Reading Handbook Development Based on TOEIC For Balikpapan State Polytechnic Students (Research and Development Study)

Elisabeth Milaningrum, Masrul Huda

Abstract


This research aims to develop the existing reading handbook that is related to the students' needs and students’ English proficiency at Balikpapan State Polytechnic. The research method used research and development (R & D) for developing a supplementary existing reading handbook based on TOEIC. The R & D study is divided into 2 stages: (1) exploration stage, consisting of library research, document analysis, and needs analysis. Based on the findings of the exploration stage, it can be concluded that: (a) the students have difficulty in analyzing the question pattern of completion and error recognition; (b) the students do not master the vocabularies of TOEIC reading comprehension ;(c) the students do not familiar with the context of TOEIC reading text; (d) the students have difficulty to analyze the pattern of TOEIC reading comprehension question; and (2) development stage, consisting of numerous steps aimed at designing  the supplementary existingreading handbook based on TOEIC : (a) designing prototype based on the result of exploration stage; (b) experts’ validation; (c) trying out the prototype; (d) final revision. The result shows that supplementary existing reading handbook based on TOEIC can help the students increase their TOEIC reading score and useful in their job field.


Keywords


Reading Handbook; Students’ Need; TOEIC; Research and Development.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed). Longman.

Bresnihan, B. D. (2012). Using TOEIC Scores to Evaluate Student Performance in English Language Courses. Journal of Cultural Science, 47, 1–47.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Third edition). Pearson Education.

Cohen, A. D. (2006). The Coming of Age of Research on Test-Taking Strategies. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(4), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701333129

Daza, C., & Suzuki, M. (2004). A Review of the Reading Section of the TOEIC. TESL Canada Journal, 22(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i1.163

Educational Testing Services. (2005). ETS TOEIC Examinee Handbook. Princeton. https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/listening-reading-examinee-handbook.pdf

Educational Testing Services. (2015). ETS Examinee Handbook. Princeton. https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/listening-reading-examinee-handbook.pdf

Educational Testing Services. (2016). TOEIC Test Sample. Princeton. https://www.ets.org/s/toeic/pdf/toeic-listening-reading-sample-test-updated.pdf

Ellis, M., & Johnson, C. (2007). Teaching business English (7. impr). Oxford Univ. Pr.

Fauziati, E. (2016). Analisis Pertanyaan Pada Butir Soal Reading Comprehension Pada Test TOEIC. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 17(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v17i1.2347

Imsa-ard, P. (2019). TOEIC Reading Section: The Evaluation of the Four Cardinal Criteria for Testing a Test. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication 24 (36), 91-110., 24(36), 91–110.

Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430802132279

Liu, J. (2013). The Relationship Among TOEIC® Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing Skills. ETS.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Nuttall, C. E. (1982). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Heinemann Educational Books.

Oliveri, M. E., & Tannenbaum, R. J. (2017). Insights Into Using TOEIC ® Test Scores to Inform Human Resource Management Decisions: Informing HR Decisions With TOEIC ® Scores. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12177

Powers, D. E., & Powers, A. (2015). The incremental contribution of TOEIC® Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing tests to predicting performance on real-life English language tasks. Language Testing, 32(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214551855

Ridge, E. (2011). Keiko Koda. 2005. Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Cambridge University Press. Per Linguam, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5785/24-2-46

Saaristo, P. (2015). Grammar is the heart of language: Grammar and its role in language learning among Finnish university students. In J. Jalkanen, E. Jokinen, & P. Taalas (Eds.), Voices of pedagogical development – Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning (pp. 279–318). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000296

Tokunaga, M. (2008). Evaluation of the TOEIC Test Preparation Class At Konan University. 7, 41–55.

Trew, G. (2006). Tactics for TOEIC® Speaking and Writing Tests Pack. Oxford University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1226

Yi-Ching, Pan. (2010). Enhancing Students’ Communicative Competency and Test-Taking Skills Through TOEIC Preparatory Materials. TESOL Journal, 3, 81–91.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v4i3.5553

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Elisabeth Milaningrum, Masrul Huda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) already indexed:

            

___________________________________________________________________

  
   https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.

   Creative Commons License
   IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application)
   is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 View IJECA Stats

____________________________________________________________________

 IJECA Publisher Office: