Inquiry Co-Operation Model: An Effort to Enhance Students’ Mathematical Literacy Proficiency

Putri Nur Malasari; Tatang Herman; Al Jupri

doi:10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1894

Inquiry Co-Operation Model: An Effort to Enhance Students’ Mathematical Literacy Proficiency

Putri Nur Malasari, Tatang Herman, Al Jupri

Abstract

The urgency and proficiency of students’ mathematical literacy in Bandung that have not been optimal are the basis of this study. The aim of this study is to explain the enhancement of students' mathematical literacy proficiency due to the implementation of the inquiry co-operation model (experimental class) and conventional learning (control class) in terms of basic mathematical proficiency. This study is a quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design, and the research subjects were seventy students of class VIII of Bandung that were selected through a purposive sampling technique. The research data was obtained through mathematical literacy tests of material in a polyhedron. The results of the data analysis showed that: (1) the enhancement in mathematical literacy proficiency of the experimental students class was better than the control studentsclass in terms of the basic mathematical proficiency (high and medium); (2) there is no significant difference in the increase of mathematical literacy proficiency in experimental students class in terms of the basic mathematical proficiency. It can be concluded that inquiry co-operation model espouses the enhancement of students' mathematical literacy proficiency.

Keywords

Basic Mathematical Proficiency; Inquiry Co-Operation Model; Mathematical Literacy; Mathematics Education.

Full Text:

Download [PDF]

References

AlrØ, H., & Skovsmose, O. (2004). Dialogue and Learning in Mathematics Education: Intention, Reflection, Critique. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Barrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review, 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.004

Bolstad, O. H. (2019). Teaching for mathematical literacy: School leaders ’ and a teachers ’ rationales. 7(3), 93–108.

Carey, S., Zaitchik, D., & Bascandziev, I. (2015). Theories of development: In dialog with Jean Piaget. Developmental Review, 38, 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2015.07.003

Cooper, J. L., & Robinson, P. (2014). Using Classroom Assessment and Cognitive Scaffolding to Enhance the Power of Small-Group Learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25, 149–161.

Creswell, J. . (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

De Lange, J. (2003). Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges. National Council on Education and the Disciplines, 75–89.

De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical Literacy for Living from OECD-PISA perspective. Tsukuba Journal of International Study in Mathematics, 25, 13–35.

Effendi, L. A. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. JurnalPenelitian Pendidikan, 2(13).

Fani, T., & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in Teacher Education: ZPTD and Self-Scaffolding. Journal Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1549–1554.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Unpublished.[Online] URL: Http://Www. Physics. Indiana. Edu/~ Sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain. Pdf, 16(7), 1073–1080.

Hasibuan, H., & Irwan, M. (2014). Penerapan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Lubuk Alung. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(3), 38–44.

Howell, J. B., & Saye, J. W. (2017). Integrating theory and practice: Factors shaping elementary teachers׳ interpretation of an inquiry model for teaching social studies. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2017.04.003

Hsu, Y. S., Wang, C., & YZhang, W. X. (2016). Supporting Technology-Enhanced Inquiry through Metacognitive and Cognitive Prompts: Sequential Analysis of Metacognitive Actions in Response to Mixed Prompts. Journal Computers in Human Behavior.

Lestari, & Yudhanegara. (2017). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Reflika Aditama.

Malasari, P. N., Herman, T., & Jupri, A. (2017). The Construction of Mathematical Literacy Problems for Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012071

Meltzer, D. . (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: a possible ìhidden variableî in diagnostic pretest scores.

Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A. M., & Lerkkanen, M. K. (2016). Scaffolding through Dialogic Teaching in Early School Classrooms. Journal Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 143–154.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. In CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en

OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Mathematics Framework.

OECD. (2016a). Assassement and Analytical framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2016b). PISA 2015 Result and Focus.

OECD. (2016c). PISA 2015 Result In Focus (Paris OECD). OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Mathematics Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-5-en

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 insights and interpretations. In OECD Publishing. OECD Publishing.

Oesterdiekhoff, G. W. (2016). Is a forgotten subject central to the future development of sciences? Jean Piaget on the interrelationship between ontogeny and history. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.098

Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put the Mathematics We Learn into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education, 41, 89–100.

Pappas, E., Pierrakos, O., & Nagel, R. (2013). Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to teach sustainability in multiple contexts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.039

Pujiastuti, H., Kusumah, Y. S., Sumarmo, U., & Dahlan, J. A. (2014). Inquiry Co-operation Model for Enhancing Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Problems Solving Ability. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 1(1), 51–60.

Purwatiningsi, S. (2014). Penerapan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Luas Permukaan dan Volume Balok. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 1(1).

Rahmi, E. F., Diana, S., & Wulan, A. R. (2020). The Implementation of Modified Free Inquiry Learning Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of 21st-Century Students in High School on Bryophyta Learning. 399(Icepp 2019), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.090

Santrock, J. W. (2014). Perkembangan Masa Hidup. Erlangga.

Shooshtari, Z. G., Oshtari, Z. G., & Mir, F. (2014). ZPD, Tutor; Peer Scaffolding: Sociocultural Theory in Writing Strategies Application. Journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1771–1776.

Stiles, W. B., & Caro, G. E. (2016). Exceeding the Therapeutic Zone of Proximal Development as a Clinical Error. Journal Psychotherapy, 3(53), 268.

Stoilescu, D. (2016). Aspects of Theories, Frameworks and Paradigms in Mathematics Education Research. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 140–154.

Takaya, K. (2015). Bruner’s Theory of Cognitive Development. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2, 880–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.23095-X

Wulandari, I. C., Turmudi, & Hasanah, A. (2015). Studi Cross-Sectional Tingkat KemampuanLiterasiMatematisSiswaSekolahMenengahPertama di Bandung BerdasarkanPengujianSoal Pisa. JurnalLingkarWidyaiswara, 3(2), 10–25.

Yang, X. (2012). What Constitutes Good Mathematics Teaching in Mainland China: Perspectives from Nine Junior Middle School Teachers. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(5), 77–96.

Zhang, H., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Linking Parental Scaffolding with Self-Regulated Learning in Chinese Kindergarten Children. Journal Learning and Instruction, 49, 121–130.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v4i1.1894