Exploring Students’ Interpretation Skills on Data of Covid-19 Infographic Relating to Statistic

Rebecca Ester Marsaulina Sihotang; Zulkardi Zulkardi; Nyimas Aisyah

doi:10.31764/jtam.v5i2.4043

Exploring Students’ Interpretation Skills on Data of Covid-19 Infographic Relating to Statistic

Rebecca Ester Marsaulina Sihotang, Zulkardi Zulkardi, Nyimas Aisyah

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the ability to interpret the Covid-19 infographic data relating to statistics. This research was a descriptive study with a qualitative approach and using online system. The data collection techniques are carried out through test of the ability of interpreting the Covid-19 infographic data and interview. The subjects of this study were students of grade VII, Junior High School 1 Palembang which consisted of 4 students with various ability. The most common indicators are reading simple graph, reading a trend in graph and extracting qualitative information from quantitative information. The least likely indicator is reading key features from graphs and comparing information from two graphs.

Keywords

Data Interpretation skills; Infographic of Covid-19; Statistic;

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Amin, B. D., Sahib, E. P., Harianto, Y. I., Patandean, A. J., Herman, & Sujiono, E. H. (2020). The interpreting ability on science kinematics graphs of senior high school students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23349

Aoyama, K., & Stephens, M. (2003). Graph interpretation aspects of statistical literacy: A Japanese perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217380

Apriyanti, N., Shaharom, M. S. N., Abdul Rahim, S. S., & Abdul Razak, R. (2020). Needs Analysis Of Infographic Media Using Technology for Learning Physics. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2020.01.004

Arigia, M. B., Damayanti, T., & Sani, A. (2016). Infografis Sebagai Media Dalam Meningkatkan Pemahaman Dan Keterlibatan Publik Bank Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi, Vol 8, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Komunikasi, 120–133.

Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017). Leaping from discrete to continuous independent variables: Sixth graders’ science line graph interpretations. Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 455–484. https://doi.org/10.1086/690204

Chan, S. W., & Ismail, Z. (2012). The Role of Information Technology in Developing Students’ Statistical Reasoning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3660–3664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.123

ÇİL, E. enimeonyedi hotmail com, & Kar, H. (2015). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Interpretations Of Graphs: A Cross-Sectional Study. Science Educator, 24(1), 36–44. https://login.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=108515663&site=eds-live

Damyanov, I., & Tsankov, N. (2018). The role of infographics for the development of skills for cognitive modeling in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7541

Elena Gallagher, S., O’Dulain, M., O’Mahony, N., Kehoe, C., McCarthy, F., & Morgan, G. (2017). Instructor-provided summary infographics to support online learning. Educational Media International, 54(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2017.1362795

Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making Sense of Graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158. https://vis.arc.vt.edu/~npolys/projects/safas/749671.pdf%5Cnhttps://snoid.sv.vt.edu/~npolys/projects/safas/749671.pdf

Hartini, S., Somakim, & Kesumawati, N. (2015). Desain Pembelajaran Matematika Pengolahan Data Menggunakan Konteks Adiwiyata Melalui Pendekatan PMRI di SD. Numeracy Journal, II, 72–90.

Maulidina, A. P. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar Berkemampuan Tinggi Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.21067/jbpd.v3i2.3408

MENDIKBUD. (2019). Merdeka Belajar. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–21.

MOEC. (2020a). Development of Minimum Competency Assessment. Jakarta: Pusmenjar Kemdikbud.

MOEC. (2020b). Minimum Competency Assessment and Its Implications for Learning. Jakarta: Pusmenjar Kemdikbud.

Naparin, H., & Binti Saad, A. (2017). Infographics in Education : Review on Infographics Design. The International Journal of Multimedia & Its Applications, 9(4/5/6), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijma.2017.9602

Nasrullah, R., Aditya, W., Satya, T. I., Nento, M. N., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, & Akbari, Q. S. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Digital. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 43. http://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/literasi-DIGITAL.pdf

NCTM. (2000). Principle and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2020a). Designing PISA-like mathematics problem in covid-19 pandemic (PISAComat). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012057

Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2020b). Designing PISA-like mathematics problem relating change and relationship using physical distancing context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012004

OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do. In CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (Vol. 1, Issue 2014). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2012-results-what-students-know-and-can-do-volume-i_9789264201118-en%5Cnhttp://www.crossref.org/deleted_DOI.html%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en%5CnISBN

OECD. (2015). Assessment and Analytical Framework.

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264190511-en.pdf?expires=1569847112&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=08AEA3FD9105123D4555A383BD097B5E

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Results. Combined Executive Summaries. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.

Rohana, R., & Ningsih, Y. L. (2019). Students’ Statistical Reasoning in Statistics Method Course. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6732.81-90

Rosidah. (2016). Penalaran Statistis Siswa SMA dalam Pemecahan Masalah Statistika Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 02(5), 57–65.

Siricharoen, W. V. (2013). Infogragraphics: The New communication Tools in Digital Age. The International Conference on E-Technologies and Business on the Web, April, 169–174. http://sdiwc.net/digital-library/infographics-the-new-communication-tools-in-digital-age

Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kazotti, E., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2018). Student understanding of graph slope and area under a graph: A comparison of physics and nonphysics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020109

Tsai, S., Huang, H., & Chang, T. (2020). Education Sciences Developing a Motion Infographic-Based Learning System for Effective Learning. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–11.

Whitaker, D., & Jacobbe, T. (2017). Students’ understanding of bar graphs and histograms: Results from the LOCUS assessments. Journal of Statistics Education, 25(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2017.1321974

Yansen, D., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Fatimah, S. (2019). Developing pisa-like mathematics problems on uncertainty and data using asian games football context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5249.37-46

Yusuf, Y. (2017). Konstruksi Penalaran Statistis Pada Statistika Penelitian. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i1.p60-69

Zulkardi, Meryansumayeka, Putri, R. I. I., Alwi, Z., Nusantara, D. S., Ambarita, S. M., Maharani, Y., & Puspitasari, L. (2020). How students work with pisa-like mathematical tasks using covid-19 context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12915.405-416

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i2.4043