GRG Non-Linear and ARWM Methods for Estimating the GARCH-M, GJR, and log-GARCH Models

Didit Budi Nugroho, Lam Peter Panjaitan, Dini Kurniawati, Zaini Kholil, Bambang Susanto, Leopoldus Ricky Sasongko

Abstract


Numerous variants of the basic Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models have been proposed to provide good volatility estimating and forecasting. Most of the study does not work Excel’s Solver to estimate GARCH-type models. The first purpose of this study is to provide the capability analyze of the GRG non-linear method built in Excel’s Solver to estimate the GARCH models in comparison to the adaptive random walk Metropolis method in Matlab by own codes. The second contribution of this study is to evaluate some characteristics and performance of the GARCH-M(1,1), GJR(1,1), and log-GARCH(1,1) models with Normal and Student-t error distributions that fitted to financial data. Empirical analyze is based on the application of models and methods to the DJIA, S&P500, and S&P CNX Nifty stock indices. The first empirical result showed that Excel’s Solver’s Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) non-linear method has capability to estimate the econometric models. Second, the GJR(1,1) models provide the best fitting, followed by the GARCH-M(1,1), GARCH(1,1), and log-GARCH(1,1) models. This study concludes that Excel’s Solver’s GRG non-linear can be recommended to the practitioners that do not have enough knowledge in the programming language in order to estimate the econometrics models. It also suggests to incorporate a risk premium in the return equation and an asymmetric effect in the variance equation.

 


Keywords


ARWM; Excel’s Solver; GARCH; GRG Non-Linear; Student-t;

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Abonongo, J., Oduro, F. T., & Ackora-Prah, J. (2016). Modelling Volatility and the Risk-Return Relationship of Some Stocks on the Ghana Stock Exchange. American Journal of Economics, 6(6), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20160606.01

Ahmed, R. R., Vveinhardt, J., Streimikiene, D., & Channar, Z. A. (2018). Mean Reversion in International Markets: Evidence from G.A.R.C.H. and Half-life Volatility Models. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1198–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1456358

Ali, G. (2013). EGARCH, GJR-GARCH, TGARCH, AVGARCH, NGARCH, IGARCH and APARCH Models for Pathogens at Marine Recreational Sites. Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, 2(3), 57–73.

Bouri, E. I. (2014). Beyond the Negative Relation between Return and Conditional Volatility in the Wine Market: Is Fine Wine Particularly Luscious for Investors? International Journal of Wine Business Research, 26(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-01-2014-0006

Bouri, E. I., & Roubaud, D. (2016). Fine Wines and Stocks from the Perspective of UK Investors: Hedge or Safe Haven? Journal of Wine Economics, 11(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2015.10

Brooks, C. (1997). GARCH Modelling in Finance: A Review of the Software Options. The Economic Journal, 107(443), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00022.x

Bucevska, V. (2013). An Empirical Evaluation of GARCH Models in Value-at-Risk Estimation: Evidence from the Macedonian Stock Exchange. Business Systems Research, 4(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2013-0005

Charles, A., & Darné, O. (2019). The Accuracy of Asymmetric GARCH Model Estimation. International Economics, 157, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.11.001

Chen, H., Zhang, J., Tao, Y., & Tan, F. (2019). Asymmetric GARCH Type Models for Asymmetric Volatility Characteristics Analysis and Wind Power Forecasting. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-019-0146-0

Engle, R. F., Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2019). Large Dynamic Covariance Matrices. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 37(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2017.1345683

Hamzaoui, N., & Regaieg, B. (2016). The Glosten-Jagannathan-Runkle-Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic approach to investigating the foreign exchange forward premium volatility. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1608–1615.

Le, H., Pham, U., Nguyen, P., & Pham, T. B. (2020). Improvement on Monte Carlo Estimation of HPD Intervals. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 49(9), 2164–2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1513141

Lim, C. M., & Sek, S. K. (2013). Comparing the Performances of GARCH-type Models in Capturing the Stock Market Volatility in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5(13), 478–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00056-7

Liu, R., Shao, Z., Wei, G., & Wang, W. (2017). GARCH Model with Fat-Tailed Distributions and Bitcoin Exchange Rate Returns. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 1(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.11.71.75

Mostafa, F., Dillon, T., & Chang, E. (2017). Time Series Modelling. In Computational Intelligence Applications to Option Pricing, Volatility Forecasting and Value at Risk (Vol. 697, p. 26). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-319-51668-4_2

Mostafa, F., Saha, P., Islam, M. R., & Nguyen, N. (2021). GJR-GARCH Volatility Modeling under NIG and ANN for Predicting Top Cryptocurrencies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14090421

Nugroho, D. B. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Three MCMC Methods for Estimating GARCH Models. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 403(1), 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/403/1/012061

Nugroho, D. B., Kurniawati, D., Panjaitan, L. P., Kholil, Z., Susanto, B., & Sasongko, L. R. (2019). Empirical Performance of GARCH, GARCH-M, GJR-GARCH and log-GARCH Models for Returns Volatility. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1307(1), 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1307/1/012003

Nugroho, D. B., Mahatma, T., & Pratomo, Y. (2021a). Applying the non-linear transformation families to the lagged-variance of EGARCH and GJR models. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 51(4), 908–919.

Nugroho, D. B., Mahatma, T., & Pratomo, Y. (2021b). GARCH Models under Power Transformed Returns: Empirical Evidence from International Stock Indices. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 50(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v50i4.1075

Nugroho, D. B., & Morimoto, T. (2015). Estimation of realized stochastic volatility models using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo-Based methods. Computational Statistics, 30(2), 491–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-014-0546-6

Nugroho, D. B., & Morimoto, T. (2016). Box–Cox Realized Asymmetric Stochastic Volatility Models with Generalized Student’s t-Error Distributions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 43(10), 1906–1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2015.1125862

Nugroho, D. B., Susanto, B., & Rosely, M. M. M. (2018). Penggunaan MS Excel untuk Estimasi Model GARCH(1,1). Jurnal Matematika Integratif, 14(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v14.n2.17680.71-82

Nugroho, Didit Budi, Susanto, B., Prasetia, K. N. P., & Rorimpandey, R. (2019). Modeling of Returns Volatility using GARCH(1,1) Model under Tukey Transformations. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 21(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.20.1.12-20

Omari, C. O., Mwita, P. N., & Waititu, A. G. (2017). Modeling USD/KES Exchange Rate Volatility Using GARCH Models. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 08(01), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0801011526

Perneger, T. V. (2021). How to Use Likelihood Ratios to Interpret Evidence from Randomized Trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 136, 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.010

Portet, S. (2020). A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion. Infectious Disease Modelling, 5, 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IDM.2019.12.010

Powell, S. G., & Batt, R. J. (2008). Modeling for insight: A master class for business analysts. John Wiley & Sons.

Rodriguez, G. (2017). Selecting between Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity Models: An Empirical Application to the Volatility of Stock Returns in Peru. Revista de Análisis Económico, 32(1), 69–94.

Sucarrat, G. (2019). The Log-GARCH Model via ARMA Representations. In J. Chevallier, S. Goutte, D. Guerreiro, S. Saglio, & B. Sanhaji (Eds.), Financial Mathematics, Volatility and Covariance Modelling (pp. 336–360). Routledge.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7694

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Didit Budi Nugroho, Lam Peter Panjaitan, Dini Kurniawati, Zaini Kholil, Bambang Susanto, Leopoldus Ricky Sasongko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

_______________________________________________

JTAM already indexing:

                       _______________________________________________

 

Creative Commons License

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) 
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

______________________________________________

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________ 

JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) Editorial Office: