Analysis of Prospective Teachers' Self-Training Needs Regarding Mathematical Software Adaptation

Supriyo Supriyo, Ani Afifah, Rani Darmayanti, Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq

Abstract


In the modern educational landscape, the integration of technology into mathematics education is crucial, and prospective teachers are expected to be not only passive users but also adaptive developers of digital content. Despite being labeled as the "digital generation," a paradox has emerged where general technological proficiency does not equate to competence in specialized mathematics software. This study addresses the self-paced training needs of prospective mathematics teachers at Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, aiming to improve their ability to adapt learning software effectively. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through questionnaires and in-depth interviews with final-year students, with the instruments validated through expert assessment and data triangulation to ensure reliability and accuracy. The study revealed a significant gap in technological proficiency: 88% of respondent demonstrated proficiency in basic visualization techniques, but only 4% mastered advanced features such as scripting. Analysis of self-paced learning patterns highlighted issues such as fragmented learning, reactive learning, and high cognitive load, underscoring the urgent need for a structured, project-based self-paced training roadmap. This roadmap will guide prospective teachers from understanding mathematical abstractions to effectively implementing digital functions, empowering them to become competent digital content developers and increasing the effectiveness of their teaching in technologically integrated classrooms.

 


Keywords


Prospective Teachers; Mathematical Software; Self-Regulated Learning; Digital Native Paradox.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Abror, M. H. (2022). Self-Regulated Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Plus Minus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i2.1100

Adhya, D. H., & Panda, S. (2026). An integrative systematic review analysis of research on technology ‑ enabled personalized learning and self ‑ regulated learning. Smart Learning Environments, 13(3), 2–26. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40561-025-00428-8

Adipat, S. (2021). Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) through Technology-Enhanced Content and Language-Integrated Learning (T-CLIL) Instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6461–6477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10648-3

Amelia, R. (2025). Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Reviewed from Self-Regulated Learning : Systematic Literature Review. Anatolian Journal of Education, 10(1), 91–102. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1467021

Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). A systematic literature review of the current discussion on mathematical modelling competencies: State-of-the-art developments in conceptualizing, measuring, and fostering. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10104-6

Christina Khaidir, Ahmad Fauzan, Arnellis, Mega Iswari, S. (2026). Local Instructional Theory of Definite Integral Learning to Improve Prospective Mathematics Teachers ’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills and Self-Regulated Learning. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 7(2), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2026.v07i01.09499

Frohlich, J. R., Goegan, L. D., & Daniels, L. M. (2020). Practicing teachers’ attributions for the behaviour of students with learning disabilities and attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 66(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v66i3.56950

García-Maza, S. (2025). Technical–Economic Assessment and FP2O Technical–Economic Resilience Analysis of the Gas Oil Hydrocracking Process at Large Scale. Sci, 7(1), 334–345. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7010017

Hsu, Y. Y. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of a preservice teacher technology training module incorporating SQD strategies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00205-2

Lämsä, J., Mooij, S. De, Baars, M., & Molenaar, I. (2026). Self-Regulated Learning, Multimodal Data, and Analysis Grid: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going? Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 1–10. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-025-10113-4

Liao, M. L., Yeh, C. C., Lue, J. H., Chien, C. L., Hsu, S. H., & Chang, M. F. (2022). Benefits of a bilingual web-based anatomy atlas for nursing students in learning anatomy. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 341. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03405-8

Maier, R., & Robson, K. L. (2020). Exploring university-to-college transfer in Ontario: A qualitative study of non-linear post-secondary mobility. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 50(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069653ar

Matthew, U. O. (2022). Educational Technology Adaptation & Implication for Media Technology Adoption in the Period of COVID-19. Journal of Trends in Computer Science and Smart Technology, 4(4), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.36548/jtcsst.2022.4.002

Mejía, P., Martini, L. C., Grijalva, F., Larco, J. C., & ... (2021). A survey on mathematical software tools for visually impaired persons: A practical perspective. IEEE …, 9(2), 66929–66947. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9417177

Melo-Pfeifer, S. (2022). Transforming Disinformation on Minorities Into a Pedagogical Resource: Towards a Critical Intercultural News Literacy. Media and Communication, 10(4), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5708

Mukamba, E., & Makamure, C. (2020). Integration of GeoGebra in teaching and learning geometric transformations at ordinary level in Zimbabwe. Mathematics and Science Education, 1(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/8431

Nazaretsky, T. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232

Oner, D. (2020). A virtual internship for developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5192

Özçakır, B., Özdemir, D., & Kıymaz, Y. (2020). Effects of dynamic geometry software on students’ geometric thinking regarding probability of giftedness in mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 48-61. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.664985

Qiu, C. a. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge in mainland China: A survey of teachers of Chinese as a second language. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6367–6391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10888-x

Rahim, N., Nesar, S., Mumtaz, T., Naeem, S., & Ali, M. S. (2022). Validation of questionnaire regarding online teaching (QOT) during Covid-19 in Karachi, Pakistan. PLOS ONE, 17(9 September), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274268

Ramadhani, W., Maryani, I., & Vehachart, R. (2022). Literature Study on Self-Regulated Learning in Science Learning of Elementary School Students. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 1(02), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v1i02.71

Rosnelli. (2023). Independent Curriculum Learning Management to Improve Students’ Literacy and Numerical Competence in Schools. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 11(4), 946–963. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3513

Shinta, O., & Agoestanto, A. (2025). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Dan Self- Regulated Learning Siswa Pada Model. Prisma, 8(1), 283–292. https://proceedings.unnes.ac.id/prisma/article/view/4326

Sudatha, I. G. W., & Agustini, K. (2026). Implikasi Pedagogis Alat Kreasi Visual-Digital terhadap Kompetensi 4C dan Literasi Digital : Tinjauan Sistematis. 15(1), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.3705

Tesfamicael, S. A. (2022). Prospective teachers' cognitive engagement during virtual teaching using GeoGebra and Desmos. Pythagoras, 43(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V43I1.691

Velten, K., Schmidt, D. M., & Kahlen, K. (2024). Mathematical modeling and simulation: introduction for scientists and engineers. books.google.com.

Viberg, O. (2020). Validating an instrument to measure teachers’ preparedness to use digital technology in their teaching. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2020-01-04

Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learningw, 31(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1770801

Wahyuni, S. F., Sari, M., Astuty, W., Lestari, S. P., & Hafas, H. R. (2025). Determinants of Personal Financial Management: Exploring The Mediating Role of Locus of Control Among Multigenerational Caregivers in Medan. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 8(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v8i1.3978

Widana, I. W. (2020). Meta-Analysis : The Relationship Between Self- Regulated Learning And Mathematical Critical Reasoning. Education Innovation Diversity (EID), 1(4), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.17770/eid2022.1.6739

Yani, T. A. (2025). Examining the relationship between mathematical literacy and digital literacy among pre-service mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16392

Yin, J. (2021). Conversation Technology With Micro-Learning: The Impact of Chatbot-Based Learning on Students’ Learning Motivation and Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952067

Zholymbayev, O. (2022). Training teachers in science subjects through STEAM technologies. World Journal on Educational Technology Current Issues, 14(4), 1197–1204. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i4.7707

Zou, D. (2021). Digital game-based learning of information literacy: Effects of gameplay modes on university students’ learning performance, motivation, self-efficacy and flow experiences. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.14742/AJET.6682




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v10i3.37325

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Supriyo, Ani Afifah, Rani Darmayanti, Syed Muhammad Yousaf Farooq

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_______________________________________________

JTAM already indexing:

                     


_______________________________________________

 

Creative Commons License

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) 
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________ 

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Editorial Office: