Quantity Content: Developing Mathematics PISA-Like Problems with Independence Day Contest Context

Nindy Fadlila; Ariyadi Wijaya; Irfan Hilmi

doi:10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7475

Quantity Content: Developing Mathematics PISA-Like Problems with Independence Day Contest Context

Nindy Fadlila, Ariyadi Wijaya, Irfan Hilmi

Abstract

PISA is an international scale assessment in which it measure mathematical literacy skills. Indonesia was one of the participants who took part in the PISA assessment. PISA results show that Indonesia is still at a low level. In fact, some study show that the ability of Indonesian students to solve PISA questions on the quantity content of students is not good and is still low compared to other content. This research aims to produce PISA-Like math questions with Quantity content that are valid, practical and have a potential effect on mathematical literacy skills. This research using a development research which consists of preliminary, self-evaluation, expert review, one-to-one, small group, and field test stages. The subjects in this study were students of class IX-4 SMP inone of the junior high schools in Medan. The results of this study are PISA-Like questions with Quantity content in valid and practical criteria. From the analysis of students’ answers regarding the potential effect involved in mathematical literacy, the results show that students involve communication skills, reasoning and argument skills, mathematical abilities, representation abilities, devising strategies for solving problems, and using symbolic, formal skill, and technical language and operations.

Keywords

Quantity; PISA-Like; Mathematical Literacy;

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Ahyan, S., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2014). Developing mathematics problems based on pisa level of change and relationships content. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.5.1.1448.47-56

Anisah, Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2011). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model Pisa Pada Konten Quantity Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.5.1.333.

Charmila, N., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Menggunakan Konteks Jambi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 198–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7444

del Prado Hill, P., Friedland, E., & McMillen, S. (2016). Mathematics-Literacy Checklists: A Pedagogical Innovation to Support Teachers as They Implement the Common Core. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 8(1), 23–38. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1133599.pdf

Edo, S. I., Hartono, Y., & Putri, R. I. I. (2013). Investigating secondary school students’ difficulties in modeling problems PISA-model level 5 and 6. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.1.561.41-58

Goos, M., & Kaya, S. (2020). Understanding and promoting students’ mathematical thinking: a review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7

Jailani, J., Heri Retnawati, H. R., Wulandari, N. F., & Djidu, H. (2020). Mathematical Literacy Proficiency Development Based on Content, Context, and Process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.80

Junika, N., Izzati, N., & Tambunan, R. (2020). Pengembangan Soal Statistika Model PISA untuk Melatih Kemampuan Literasi Statistika Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(September), 499–510. https://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa/article/view/mv9n3_13

Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0

Kohar, A. W., Wardani, A. K., & Fachrudin, A. D. (2019). Profiling context-based mathematics tasks developed by novice PISA-like task designers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1200(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1200/1/012014

Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.467

Liang, X. (2010). Assessment use, self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Comparative analysis of PISA 2003 data of Finland, Canada and the USA. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.490875

Machromah, I. U., Sutama, Prayitno, J. H., Faiziyah, N., & Fatmasari, L. W. (2020). Designing PISA-like mathematics task to assess students’ mathematical literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4986–4995. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081072

Maharani, L., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2019). Aquatic in Asian games: Context of pisa-like mathematics problem. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.5252.459-470

Munayati, Z., zulkardi, & Santoso, B. (2015). Kajian Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Menggunakan Framework PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 9(2), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.22342/JPM.9.2.2161.188

Murtiyasa, B., Rejeki, S., & Setyaningsih, R. (2018). PISA-like problems using Indonesian contexts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1040(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012032

Nurutami, A., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2018). Identification of Mathematical Literacy Students Level 2, 3, 4 of Pisa Task. Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Islam (ICMIs), 36, 423–426. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008523004230426

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results: Excellence and Equity in Education (Volume 1): Vol. I. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-5-en

OECD. (2018). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa-2021-mathematics-framework-draft.pdf

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: Combined Executive Summaries (Volume 1, 2 & 3). PISA 2009 at a Glance, I. https://doi.org/10.1787/g222d18af-en

Permatasari, R., Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2018). PiSA-like: Football context in Asian games. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5251.271-280

Pulungan, D. A. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Matematika Model PISA (Developing Instrument of Mathematical Literacy Test Based on PISA Model). Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 2–6. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/download/4399/4053

Putra, E. S., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2018). PISA-Like Problems With Swimming Context. 5th ICRIEMS Proceedings, 371–378.

Putra, Y. Y., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Konten Bilangan untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Elemen, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v2i1.175

Putri, R. I. I., & Zulkardi. (2020). Designing piSA-like mathematics task using Asian games context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9786.135-144

Putri, & Zulkardi, Z. (2018). Higher-order thinking skill problem on data representation in primary school: A case study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012056

Rahmawati, W. A., Usodo, B., & Fitriana, D. L. (2021). Mathematical Literacy Skills Students of the Junior High School in Solving PISA-Like Mathematical Problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1808(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012045

Rizki, L. M., & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088

Saputri, N. W., & Zulkardi, Z. (2019). Pengembangan Lkpd Pemodelan Matematika Siswa Smp Menggunakan Konteks Ojek Online. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6825.1-14

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126

Stacey, K. (2012). The International Assessment of Mathematical Literacy: PISA 2012 Framework and Items. Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43

Suciati, Munadi, S., Sugiman, & Ratna Febriyanti, W. D. (2020). Design and validation of mathematical literacy instruments for assessment for learning in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.865

Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. Kogan Page. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203061978

Unver, S. K., Hidiroglu, C. N., Dede, A. T., & Guzel, E. B. (2018). Factors revealed while posing mathematical modelling problems by mathematics student teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.941

Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584.

Yansen, D., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Fatimah, S. (2019). Developing pisa-like mathematics problems on uncertainty and data using asian games football context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5249.37-46

Zulkardi. (2002). Developing A Learning Environment On Realistic Mathematics Education For Indonesian Student Teacher. In Dissertation. http://doc.utwente.nl/58718/1/thesis_Zulkardi.pdf

Zulkardi, Meryansumayeka, Putri, R. I. I., Alwi, Z., Nusantara, D. S., Ambarita, S. M., Maharani, Y., & Puspitasari, L. (2020). How students work with pisa-like mathematical tasks using covid-19 context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12915.405-416

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7475