote higher-order thinking skills.

Keywords

Assessment; Cognitive Level; Sociology; Content Analysis; Teacher Instrument.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulrahman, S. A. (2023). The Effects of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Enriched Instruction on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance in an Academic Writing Course. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(3), 290–305.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Dahlan, D. (2021). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Assessment for High School Economic Subject. Journal of Economic Education, 10(2), 134–141.

Dallasheh, W. (2024). Content Analysis of the EFL Textbook Units According to Bloom’s Taxonomy: Between Theory and Practice. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 24(4), 304–326.

Darakay, J., & Murwani, P. (2023). The Social Structure of the Aru People from a Sociocultural Perspective in the Aru Islands Regency. Komunitas: Jurnal Ilmu Sosiologi, 4(2), 27–33.

Fajar, R., & Junaidi, J. (2022). Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) in the Odd Semester Final Examination for Grade XII High School Sociology. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 23–34.

Hajaroh, M. (2021). Higher-Order Thinking Skills as a Foundation for the Development of Educational Assessment and Evaluation. FOUNDASIA, 12(2), 59–74.

Handayani, N., Suranto, A., Zamroni, Imanita, M., Setiawan, J., & Fadli, M. R. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in social studies learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(2), 923–933.

Hayya, L. A., & Dharin, A. (2023). The Role of Bloom’s Taxonomy Cognitive Domain in Developing Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. J-PGMI: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 6(1), 73–83.

Huseng, A. M., Auliyauddin, S., & Nursalam, N. (2025). Educational Taxonomy: Dimensions of Knowledge, Attitude, and Skills. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(9), 107–116.

Indriyani, I. E., Syaharuddin, & Jumriani. (2021). Social Interaction Contents on Social Studies Learning to Improve Social Skills. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2(2), 93–102.

Kartowagiran, B., Hamdi, S., Istiyono, E., Ayub, A. F. M., & Dewanti, S. S. (2021). Integrating the 21st Century Character Values for Elementary School Students. İlköğretim Online, 20(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.07

Kasanah, M., & Pratama, A. P. (2024). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Learning Outcomes Assessment. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset, 2(2), 146–162.

Kencana, N. P., Purwati, O., & Munir, A. (2022). The alignment of assessment tasks with teaching objectives and activities based on Bloom’s taxonomy: Case study. ELT Worldwide, 9(1), 44–55.

Listiani, W., & Rachmawati, R. (2022). Transformation of Bloom’s Taxonomy in HOTS-Based Learning Evaluation. JURNAL JENDELA PENDIDIKAN, 2(3), 397–402.

Liu, Q., Wald, N., Daskon, C., & Harland, T. (2024). Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for higher-order cognition: Perspectives of university teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(4), 802–814.

Mardiani, & Sylvia, I. (2019). Development of Three-Level Objective Diagnostic Tests to Detect Misconceptions in Sociological Characteristics. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 69–79.

Marta, M. A., Purnomo, D., & Gusmameli. (2024). The Concept of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Instructional Design. Lencana: Jurnal Inovasi Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 227–246.

McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction . Pearson.

Momen, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Hassan, A. M. (2022). Importance and Implications of Theory of Bloom’s Taxonomy in Different Fields of Education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems, 515–525.

Muhayimana, T., Kwizera, L., & Nyirahabimana, M. R. (2022). Using Bloom’s taxonomy to evaluate the cognitive levels of Primary Leaving English C questions in Rwandan schools. Curriculum Perspectives, 42(1), 51–63.

Nurhaliza, A., & Mustopa, A. (2023). Analysis of Cognitive Levels of Exam Questions Based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in Social Studies. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 33(2), 145–156.

Palijama, F. (2022). The Development of Social Theory and Theoretical Approaches to Addressing Social Problems in Indonesia. HIPOTESA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 16(2), 12–20.

Pratiwi, P. H., Hidayah, N., & Agustina, D. (2024). Indonesiansociography Analysis Of Themes And The Implications For Strengthening High School Sociology Learning In Indonesia. Sociologia, Problemas E Práticas, 104, 43–67.

Pratiwi, P. H., Hidayah, N., & Martiana, A. (2017). Developing Hots Modules for Sociology Learning Assessment Course. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 201–209.

Putri, R. E., Pertiwi, A. I., Sunarya, A. E., Yuendi, E. C., Afiyah, W., & Putri, H. E. (2025). Cognitive Level Analysis of Multiple Choice Questions for the UTS Science Subject for Grade IV Elementary School Based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(12), 8228–8235.

Rachmawati. M, & Hidayati, Y. M. (2023). Analysis of Mid-semester Assessment in Cultivating Critical Thinking of Elementary School Students. ICOLAE ASSEHR, 757, 1290–1299.

Reski, P., & Sylvia, I. (2021). Design of Open-Ended Questions to Enhance Students’ Reasoning Skills in Sociology Learning at SMA N 1 Sungai Aur, West Pasaman Regency. Jurnal Sikola: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 147–161.

Rismaulhijjah, W. A. (2022). Item Analysis of Daily Test Questions Resulting from the Development of Teacher Materials on Human Movement Systems for Grade XI Science Students. Bioedu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 11(3), 643–661.

Riyanto, E. (2023). Authentic Assessment through a Contextual Approach. Prediksi: Profesi Pendidik Indonesia, 3(1), 15–28.

Saraswati, P. M. S., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2020). Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Solving HOTS Questions in Mathematics. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 257–269.

Suharno, Akhyar, M., Pambudi, N. A., Roemintoyo, Sukatiman, Habsya, C., & Cahyono, B. T. (2022). Testing Students’ Learning Readiness Based on Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Dan Kejuruan, 15(1), 62–69.

Ummaira, W. A., & Sylvia, I. (2025). Problem-Solving Ability in Sociology Learning (A Case Study of Grade XI IIS at SMA Negeri 2 Padang). Naradidik: Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 1–8.

Yusmilda, Budi, I. S., Zuhad, H., Basith, A., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2023). Development of HOTS-Based Assessment Instruments at the Elementary Education Level in the Society 5.0 Era. Al Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 429–442.

Yusnaldi, E., Hariro, A. Z. Z., Abdullah, B. M., Rahman, F. S., Ramadhani, R., & Melisa, W. (2024). The Influence of Social Interaction on the Social Studies Learning Process in Elementary Schools/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 2715–2721.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v17i2.37510