Perceptions Toward the Effectiveness of MOOCs: A Case Study of Afghan Postgraduate Students at UiTM, Malaysia

Hazrat Usman Mashwani, Izaham Shah Ismail

Abstract


The use of technology in education is inevitable in the current era of quality education. The technology works as a backbone of the modern education system and without technology, the modern education would have never achieved the current success. Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) is one of the best examples of modern instructional technology in education. MOOC has made the current education so vivid and accessible that anyone, anytime from anywhere can follow the classes as the traditional student does. As technology is a big issue in Afghanistan, so it has hindered the use of MOOCs in the educational system of Afghanistan. However, a great number of Afghan students regularly go abroad for their higher studies where they come across with the use of MOOCs. This study aims to investigate the perceptions of Afghan postgraduate students at Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) toward the effectiveness of MOOCs. The study has specifically investigated the perceptions of Afghan postgraduate students at UiTM toward MOOCs and the challenges students face while using MOOCs for learning. A qualitative research approach was used for the study. The data collected through semi-structured interviews was thematically analysed and presented. Overall, 5 participants participated in the study. The findings revealed that participants had positive views towards the use of MOOCs and considered MOOCs as the best source of learning. Unreliable uploaded materials, technical issues of the MOOC's software and students' lack of proper knowledge to use MOOCs were some of the leading challenges while using MOOCs.

Keywords


Afghan Students; Challenges; Effectiveness; MOOCs; Perceptions; TESL; UiTM; Malaysia.

Full Text:

DOWNLOAD [PDF]

References


Alfehaid, A. F. T. (2011). Developing an Esp Curriculum for Students of Health. phD Thesis, January, 321.

Alice Omariba, E. G. and H. A. (2016). Challenges Facing Teachers and Students in the Use of Instructional Technologies : A Case of Selected Secondary Schools in Kisii Central District, Kisii County. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 03(11), 3129–3137.

Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 380–389.

Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835768

Balch, T. (2013). About MOOC completion rates: The importance of student investment. The Augmented Trader Blog: Http://augmentedtrader. …. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:About+MOOC+Completion+Rates:+The+Importance+of+Student+Investment.#0nhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:About+MOOC+completion+rates:+The+importance+of+student+investm

Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2017). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2299

Bates, A. W. T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Second Edition (2019) | teachonline.ca. Tony Bates Associates LTD. https://teachonline.ca/teaching-in-a-digital-age/teaching-in-a-digital-age-second-edition

Chengjie, Y. (2015). Challenges and Changes of MOOC to Traditional Classroom Teaching Mode. Canadian Social Science, 11(111), 135–139.

Chua, S. H., Kim, J., Monserrat, T. J. K., & Zhao, S. (2015). Understanding learners’ general perception towards learning with MOOC classmates: An exploratory study. L@S 2015 - 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2728680

Conole, G. (2016). MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 50. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/2

Dillahunt, T., Wang, Z., & Teasley, S. D. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841

Ghazali, N. B., & Nordin, M. S. (2018). The perception of university lecturers of teaching and learning in massive open online courses (MOOCs). Journal of Personalized Learning. http://spaj.ukm.my/jplearning/index.php/jplearning/article/view/107http://spaj.ukm.my/jplearning/index.php/jplearning/article/viewFile/107/67

Grajek, S. (2014). Higher Education's Top-Ten Strategic Technologies for 2014. EDUCAUSE.

Goh, L. H. (2016). The effectiveness and challenges of MOOC for learning. Third Asia Pacific Conference on Advanced Research (APCAR, Melbourne), 1, 275–287. https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/16_APCAR_July_BRR771_EDU-275-287.pdf

Hallam, B., Miles, H. C., & Dale, E. (1955). Audio Visual Methods in Teaching. Art Education, 8(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.2307/3184288

Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S. O., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2381263

Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and Reality. Full Report. Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY., May, 211.

Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651

Koedinger, K. R., McLaughlin, E. A., Kim, J., Jia, J. Z., & Bier, N. L. (2015). Learning is not a spectator sport: Doing is better than watching for learning from a MOOC. L@S 2015 - 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724681

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455

Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, 266–275.

Manalo, J. M. A. (2014). An evaluation of participants’ levels of satisfaction and perceived learning regarding the MOOC in @RAL platform. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 101–121.

Moe, R. (2015). The brief & expansive history (and future) of the MOOC: Why two divergent models share the same name. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning (CIEE), 2(1|2), 1–14.

Mohamed, M. H., & Hammond, M. (2018). MOOCs: a differentiation by pedagogy, content and assessment. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0062

Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23

Rajabi, H., & Virkus, S. (2013). The Potential and Readiness of Tallinn University to Establish Massive Open Online Courses ( MOOCs ). Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 4, 431–439.

Rajendram, R. (2014, October 5). Government Boost for Online Learning.

Sachiko, M. (2016). College Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: Knowledge Gain and Course Effectiveness. The Online Journal of Distance Education and Learning, 4(2), 20–30.

Siemens, G. (2012). MOOCs are really a platform. Elearningspace.org. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/nSiemens

Starman, A. B. (2013). Starman, A. B. (2013). The Case Study as a Type of Qualitative Research. Journal of Contemporary Education Studies, 1(September 2014), 28–43.

Whitehead, D., & Lopez, V. (2016). Sampling data and data collection in qualitative research methods. Nursing and Midwifery Research, June 2016, 111–126. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255950308

Yuan, Li and Powel, S. (2018). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. In Centre for Educational Technology & Interoperability Standards.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v7i1.22922

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Hazrat Usman Mashwani, Izaham Shah Ismail

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) already indexed:

            

___________________________________________________________________

  
   https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.

   Creative Commons License
   IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application)
   is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 View IJECA Stats

____________________________________________________________________

 IJECA Publisher Office: