EFL Students’ Motivational Regulation and Behavioral Engagement in Academic Reading Tasks: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry

Nila Kencana, Sinarman Jaya

Abstract


Motivational regulation and behavioral engagement influence academic reading in EFL higher education, yet many students struggle to stay motivated and actively involved in demanding tasks. Prior research has often treated these constructs separately and relied on self-report data, so we still know little about how students regulate their motivation in practice or how this connects to their observable engagement. This study aims to examine how motivational regulation relates to behavioral engagement in EFL academic reading. It also aims to identify the strategies students use to regulate motivation and sustain engagement during cognitively demanding reading tasks through a mixed-methods approach. The participants were 114 third-semester EFL students from four universities in Bengkulu, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling based on their enrollment in academic reading courses. Quantitative data were collected through a motivational regulation and engagement questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and correlation analysis to identify patterns and relationships between constructs. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically to explain the quantitative results. The findings indicate that students demonstrated relatively high behavioral engagement in academic reading (M = 3.17). Students also reported strong goal-directed motivation (M = 3.33) and self-regulation (M = 3.10–3.25). Qualitative evidence suggests that students who actively regulate their motivation are more likely to continue reading difficult texts and complete their tasks. Interview results further revealed that goal setting, effort regulation, and perceived task value supported sustained engagement in reading activities. These findings highlight motivational regulation as a key mechanism supporting behavioral engagement in EFL academic reading. The study contributes empirical evidence showing how goal setting, time management, and comprehension monitoring support sustained engagement during demanding reading tasks. Pedagogically, the findings suggest that academic reading instruction should explicitly integrate motivational regulation strategies through structured pre-reading goals, guided monitoring activities, and reflective tasks to help students sustain effort and engagement in higher education EFL contexts.

Keywords


Academic Reading Tasks; Behavioral Engagement; EFL Higher Education; Motivational Regulation; Self-Regulated Learning.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Abdalla, R. (2023). Investigating EFL University Students’ Motivation in Learning. Al-Adab Journal, 146, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i146.4287

Abdollahzadeh, E., Amini Farsani, M., & Zandi, M. (2022). The relationship between L2 motivation and transformative engagement in academic reading among EAP learners: Implications for reading self-regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944650

Afdal, H. W., Spernes, K., & Hoff-Jenssen, R. (2023). Academic reading as a social practice in higher education. Higher Education, 85(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00893-x

Alfahid, M., & Zai, S. (2024). Using self-regulated learning strategies in blended classrooms to improve students’ receptive language proficiency. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 182–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p182

Antia, B., & Vogt, K. (2022). Diagnostic assessment of academic reading: Peeping into students’ annotated texts. Languages, 7(84), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020084

Anwar, I. W., & Sailuddin, S. P. (2022). This research aimed to provide a detailed description and identify the students’ need to develop an English as Foreign Language (EFL) academic reading learning model using the problem-based learning (PBL) approach and blended learning (BL). The study empl. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4849

Archila, P., Ortiz, B., & De Mejía, A. (2025). Beyond the passive absorption of information: Engaging students in the critical reading of scientific articles. Science & Education, 34(4), 2189–2223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00507-1

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage, London.

Cobo-Rendón, R., López-Angulo, Y., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Mella-Norambuena, J. (2022). Engagement, academic motivation, and adjustment of university students. Revista Electronica Educare, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-3.15

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications.

Dierendonck, C., Tóth-Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Kerger, S., Milmeister, P., & Poncelet, D. (2023). Testing associations between global and specific levels of student academic motivation and engagement in the classroom. Journal of Experimental Education, 91(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1913979

Dörnyei, Z., Henry, A., & Muir, C. (2015). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused interventions. In Motivational Currents in Language Learning: Frameworks for Focused Interventions. Taylor and Francis Inc. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772714

Fredricks, J., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M., A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Fredricks, J. A., Parr, A. K., Amemiya, J. L., Wang, M. Te, & Brauer, S. (2019). What Matters for Urban Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638

Froment, F., de-Besa Gutiérrez, M., & Flores, J. G. (2023). Effect of autonomy support on academic satisfaction: academic motivation and engagement as mediating variables. Revista de Investigacion Educativa, 41(2), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.546251

Ghavamnia, M., & Kashkouli, Z. (2022). Motivation, engagement, strategy use, and L2 reading proficiency in Iranian EFL learners: An investigation of relations and predictability. Reading Psychology, 43(7), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2113943

Grabe, W. (2021). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Han, F. (2021). The relations between motivation, strategy use, frequency, and proficiency in foreign language reading: An investigation with university English language learners in China. SAGE Open, 11(2), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211008423

Han, J. (2023). Motivation, engagement, and reading comprehension in EFL learners. Reading in a Foreign Language.

Honicke, T., Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2023). The self-efficacy and academic performance reciprocal relationship: the influence of task difficulty and baseline achievement on learner trajectory. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2197194

Hussin, A. A., Syed Ahmad, T. S. A., Awang, S., Aziz, R. A., Ahmad, S. N., & Binti Azlan, N. A. (2024). Student Insights: Challenges in Acquiring Critical Academic Reading Skills. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(IX), 938–950. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.809081

Indriyani, G., & Pertiwi, I. S. (2021). Exploring the EFL Students’ Reading Strategies Used on Reading Academic Articles. PANYONARA: Journal of English Education, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v3i2.5008

Ivankova, N. V, Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2020). Using mixed-methods explanatory design in educational research. Field Methods.

Khonamri, F., Azizi, N., Akimjak, A., & Kurilenko, V. (2024). The prospects of reading circles for fostering EFL learners’ motivation to read and engagement. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 403–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.403.418

Lap, T., Nguyen, D., & Tuan, L. (2025). The employment of self-regulated reading strategies by English as a foreign language students in Vietnam. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 25(2), 294–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69598/hasss.25.2.272352.

Laursen, B., Richmond, A., Kiuru, N., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2022). Off on the wrong foot: Task avoidance at the outset of primary school anticipates academic difficulties and declining peer acceptance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2021.1936491

Le, T. T. M. (2023). Students’ Motivation in an EFL Reading Class. ICTE Conference Proceedings, 3, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.54855/ictep.23310

Luo, R., & Zhou, Y. (2024). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies in higher education blended learning: A five years systematic review. J. Comput. Assist. Learn, 40, 3005–3029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13052

Mahdahera, D. D. U., & Ridwan, I. (2023). EFL students’ engagement in reading comprehension using cooperative integrated reading and composition. Bahtera: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.21009/bahtera.221.01

Mason, W., & Warmington, M. (2024). Academic reading as a grudging act: how do Higher Education students experience academic reading and what can educators do about it? Higher Education, 88(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01145-2

Mežek, Š., McGrath, L., Negretti, R., & Berggren, J. (2022). Scaffolding L2 Academic Reading and Self-Regulation Through Task and Feedback. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3018

Nadeak, A. L., & Kuswandono, P. (2024). Motivation-regulation Strategies for English Academic Reading among Undergraduate Students at a Private University. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 12(2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i2.83421

Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Hirosawa, E. (2022). Self-determination theory and engagement in language learning: : A dialogic process. In A. H. Al-Hoorie & Szabó (Eds.) (Ed.), Researching Language Learning Motivation: A Concise Guide (pp. 71–80). Bloomsbury.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation (1st Editio). Routledge.

Qi, J., Reynolds, B., & Bai, X. (2025). Examining the relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among primary school students in mainland China: An extension of Tse, Lin, & Ng (2022). Reading in a Foreign Language, 37(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/67480

Qi, X. (2021). Effects of self-regulated learning on student’s reading literacy: Evidence from Shanghai. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.555849

Quadir, M. (2021). Teaching factors that affect students’ learning motivation: Bangladeshi efl students’ perceptions. Teflin Journal, 32(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v32i2/295-315

Reyes, M., Morales, M., & Bajo, M. (2024). Self-regulated learning strategies in L1 and L2 reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 28, 879–896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000683

Rohmani, L. A. (2022). Teachers’ Difficulties in Enhancing EFL Students’ Reading Motivation. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL), 5(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.20527/jetall.v5i1.12569

Singh, M., James, P., Paul, H., & Bolar, K. (2022). Impact of cognitive-behavioral motivation on student engagement. Heliyon, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09843

Talwar, A., Magliano, J. P., Higgs, K., Santuzzi, A., Tonks, S., O’Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2023). Early academic success in college: Examining the contributions of reading literacy skills, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading motivation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 53(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2137069

Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.224

Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2023). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 1456–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236

Zaha, A. (2022). Analysis of the interrelatedness of Self -Regulation, Learners‟ Engagement, and Self-Perceived development in a synchronous online EFL reading course. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p39

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From Cognitive Modeling to Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Career Path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v9i1.38335

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Nila Kencana, Sinarman Jaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) already indexed:

            

___________________________________________________________________

  
   https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.

   Creative Commons License
   IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application)
   is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 View IJECA Stats

____________________________________________________________________

 IJECA Publisher Office: