Students’ Cognitive Load in Understanding Linear Equation  in One Variable

Ainur Rofiq; Sudirman Sudirman; Makbul Muksar

doi:10.31764/jtam.v10i2.36034

Students’ Cognitive Load in Understanding Linear Equation in One Variable

Ainur Rofiq, Sudirman Sudirman, Makbul Muksar

Abstract

Cognitive load is the mental effort made by students in their working memory to process information received. This study aims to describe the cognitive load of students in understanding linear equation in one variable material. The research method used is qualitative with a case study type of research. The research was conducted at a junior high school in Malang. The research subjects were two active students selected based on the recommendation of the mathematics teacher in the class. Data were collected through observation sheets, interviews, and student reflection sheets, then analyzed using data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing techniques. The results showed that students experienced intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Intrinsic cognitive load occurred when faced with complex problems and story problems that required the processing of several concepts at once, such as equations, integer operations, distributive properties, and algebraic operations. Students experienced extraneous cognitive load because they did not have sufficient prerequisite knowledge due to the teacher providing apersepsi that did not help activate students' prior knowledge. Students misunderstood the definition of a linear equation in one variable and only memorized the rules for moving terms because the teacher used inappropriate terms in their explanation. Students were confused in understanding simple example questions because the teacher explained too quickly without giving students time to understand. Students' attention was divided because the teacher gave examples in the workbook, while the steps to solve the problems were written on the board. Students were unable to complete the exercises because the teacher did not pay attention to their understanding. Germane cognitive load occurred because students' understanding was procedural. This was because the teacher's learning strategy did not support the formation of knowledge schemas. These findings have implications for teachers to design learning that takes into account students' working memory capacity.

Keywords

Cognitive Load; Mathematics Learning; Linear Equation in One Variable.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Alreshidi, N. A. K. (2023). Enhancing topic-specific prior knowledge of students impacts their outcomes in mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 8(February), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1050468

Artino, A. R. (2008). Cognitive Load Theory and the Role of Learner Experience: An Abbreviated …. AACE Journal, 16(4), 425–439. http://www.editlib.org/d/25229/article_25229.pdf

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Reprint of: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 136, 89–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104479

Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Defining and Measuring Task Complexity Through Element Interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w

Costley, J., Fanguy, M., Lange, C., & Baldwin, M. (2021). The effects of video lecture viewing strategies on cognitive load. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09254-y

Dong, A., Jong, M. S. Y., & King, R. B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203

Endres, T., Lovell, O., Morkunas, D., Rieß, W., & Renkl, A. (2023). Can prior knowledge increase task complexity? – Cases in which higher prior knowledge leads to higher intrinsic cognitive load. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(S2), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12563

Gorbunova, A., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Costley, J. (2023). Are Inductive Teaching Methods Compatible with Cognitive Load Theory? Educational Psychology Review, 35(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09828-z

Gupta, U., & Zheng, R. Z. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252

Guzmán, J., & Zambrano R, J. (2024). Effects of Split-Attention and Task Complexity on Individual and Collaborative Learning. Education Sciences, 14(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091035

Kalyuga, S. (2011). Informing : A Cognitive Load Perspective. 14(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/1349

Kalyuga, S. (2025). Human Cognitive Architecture as an Intelligent Natural Information Processing System. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030332

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Matematika Fase A - Fase F. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Riset Dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, 11–12.

Kliziene, I., Paskovske, A., Cizauskas, G., Augustiniene, A., Simonaitiene, B., & Kubiliunas, R. (2022). brain sciences Ability in Primary School. 12(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060736

Langerock, N., Oberauer, K., Throm, E., & Vergauwe, E. (2025). The cognitive load effect in working memory : Refreshing the empirical landscape , removing outdated explanations. Journal of Memory and Language, 140(June 2023), 104558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2024.104558

Lenz, K., Reinhold, F., & Wittmann, G. (2024). Transitions between conceptual and procedural knowledge profiles. Patterns in understanding fractions and indicators for individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 116(August), 102548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102548

Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2024). Reasoning More Efficiently with Primary Knowledge Despite Extraneous Cognitive Load. Evolutionary Psychology, 22(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049241252694

Lin, Y. C., Liu, T. C., & Kalyuga, S. (2022). Strategies for facilitating processing of transient information in instructional videos by using learner control mechanisms. Instructional Science, 50(6), 863–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09600-w

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. In AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program studi Pendidikan Matematika (3rd ed., Vol. 17). SAGE Publications Inc.

Ncube, M., & Luneta, K. (2025). Concept-based instruction: Improving learner performance in mathematics through conceptual understanding. Pythagoras, 46(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v46i1.815

Ngu, B. H., & Phan, H. P. (2022). Advancing the study of solving linear equations with negative pronumerals: A smarter way from a cognitive load perspective. PLoS ONE, 17(3 March), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265547

Ngu, B. H., & Phan, H. P. (2024). Instructional approach and acquisition of mathematical proficiency: Theoretical insights from learning by comparison and cognitive load theory. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 3(3), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263241266765

Patel, D., & Alismail, A. (2024). Relationship Between Cognitive Load Theory , Intrinsic Motivation and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education : A Perspective on the Relationship Between Cognitive Load Theory , Intrinsic Motivation and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education : Advances in Medical Education and Practice ISSN:, 7258. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S441405

Pertiwi, R. I. (2020). Beban kognitif intrinsik siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal trigonometri ditinjau dari kecemasan. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v6i1.1739

Pharmer, R. L., Wickens, C. D., Plabst, L., Clegg, B. A., Hirshfield, L. M., Lewis, J. E., Nicoly, J. B., Spencer, C. A., & Ortega, F. R. (2021). The Impact of Simple, Brief, and Adaptive Instructions within Virtual Reality Training: Components of Cognitive Load Theory in an Assembly Task. 167–186.

Plass, L. J., Moreno, R., & Brunken, R. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory.

Rafi’ah, I., & Retnowati, E. (2023). Signaling Reduce Extraneous Cognitive Load From Split Attention Effects. Jurnal Pedagogi Matematika, 9(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jpm.v10i3.21761 SIGNALING

Rahmawati, A. D., Ardianzah, F., & Novitasari, M. M. P. (2024). Penerapan Teori Beban Kognitif dalam Pengajaran. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 4(04), 463–472.

Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110(February), 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. In Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies. Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London. http://www.springer.com/series/8640

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Wang, C.-C., Cheng, P. K.-H., & Wang, T.-H. (2022). Measurement of Extraneous and Germane Cognitive Load in the Mathematics Addition Task : An Event-Related Potential Study. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081036

Zarkasyi, M. H., Abidin, Z., & Praherdhiono, H. (2024). Beban Kognitif Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum Merdeka Sekolah Dasar. 01(02), 1–7.

Zhu, B., Chau, K. T., & Mokmin, N. A. M. (2024). Optimizing cognitive load and learning adaptability with adaptive microlearning for in-service personnel. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77122-1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v10i2.36034