Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Test based on Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Irfan Hilmi; Nindy Fadlila; Eka Ramadanti; Heri Retnawati; Elly Arliani

doi:10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7292

Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Test based on Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Irfan Hilmi, Nindy Fadlila, Eka Ramadanti, Heri Retnawati, Elly Arliani

Abstract

The unequal amount of questions that test students' lower and higher-order thinking skills is a concern in mathematics learning evaluation. The unequal amount of questions resulted in poor cognitive levels among students. The purpose of this study is to develop questions that may be used to assess the higher-order thinking skills of senior high school pupils and fulfill the requirements of being valid, practical, and effective. This study is a developmental research that employs the formative evaluation model. Validation sheets, student evaluation sheets, and examinations that measure students' higher-order thinking skills are among the data gathering procedures employed. According to the researchers' findings, the questions generated matched the valid, practical, and effective requirements. The valid criteria are based on the validators' assessments, and both validators agree that the questions created are good and possible to utilize with a few adjustments. Student answer papers to the established questions serve as the basis for practical criteria. According to the response form, 85 percent of pupils answered positively to the questions. Effective criteria are based on pupils' abilities to answer the questions that have been established. According to the test findings, 85 percent of students satisfied the minimal completeness requirements for both questions testing higher-order thinking skills, indicating that the questions were effective. The questions that have been developed by researchers can be used by teachers to evaluate students' higher-order thinking skills so that teachers do not only provide questions that measure students' lower-order thinking skills. In addition, the questions that have been developed can be used as a reference for developing questions that can measure students' higher-order thinking skills.

Keywords

Test instrument; Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised; Formative Evaluation;

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References

Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Halim, N. D. A., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00601a

Abosalem, Y. (2016). Assessment techniques and students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Secondary Education, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20160401.11

Afifah, I. R. N., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Is it difficult to teach higher order thinking skills? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012098

Alhassora, N. S. A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Inculcating higher-order thinking skills in mathematics: Why is it so hard? Man in India, 97(13), 51–62. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318635333

Amelia, D., Susanto, S., & Fatahillah, A. (2016). Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Himpunan Berdasarkan Ranah Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Kelas VII-A di SMPN 14 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v2i1.3402

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Reviosion of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. In Addison Wesley Longman. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281462

Arifin, Z., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur higher order thinking skills matematika siswa SMA kelas X. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i1.14058

Barut, M. E. O., & Wijaya, A. (2021). Examining Middle School Student’s Lower Order Thinking Skill. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Sciences (ICRIEMS 2020), 528(Icriems 2020), 362–367. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210305.052

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Alexandria. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741808801819

Budiman, A., & Jailani, J. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Higher Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Smp Kelas Viii Semester 1. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2671

Cahyono, B., & Adilah, N. (2016). Analisis Soal dalam Buku Siswa Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Kelas VIII Semester I Berdasarkan Dimensi Kognitif dari TIMSS. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2016.1.1.86-98

Fadlila, N., & Sagala, P. N. (2021). Development of Test Instrument Based Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve High Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012068

Febrilia, B. R. A. (2019). Profil Kemampuan Guru dalam Merancang Soal/Permasalahan Matematika Ditinjau dari Taksonomi Bloom. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 4(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v4i2.859

Gusdinata, J., & Somakim. (2020). The Development of Mathematics HOTS Problems on Trigonometric for Senior High School. 422(Icope 2019), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.085

Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/18cb/f158f9fe80ad4b70ff2fea0d8697c7ed5474.pdf

Himmah, W. I., Nayazik, A., & Setyawan, F. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze the final mathematics examination problems in Junior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012028

Husna, M., Johar, R., Hajidin, & Mailizar. (2018). Development of algebra test questions based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012043

Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935–942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935

Klorina, M. J., Agustinsa, R., & Susanta, A. (2021). Analisis Soal Buku Mandiri Matematika Terbitan Erlangga Smp Materi Transformasi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains). 9(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v9i2.10356

Kusaeri, Sadieda, L. U., Indayati, T., & Faizien, M. I. (2018). Developing an Assessment Instrument of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics with in Islamic Context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012151

Listiani, W., & Sulistyorini, Y. (2020). The Ability of Students as Teacher Candidates in Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills Mathematics Test. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(9), 87–100.

Mandini, G. W., & Hartono, H. (2018). Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal HOTS model TIMSS dan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v13i2.21234

Megawati, M., Wardani, A. K., & Hartatiana, H. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Smp Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Model Pisa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.14.1.6815.15-24

Meldawati, M., Maimunah, M., & Yenita Roza, Y. R. (2020). The Ability of Junior High School Mathematics Teachers in Kampar Regency in Developing Higher Order Thinking Skills. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i3.16672

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Regulation of The Minister of Education and Culture Number 22 of 2016 concerning Process Standards for Primary and Secondary Education.

Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliott, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning (Issue December). Cambridge University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489914

Muklis, Y. M., Subanti, S., & Sujadi, I. (2018). Development of Mathematical Skill Assessment Instruments in Secondary School Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012147

Nursalam, Angriani, A. D., Darmawati, Baharuddin, & Aminuddin. (2018). Developing Test Instruments for Measurement of Students’ High-Order Thinking Skill on Mathematics in Junior High School in Makassar. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012169

Oktaviana, D., & Susiaty, U. D. (2020). Development of Test Instruments Based on Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy to Measure the Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v9i1.5638

Prabowo, A., Puspa, P., & Setyawan, F. (2021). Development of test instruments to measure high level thinking ability of two linear variable equations system. International Journal on Education Insight, 1(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijei.v1i2.3540

Rahayu, A., Syah, A., & Najib, A. (2021). Higher order thinking skills students in mathematical statistics course base on revised bloom taxonomy in factual and conceptual knowledge dimension. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042076

Rahayu, Ayu. (2018). The Analysis of Students’ Cognitive Ability Based on Assesments of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy on Statistic Materials. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 7(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v7i2.p80-85

Ramdiah, S., Abidinsyah, Royani, M., & Husamah. (2019). Understanding, planning, and implementation of HOTS by senior high school biology teachers in Banjarmasin-Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12128a

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.914a

Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih, E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a

Sadijah, C., Murtafiah, W., Anwar, L., Nurhakiki, R., & Cahyowati, E. T. D. (2021). Teaching higher-order thinking skills in mathematics classrooms: Gender differences. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.13087.159-180

Sagala, P. N., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025

Samo, D. D. (2017). Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Conception of Higher-Order Thinking Level in Bloom’S Taxonomy. Infinity Journal, 6(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p121-136

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology (5th edition). McGraw Hill.

Situmorang, K., Putri, R. I. I., & Lelyana, C. K. (2020). Analisis HOTS Siswa pada Materi Pola Bilangan menggunakan Pendekatan PMRI melalui Sistem LSLC. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2213

Susanto, E., & Retnawati, H. (2016). Perangkat pembelajaran matematika bercirikan PBL untuk mengembangkan HOTS siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v3i2.10631

Sutrisno, D., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Korelasi Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa MAN 3 Yogyakarta. EDUMATICA | Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(01), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v8i01.4655

Tanudjaya, C. P., & Doorman, M. (2020). Examining higher order thinking in Indonesian lower secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11000.277-300

Tanujaya, B., & Mumu, J. (2020). Students’ misconception of HOTS problems in teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012081

Tessmer, M. (1998). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. Kogan Page.

Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96–109. http://www.iejme.com/022008/d2.pdf

Wulandari, S., Hajidin, H., & Duskri, M. (2020). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Materi Aljabar di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i2.17774

Yunita, Y., Wahidin, W., & Tsurayya, A. (2018). The development of mathematics higher order thinking skills instrument for grade VIII junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012093

Zaki, M., Amalia, R., & Sofyan, S. (2020). Development of high order thinking skills (HOTS) test instrument on exponent for junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032096

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i2.7292