A Comparative Analysis of the Philippine and Indonesian English Curricula at the Elementary Education Level

Firly Asyifa, Rojab Siti Rodliyah, Lulu Laela Amaliya, Ahmad Dindang Mababaya

Abstract


Curriculum plays an important role in education because it provides a structured framework for learning. Understanding how English curricula in different countries are constructed can be beneficial for improving educational quality.  This study, therefore, aimed to analyze and compare the Indonesian and Philippine English curricula, focusing on their construction, particularly at the elementary education level. The study employed document analysis through three stages. First, the data were coded using themes adapted from Tyler’s Rationale (objectives, design, scope and sequence, evaluation). Then, a comparative analysis was conducted to identify similarities and differences between the two curricula. Finally, the findings were interpreted by considering contextual and philosophical factors influencing each curriculum. Findings reveal significant differences: the Philippine curriculum introduces English from Kindergarten, highlighting its role as a second language that is vital for national development and global integration. It employs a structured approach emphasizing early exposure, higher-order thinking, and standardized assessments. By contrast, Indonesia introduces English in Grade 3, prioritizing foundational skills in the Indonesian language first; and emphasizing flexibility, formative assessments, and greater teacher autonomy, allowing contextualized adaptation to diverse student needs. Despite these differences, both curricula aim to foster communicative competence, critical thinking, and intercultural awareness, essential skills for 21st-century learners. The results bring to light the importance of context-sensitive curriculum development that balances international educational trends with local linguistic realities, contributing theoretically by clarifying how national contexts influence curriculum choices in ESL and EFL environments. Practically, it provides actionable insights for policymakers and curriculum designers aiming to develop adaptable, inclusive, and culturally relevant English programs in multilingual contexts.

Keywords


Indonesian Emancipated Curriculum; Philippine Matatag Curriculum; Philosophical Foundations of Language Education; Tyler’s Rationale.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Alrajafi, G. (2021). The use of English in Indonesia: status and influence. SIGEH ELT: Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v1i1.355

Amanda, T. R., Mirza, A. A., & Qamariah, Z. (2023). A history of Merdeka Curriculum for English education in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nasional (JIPNAS), 1(2), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.59435/jipnas.v1i2.19

Antonelli, G. A. (1972). Ralph W. Tyler: The man and his work. Peabody Journal of Education, 50(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01619567209537889

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. In Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. Longmans.

Bruner, J. (1985). Child's talk: Learning to use language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 1(1), 111-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565908500100113

Burns, J. P. (2024). The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading. Prospects, 54(1), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y

Cahya, A. I., Elizar, E., Badawi, B., Masitoh, M., Rachmatia, M., & Apriza, B. (2024). Primary education in Southeast Asia: A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Philippines school curriculum. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(2), 2197-2210. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.4817

Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791222

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053

Damayanti, I. L. (2021). Cerita (Stories): A Pedagogical Model for Teaching Story Genres to Lower Secondary School Students in Indonesia. https://ro.uow.edu.au/articles/thesis/Cerita_Stories_A_Pedagogical_Model_for_Teaching_Story_Genres_to_Lower_Secondary_School_Students_in_Indonesia/27667623

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202

Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and Education (60th ed.). Kappa Delta Pi.

Emilia, E. (2021). Ralph W. Tyler and his contribution to the development of curriculum of Englis. Concepts and Principles, 56-67. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1c7uUFaHmSELL4OctEtAunIp7LplJ5WRi/view?usp=sharing

Fotheringham, M. J., Strickland, M. K., & Aitchison, K. (2012). Curriculum: Directions, decisions, and debate. The Quality Assurance Agency for High Education. http://researchrepository.napier.ac.uk/id/eprint/6020

Grumet, M. R. (1975). Existential and phenomenological foundations of currere: Self-report in curriculum inquiry. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED104745

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/2978900

Ibeh, A. I. (2022). Curriculum theory by Ralph Tyler and its implication for 21st century learning. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 4(2), 52-61. https://www.unijerps.org/index.php/unijerps/article/view/329

Kachru, B. (1992). World Englishes: Approaches, issues and resources. Language Teaching, 25, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800006583

Kilag, O. K. T., Andrin, G. R., Abellanosa, C., Marlon T. Villaver, Jr., Uy, F. T., & Sasan, J. M. V. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum rollout: Understanding challenges for effective implementation. risejournals.org. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11183037

Matthews, P. (2001). A short history of structural linguistics. In A Short History of Structural Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511612596

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL1429868M/Qualitative_data_analysis

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Nasir, A., Yawan, H., & Saifullah, S. (2023). A comparative study: Similarities and differences between Indonesia’s curriculum and Philippine’s curriculum. International Journal of Education, Social Studies, and Management (IJESSM), 2(3), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v2i3.121

Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (2008). Understanding Curriculum. Peter Lang Verlag. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1101954

Po, E. C. (2025). Challenges Faced by School Heads and Teachers in the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum and Performance of Students. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(3), 88-98. ENARCISA-C.-PO.pdf

Prideaux, D. (2003). Curriculum design. BMJ, 326(7383). 268–270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7383.268

Puntambekar, S. (2022). Distributed scaffolding: Scaffolding students in classroom environments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09636-3

Rahmawati, R., Ridwan, R., & Calambro, J. (2021). A comparative-case study of junior high school English curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2020), 16–17 October 2020, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305231

Rapp, A. C., & Corral-Granados, A. (2024). Understanding inclusive education–a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725

Ren, X., Lv, Y., Wang, K., & Han, J. (2017). Comparative document analysis for large text corpora. WSDM 2017 - Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3018661.3018690

Richard, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Content-based instruction. In Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (pp. 204–222). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305.021

Rohmah, Z., Hamamah, H., Junining, E., Ilma, A., & Rochastuti, L. A. (2024). Schools’ support in the implementation of the Emancipated Curriculum in secondary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2300182

Rose, D. & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox. https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog/6038674

Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.

Santos, A. N. N. I. E., Fernandez, V. A. N. E. S. S. A., & Ilustre, R. A. M. I. L. (2022). English language proficiency in the Philippines: An overview. International Journal of English Language Studies, 4(3), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2022.4.3.7

Saracho, O. N. (2023). Theories of child development and their impact on early childhood education and care. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01271-5

Stone K. M. (1985). Ralph W. Tyler’s principles of curriculum, instruction and evaluation: past influences and present effects evaluation. [Dissertation, Loyola University Chicago]. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2382

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development; Theory and Practice - Hilda Taba - Google Books. Brace & World. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000225529

Tavares, M. C., Azevedo, G., Marques, R. P., & Bastos, M. A. (2023). Challenges of education in the accounting profession in the era 5.0: A systematic review. Cogent Business and Management, 8(5). 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2220198

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In: D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (eds.), Curriculum studies reader (4th ed.), pp. 59–68. RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226820323.001.0001

Vygotsky L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wraga, W. G. (2017). Understanding the Tyler rationale: basic principles of curriculum and instruction in historical context. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 4(2). 227-252. https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.156




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v8i2.30813

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Firly Asyifa, Rojab Siti Rodliyah, Lulu Laela Amaliya, Ahmad Dindang Mababaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) already indexed:

            

___________________________________________________________________

  
   https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.

   Creative Commons License
   IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application)
   is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 View IJECA Stats

____________________________________________________________________

 IJECA Publisher Office: