Comparative Evaluation of Cheng and Church and BCBimax Biclustering Algorithms on Sustainable Development Goals Data

Destriana Aulia Rifaldi, Indahwati Indahwati, Muhammad Nur Aidi

Abstract


Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) comprise multidimensional indicators that reflect various aspects of sustainable development and often exhibit heterogeneous patterns across countries. Although biclustering has been widely applied to analyze high-dimensional data, comparative studies evaluating the performance of the Cheng and Church (CC) and Binary Inclusion-Maximal Biclustering (BCBimax) algorithms on SDGs data remain limited. Therefore, this study compares the performance of the CC and BCBimax algorithms in identifying local patterns in the 2024 SDGs achievement data. The dataset consists of 167 countries and 17 SDG indicators obtained from the Sustainable Development Report. Data exploration was conducted using heatmaps and PCA biplots, followed by biclustering analysis. The CC algorithm was applied to standardized numerical data, while BCBimax was implemented on binarized data using several thresholding approaches. Algorithm performance was evaluated using the number of biclusters, Average Squared Residue (ASR), Jaccard Index, and row membership coverage. The results indicate that the optimal CC model was obtained at δ = 0.14, producing 7 biclusters with complete coverage of all 167 countries and an ASR value of 0.2465. In contrast, the optimal BCBimax model generated 38 biclusters with a lower ASR value of 0.0450, indicating greater homogeneity, but covered only 112 countries. The Jaccard Index of 30.61% suggests low similarity between the bicluster structures produced by the two algorithms. Overall, CC provides broader coverage and better represents numerical data patterns, whereas BCBimax produces more homogeneous and specific biclusters.

Keywords


ASR; BCBimax; Biclustering; Cheng and Church; SDGs.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Alfó, M., Marino, M. F., & Martella, F. (2024). Biclustering multivariate discrete longitudinal data. Statistics and Computing, 34(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-023-10292-6

Castanho, E. N., Aidos, H., & Madeira, S. C. (2022). Biclustering fMRI time series: a comparative study. BMC Bioinformatics, 23(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04733-8

Castanho, E. N., Lobo, J. P., Henriques, R., & Madeira, S. C. (2023). G-bic: Generating synthetic benchmarks for biclustering. BMC Bioinformatics, 24(1), 457. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04733-8

Castanho, E. N., Aidos, H., & Madeira, S. C. (2024). Biclustering data analysis: a comprehensive survey. In Briefings in Bioinformatics, 25(4). Bbae342. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae342

Chu, H. M., Liu, J. X., Zhang, K., Zheng, C. H., Wang, J., & Kong, X. Z. (2022). A binary biclustering algorithm based on the adjacency difference matrix for gene expression data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 23(1), 436. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04842-4

Di Iorio, J., Chiaromonte, F., Cremona, M. A., & Cremona, M. A. (2020). On the bias of H-scores for comparing biclusters, and how to correct it. In Bioinformatics, 36(9), 2955-2957. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa060

Hess, S., Pio, G., Hochstenbach, M., & Ceci, M. (2021). BROCCOLI: overlapping and outlier-robust biclustering through proximal stochastic gradient descent. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 35(6), 2542–2576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-021-00787-z

Izzati, H., Indahwati, & Djuraidah, A. (2024). BCBimax Biclustering Algorithm with Mixed-Type Data. JUITA: Jurnal Informatika, 12(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30595/juita.v12i1.21519

Karim, M. B., Kanaya, S., & Altaf-Ul-Amin, M. (2019). Implementation of BiClusO and its comparison with other biclustering algorithms. Applied Network Science, 4(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0180-x

Ma, T., Guo, L., Yan, H., & Wang, L. (2023). Cobind: quantitative analysis of the genomic overlaps. Bioinformatics Advances, 3(1), vbad104. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad104

Neumann, S., & Miettinen, P. (2020). Biclustering and boolean matrix factorization in data streams. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 13(10), 1709–1722. https://doi.org/10.14778/3401960.3401968

Nicholls, K., & Wallace, C. (2021). Comparison of sparse biclustering algorithms for gene expression datasets. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(6), bbab140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab140

Padilha, V. A., & Campello, R. J. G. B. (2017). A systematic comparative evaluation of biclustering techniques. BMC Bioinformatics, 18(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1487-1

Pio, G., Ceci, M., & Malerba, D. (2021). Biclustering methods for biomedical data analysis: A survey based on methodological, biological and application perspectives. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(6), bbab421. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012068

Putri, C. A., Irfani, R., & Sartono, B. (2021). Recognizing poverty pattern in Central Java using Biclustering Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1863(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1863/1/012068

Rubio, A. S., Viveros, A. M., Morales Luna, G. B., & López, M. P. (2020). Towards BiMAX: Binary inclusion-maximal parallel implementation for gene expression analysis. Computacion y Sistemas, 24(1), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-24-1-2979

Wang, H., Song, Y., Chen, W., Luo, Z., Li, C., & Li, T. (2024). A Survey of Co-Clustering. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 18(9), Article 223. https://doi.org/10.1145/3681793

Wani, A. A. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of clustering algorithms: exploring limitations and innovative solutions. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.2286

Wongoutong, C. (2024). The impact of neglecting feature scaling in k-means clustering. PLoS ONE, 19(12), e0310839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310839

Yoo, K. H., Leung, C. K., & Nasridinov, A. (2022). Big Data Analysis and Visualization: Challenges and Solutions. In Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(16), 8248. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168248




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v10i4.40389

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Destriana Aulia Rifaldi, Indahwati Indahwati, Muhammad Nur Aidi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_______________________________________________

JTAM already indexing:


_______________________________________________

Creative Commons License

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Editorial Office: