The Application of Delta Gamma Normal Value at Risk to Measure the Risk in the Call Option of Stock

Ayu Astuti, Evy Sulistianingsih, Shantika Martha, Wirda Andani

Abstract


Call options of stock have a nonlinear dependence on market risk factors, thus encouraging the development of a method capable of measuring the risk of call option of stock, namely the Delta Gamma Normal Value at Risk (DGN VaR) method. The DGN VaR method can provide a more accurate VaR estimate than Delta Normal VaR (DN VaR) because of the Delta and Gamma sensitivity measures in the formula. The DGN VaR method uses the second-order Taylor Polynomial approach to approximate the return of stock price underlying the call option. This research applies the DGN VaR method to analyze the risk of call options of Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR). Both companies operate in the technology sector and are among the top 100 largest software companies based on market capitalization for the analysis period September 21, 2022 to September 21, 2023. The analyzed options in this research consist of in-the-money and out-of-the-money options with several strike prices (K). For in-the-money options, the strike prices are $105, $110, and $115 for TEAM, and $150, $160, and $170 for MSTR, while for out-of-the-money options, the strike prices are $190, $195, and $200 for TEAM, and $330, $340, and $350 for MSTR with varying confidence levels of 80%, 90%, 95%, and 99%. Based on the results of the analysis, the DGN VaR for the analyzed in-the-money option has a greater value than the DGN VaR for the analyzed out-of-the-money option.

Keywords


Call-Option; Nonlinear; Black-Scholes.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Amin, F. A. M., Yahya, S. F., Ibrahim, S. A. S., & Kamari, M. S. M. (2018). Portfolio Risk Measurement Based on Value at Risk (VaR). AIP Conference Proceedings, 1974(1), 020012. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5041543

Ammann, M., & Reich, C. (2001). VaR for Nonlinear Financial Instruments Linear Approximation or Full Monte Carlo? Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 15(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-001-0306-9

Britten-Jones, M., & Schaefer, S. M. (1999). Non-Linear Value at Risk. Review of Finance, 2(2), 161–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009779322802

Castellacci, G., & Siclari, M. J. (2003). The Practice of Delta–Gamma VaR: Implementing the Quadratic Portfolio Model. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00782-8

Chan, R. H., Guo, Y. Z. Y., Lee, S. T., & Li, X. (2019). Financial Mathematics, Derivatives, and Structured Products. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3696-6

Chance, D. M., & Brooks, R. (2015). Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management. Cengage Learning.

Chen, H.-Y., Lee, C.-F., & Shih, W. (2010). Derivations and Applications of Greek Letters: Review and Integration. Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management, 491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_33

Chen, R., & Yu, L. (2013). A Novel Nonlinear Value-at-Risk Method for Modeling Risk of Option Portfolio with Multivariate Mixture of Normal Distributions. Economic Modelling, 35, 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.003

Cheong, C. W., Isa, Z., & Nor, A. H. S. M. (2011). Cross Market Value-at-Risk Evaluations in Emerging Markets. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9385. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.856

Cui, X., Zhu, S., Sun, X., & Li, D. (2013). Nonlinear Portfolio Selection Using Approximate Parametric Value-at-Risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(6), 2124–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.036

Date, P., & Bustreo, R. (2016). Measuring The Risk of a Non-Linear Portfolio with Fat-Tailed Risk Factors Through a Probability Conserving Transformation. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 27(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpu015

Devitasari, P., Di Asih, I. M., & Kartikasari, P. (2023). Pengaruh Konveksitas Terhadap Sensitivitas Harga Jual Dan Delta-Normal Value at Risk (Var) Portofolio Obligasi Pemerintah Menggunakan Durasi Eksponensial. Jurnal Gaussian, 11(4), 532–541. https://doi.org/10.14710/j.gauss.11.4.532-541

Di Asih, I. M., & Abdurakhman, A. (2021). Delta-Normal Value at Risk Using Exponential Duration with Convexity for Measuring Government Bond Risk. DLSU Business and Economics Review, 31, 72–80. https://dlsu-ber.com/

Dimitrova, M., Treapăt, L.-M., & Tulyakova, I. (2021). Value at Risk as A Tool for Economic-Managerial Decision-Making in The Process of Trading in The Financial Market. Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 15(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.26552/ems.2021.2.13-26

Dowd, K. (2007). Measuring Market Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Duffie, D., & Pan, J. (2001). Analytical Value at Risk with Jumps and Credit Risk. Finance and Stochastics, 5, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013531

Evers, C., & Rohde, J. (2014). Model Risk in Backtesting Risk Measures. Diskussionsbeitrag, 529. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/96672

Gumanti, T. A. (2011). Manajemen Investasi: Konsep, Teori, dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Higham, D. J. (2004). An Introduction to Financial Option Valuation: Mathematics, Stochastics and Computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800948

Hoga, Y., & Demetrescu, M. (2023). Monitoring Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Forecasts. Management Science, 69(5), 2954–2971. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4460

Hull, J., & White, A. (1987). The Pricing of Options on Assets with Stochastic Volatilities. The Journal of Finance, 42(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb02568.x

Iglesias, E. M. (2015). Value at Risk of The Main Stock Market Indexes in The European Union (2000–2012). Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.01.006

Jobayed, A. (2017). Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Value-at-Risk (VaR) Models on Nordic Market Indices. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33136.97284

Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Khindanova, I. N., & Rachev, S. T. (2019). Value at Risk: Recent Advances. Handbook of Analytic Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 801–858. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429123610-18

Lehar, A. (2000). Alternative Value-at-Risk Models for Options. Available at SSRN 248088. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.248088

Lu, S. (2022). Empirical Analysis of Value at Risk (VaR) of Stock Portfolio Based on Python. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Mathematical Statistics and Economic Analysis (MSEA 2022), 559–567. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-042-8_80

Mabitsela, L., Maré, E., & Kufakunesu, R. (2015). Quantification of VaR: A Note on VaR Valuation in The South African Equity Market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 8(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm8010103

Miftahurrohmah, B., Wulandari, C., & Dharmawan, Y. S. (2021). Investment Modelling Using Value at Risk Bayesian Mixture Modelling Approach and Backtesting to Assess Stock Risk. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 7(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.7.1.11-21

Mina, J., & Ulmer, A. (1999). Delta-Gamma Four Ways. RiskMetrics Group. http://www.riskmetrics.com

Naradh, K., Chinhamu, K., & Chifurira, R. (2021). Estimating the Value-at-Risk of JSE Indices and South African Exchange Rate with Generalized Pareto and Stable Distributions. Investment Manage Financ Innovations, 18, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(3).2021.14

Nieto, M. R., & Ruiz, E. (2016). Frontiers in VaR Forecasting and Backtesting. International Journal of Forecasting, 32(2), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.08.003

Ozun, A., & Cifter, A. (2007). Portfolio Value-at-Risk with Time-Varying Copula: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of Applied Science, 7, 1916-1923. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.1916.1923

Patra, B., & Padhi, P. (2015). Backtesting of Value at Risk Methodology: Analysis of Banking shares in India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 9(3), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801015583739

Rosadi, D. (2009). Diktat Kuliah Manajemen Risiko Kuantitatif. UGM: Yogyakarta.

Sarpong, P. K., Osei, J., & Amoako, S. (2018). Historical Simulation (HS) Method on Value-at-Risk & Its Approaches. Dama International Journal of Researchers, 3, 9–15. https://damaacademia.com/dasjr/

Sulistianingsih, E., Martha, S., Andani, W., Umiati, W., & Astuti, A. (n.d.). Application of Delta Gamma (Theta) Normal Approximation in Risk Measurement of Aapl’s and Gold’s Option. Media Statistika, 16(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.14710/medstat.16.2.160-169

Sulistianingsih, E., Rosadi, D., & Abdurakhman. (2019). Delta Normal and Delta Gamma Normal Approximation in Risk Measurement of Portfolio Consisted of Option and Stock. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2192(1), 090011. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139181

Sultra, I. W. E., Katili, M. R., & Payu, M. R. F. (2021). Metode Simulasi Historis untuk Perhitungan Nilai Value at Risk pada Portofolio dengan Model Markowitz. Euler: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Sains dan Teknologi, 9(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.34312/euler.v9i2.11518

Sunaryo, T. (2007). Manajemen Risiko Finansial. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wróblewski, M., Myślinski, A., & Nauk, I. B. S. P. A. (2023). Quantum Dynamics Approach for Non-Linear Black-Scholes Option Pricing. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Complexity, Future Information Systems and Risk (COMPLEXIS 2022), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.167285715.58647436/v1

Yu, X., & Xie, X. (2013). On Derivations of Black-Scholes Greek Letters. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(6), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.7176/RJFA




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i2.19669

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Ayu Astuti, Evy Sulistianingsih, Shantika Martha, Wirda Andani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_______________________________________________

JTAM already indexing:

                     


_______________________________________________

 

Creative Commons License

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) 
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________ 

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Editorial Office: